General Category > General Discussion

Who in Britain are the enemies of the Kahanist movement?

(1/5) > >>

sat_chit_anand:
It might be easier to ask the question: who aren't?

Who, or what organisation in Britain is, essentially, the absolute worst enemy of the Kahanist movement?

fake plastic trees:
The worst enemy?

Probably the govermnent...

wonderfulgoy:

--- Quote from: sat_chit_anand on November 22, 2006, 06:22:54 AM ---Who, or what organisation in Britain is, essentially, the absolute worst enemy of the Kahanist movement?

--- End quote ---



British Jewry.   ;D

sat_chit_anand:

--- Quote from: Get thee hence Satan on November 23, 2006, 07:05:10 AM ---
--- Quote from: sat_chit_anand on November 22, 2006, 06:22:54 AM ---Who, or what organisation in Britain is, essentially, the absolute worst enemy of the Kahanist movement?

--- End quote ---



British Jewry.   ;D

--- End quote ---

If you were really joking, that would be funny.

Who are the good people and who are the bad people?

Presumably Rabbi Jonathan Sacks is a voice of 'moderation', and a mouthpiece of the Jewish liberal establishment, although he is not a liberal as such.

I am a nationalist so I know who the commies are and yes, many of them are Jewish.

Searchlight Magazine - the 'anti-fascist' magazine is an interesting phenomenon, because they are regarded by much of the left (the Palestine sympathisers) as a 'Zionist front-group' and as part of the state apparatus. I believe this to be true. They are certainly a powerful group.

But really, who are the main bad guys in Britain? I would say the British establishment and the Jewish establishment (particularly where they interface with the British establishment) and the leftists and the Jewish 'voices of moderation' which the establishment wheel out when required.

I would say... more or less everyone actually, so you are probably almost right. The three main parties in Britain all have a 'Friends of Israel' group attached to them. I went to a presentation/debate given by 'Conservative Friends of Israel' once. They were good advocates for Israel-the-State and excellent debaters, but they were really just towing the establishment line.

I pressed them with regard to the withdrawals, and their attitude was shocking and quite mercenary. They are prepared to risk lives, just to appear 'moderate'.

Melanie Phillips has been a good advocate for Israel, but she has also been unpleasant about the BNP (who I support) and she has not issued a strong enough challenge to the Jewish leftists, although she has been pretty strong on the apologisers for jihad (eg. George Galloway (G'Allah'Way ;D )etc.) that does not go far enough, IMO.

wonderfulgoy:
I caught a link someone posted to a speech Nick Griffin made just last year, where he was effusively praising David Duke and was talking about how, despite sympathizing with revisionism, he thinks it ought to be kept separate from politics because most people aren't interested in it.

In other words, Nick Griffin hasn't ditched his ideas about Jews at all.  He just doesn't let his party members say anything anti-Semitic.  Just in the same way that the BNP never says anything about negroes in public any more, the self-same negroes who are causing havoc (not to mention many illegitimate births) up and down the length of the country.

So in reality we don't have any pro-white non-Nazi movement at all in Britain.  Maybe that's part of the problem?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page