Kahanist Singles > Jewish Singles
Public Displays of Affection!
Kiwi:
--- Quote from: Scriabin on January 23, 2008, 12:34:33 AM ---
--- Quote from: Skippy on January 23, 2008, 12:30:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: ~*Mills*~ on January 23, 2008, 12:21:59 AM ---
--- Quote from: Skippy on January 22, 2008, 09:37:51 PM ---
--- Quote from: ~*Mills*~ on January 22, 2008, 09:11:50 PM ---Skippy, no offense but you TOTALLY took this the wrong way and I was NOT even mentioning "hell" WTH?
I was just saying to NOT touch for privacy reasons. There is a BIG difference from me saying that it could be kept private compared to YOUR version of sinning and hell.
I don't even think its a "sin" so I have no clue where you got this from.
Why would you think this anyways? ???
--- End quote ---
Because quite honestly I am a very moral Jewish woman, you are making it sound so loose to even be touched by a man.
My rabbi has even touched me in public. Does that make it bad as well? No its called being a human.
I touch people everyday in public, I have people coming and hugging me. Some oh yes get the stones out! They even kiss me. Does that make me a scarlet woman?
On well then it must, because every day I hug and kiss a fella who is not my husband, he is my baby nephew and trust me I don't care whos looking.
--- End quote ---
I still feel that you are taking it too far and you don't see the point.
I never wrote that it was horribly wrong! I don't understand WHY you insist on turning this into "scarlet woman" and "sins" and "hell"
Was I talking about that?? NO!
I just said it was good to not touch for privacy reasons regarding the laws of Niddah BUT that some people might not care for the privacy of it. I didn't say people should never touch under penalty of whatever, I said SOME people prefer not to, other prefer to touch.
THIS is soooooooooooooo much more different to what you are now saying.
I DON'T understand WHY you are turning into an argument over how you touch people. I don't care what you do or who touches you, it doesn't concern me OR anything I wrote about.
I still can't believe you've taken this the wrong way, its kind of painful for me to read all this and how some opinions about choosing to not touch are being turned into "hell" and "A Scarlet woman"
Who do you think I am? Someone who condemns people for touching in public? :'( WOW I CAN'T believe this.
--- End quote ---
I am sorry Mills but thats exactly what it sounded like to me. And I am not turning this into an argument can't I state my thoughts here any more.
Just Great!
--- End quote ---
Skippy, take a deep breath.
--- End quote ---
Take a jump
Joe Schmo:
--- Quote from: ~*Mills*~ on January 23, 2008, 12:39:56 AM ---
--- Quote from: Skippy on January 23, 2008, 12:30:51 AM ---
I am sorry Mills but thats exactly what it sounded like to me. And I am not turning this into an argument can't I state my thoughts here any more.
Just Great!
--- End quote ---
Come on! Out of EVERYONE in the forum, just YOU took it this way?
And where did you get the "hell" from anyways? I personally feel attacked. I feel that my words were being changed. But that is all I will say on the matter.
BUT I am sure many others will agree that my post was NOT condemning ANYONE who "touches" I said it was a choice to either protect the privacy or not. YOU are the one who went off topic and started to say "hell" and "scarlet woman" which when one looks at the post is completely out of place.
And you disregard the fact that I DO NOT care if men and women touch! Since its a choice and I don't want people to be forced to do things they don't want. You can touch men in public for all I care.
I am shocked. That's all I will say on the topic. But I wont forget.
But when you go around taking things out of context in a manner that makes people feel that their words were changed and keep at it, its kind of like....arguing.
But I made my point, everyone knows how I feel and wont argue the matter.
My fellow JTFers, YOU be the judges....was my post condemning those who touch to "hell"? I don't think so.
I will drop it.
--- End quote ---
Mills, I COMPLETELY understand what you're saying.
KansasJew:
Okay boys and girls lets try and behave as adults for our Guest and Enemies. TY in advance.
Kiwi:
--- Quote from: Scriabin on January 23, 2008, 12:44:33 AM ---
--- Quote from: Skippy on January 23, 2008, 12:43:11 AM ---
--- Quote from: Scriabin on January 23, 2008, 12:34:33 AM ---
--- Quote from: Skippy on January 23, 2008, 12:30:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: ~*Mills*~ on January 23, 2008, 12:21:59 AM ---
--- Quote from: Skippy on January 22, 2008, 09:37:51 PM ---
--- Quote from: ~*Mills*~ on January 22, 2008, 09:11:50 PM ---Skippy, no offense but you TOTALLY took this the wrong way and I was NOT even mentioning "hell" WTH?
I was just saying to NOT touch for privacy reasons. There is a BIG difference from me saying that it could be kept private compared to YOUR version of sinning and hell.
I don't even think its a "sin" so I have no clue where you got this from.
Why would you think this anyways? ???
--- End quote ---
Because quite honestly I am a very moral Jewish woman, you are making it sound so loose to even be touched by a man.
My rabbi has even touched me in public. Does that make it bad as well? No its called being a human.
I touch people everyday in public, I have people coming and hugging me. Some oh yes get the stones out! They even kiss me. Does that make me a scarlet woman?
On well then it must, because every day I hug and kiss a fella who is not my husband, he is my baby nephew and trust me I don't care whos looking.
--- End quote ---
I still feel that you are taking it too far and you don't see the point.
I never wrote that it was horribly wrong! I don't understand WHY you insist on turning this into "scarlet woman" and "sins" and "hell"
Was I talking about that?? NO!
I just said it was good to not touch for privacy reasons regarding the laws of Niddah BUT that some people might not care for the privacy of it. I didn't say people should never touch under penalty of whatever, I said SOME people prefer not to, other prefer to touch.
THIS is soooooooooooooo much more different to what you are now saying.
I DON'T understand WHY you are turning into an argument over how you touch people. I don't care what you do or who touches you, it doesn't concern me OR anything I wrote about.
I still can't believe you've taken this the wrong way, its kind of painful for me to read all this and how some opinions about choosing to not touch are being turned into "hell" and "A Scarlet woman"
Who do you think I am? Someone who condemns people for touching in public? :'( WOW I CAN'T believe this.
--- End quote ---
I am sorry Mills but thats exactly what it sounded like to me. And I am not turning this into an argument can't I state my thoughts here any more.
Just Great!
--- End quote ---
Skippy, take a deep breath.
--- End quote ---
Take a jump
--- End quote ---
Wow! You're So angry.
I'm SO happy.
--- End quote ---
Freak
Vito:
--- Quote from: KansasJew on January 23, 2008, 12:42:55 AM ---besides is not the concept of "hell" a christian concept anyways. We will be judged on our actions and inactions according to Torah. But "Hell" I do not think so im my best I love lucy cuban accent.
--- End quote ---
Christians are also judged based on their actions according to the Bible... but holding hands isn't really one of the requirements for hell lol. But back in the old days couples didn't hold hands, my 100 year old aunt told me that :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version