0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
One might ask; since most survivalists have left the cities and so are no danger to city folk, why the media blitz against urban dropouts? Also, if city folk are right in believing they live in the best of all possible worlds, why don't they just ignore us? Besides, it's unkind to make fun of us poor crazies afflicted with various forms of anxiety neuroses. It simply makes no sense for the media to be obsessed with urban dropouts unless the mere fact that we have withdrawn is a threat to the cities. But, you see, we are a threat to the cities. Brain drain. White flight. Eroding urban tax bases. Plain, gut-level jealousy towards those able to leave their respective Disneylands for dummies for cleaner, safer areas. I could go on and on. A big factor in painting us as vicious lunatics is to use us as an example of the kind of people who refuse to share the fate of those who stay behind. We are the rats leaving the sinking ship. We are the non-supportive. We can't stand the gaff. We lack compassion for the social dependents we abandon on the doorsteps of those with a stake in the cities. All this is simply because we refuse to be the victims of demanding parasites, muggers, burglars, etc. Every one who leaves makes city folk more heavily taxed and more likely to be criminally assaulted, due to the decrease in potential victims. So the fear is not with us; it is with them. The hostility is not from us; it is from them. So it stands to reason that if they can convince others that we are degenerate goofs, less city folk will be inclined to imitate us.