Why is there a lack of quality criticism of JTF? Why are 99% of our opponents name-callers and non-thinkers? There are subjects that I disagree on with JTF that I would be able to formulate into reasoned arguments.
I like to learn all sides of every argument. I am a fairly open-minded person. Whenever I read something interesting, whether I agree with the text or disagree with it, I take time to read the opposing view.
Why is there a dearth of nuanced criticism of JTF?