Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea

Scientists inscribe entire Bible on head of a pin

<< < (2/3) > >>

Raulmarrio2000:

--- Quote from: Nolandforshalom on December 24, 2007, 10:26:30 PM ---
--- Quote from: newman on December 24, 2007, 10:25:25 PM ---They should tatoo the Bible on the foreheads of muSSlim terrorists.

--- End quote ---
I never thought of that! Thats a great idea!

--- End quote ---

NOOOOOO! Chalilah, Pig's skin is not Kosher. How can you write the Bible on a pigs' forehead????

Daniel:

--- Quote from: newman on December 24, 2007, 10:25:25 PM ---They should tatoo the Bible on the foreheads of muSSlim terrorists.

--- End quote ---

More like the foreSKINs of MuSSlim terrorists.

newman:

--- Quote from: Daniel on December 25, 2007, 12:51:38 AM ---
--- Quote from: newman on December 24, 2007, 10:25:25 PM ---They should tatoo the Bible on the foreheads of muSSlim terrorists.

--- End quote ---

More like the foreSKINs of MuSSlim terrorists.

--- End quote ---

They don't have them. Another idea they ripped off from Torah! >:(

Daniel:

--- Quote from: newman on December 25, 2007, 12:53:55 AM ---
--- Quote from: Daniel on December 25, 2007, 12:51:38 AM ---
--- Quote from: newman on December 24, 2007, 10:25:25 PM ---They should tatoo the Bible on the foreheads of muSSlim terrorists.

--- End quote ---

More like the foreSKINs of MuSSlim terrorists.

--- End quote ---

They don't have them. Another idea they ripped off from Torah! >:(

--- End quote ---

That makes the Muslims the Joe Bidens of our times  ;D  (in reference to Biden's plagiarized remarks of some of his past speeches)

q_q_:

--- Quote from: New Yorker on December 24, 2007, 07:26:03 PM ---

While we are on the subject of scientists and the bible, what are the board member's opinion of the Bible Code? Real? or are you Skeptical? The jury is out on that for me.

--- End quote ---

Aish had a good analysis of it.

According to the original researchers(RIPS, Witzum,..), they say Drosnin`s stuff is nonsense.. i.e. where you look for anything. So that rules out predicting the future.  You can do that with any book.

But the original scientific paper, which got published in a peer reviewed statistics journal, is prob legit. They had a bunch of names of rabbis, and i think dates of birth, and they found occurrences more than was statistically expected. 

The argument against it is that they cooked the data i.e. they had a list of names, one did not occur, so they amended the spelling, i.e. they fudged the data.  The pro codes group e.g. Witzum, have suggested an independent neutral party agreed by the anti code group.  But the anti code group have not responded. There is alot online about this. e.g. on Witzum`s website. And Harold Gans had a primer on it.

The anti code group are using very deceptive tactics, by largely attacking Drosnin`s book (Which was more of a popular non scientific thing)..  And pretending that this refutes the whole thing. And the pro code group have actually Proven, that the anti code group fudged their data.   

The scientific world has reacted very unscientifically towards the pro code researchers. As Harold Gans mentions.  They actually had a vote/signed petition, against any bible code research!!! And not because of any issue they had with how the research was done

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version