Back to ammo, some of the Republicans (and so called right wingers) seem to think that it's perfectly acceptable to ban ammunition and guns from China and potential enemies in the middle east. What is your take on this? During the Vietnam war, many soldiers brought back SKS and AK47's as war trophies. I am against banning of any surplus ammunition or rifles.
Oddly, some of the best AK47's were made in China. There was a question however on the safety of some of the ammo, for example, ammunition made in the UAE was crimped so tight that it was causing the ammunition to explode in the gun when fired. I wonder if this was deliberate sabotage.
Technically, all the ammo I order is from the East block, Serbian, Czech, Russian, US has been in talks to end trade with Russia, I wonder if this will affect our ability to purchase Saigas or ammunition made in Russia? Or what's going on with Serbia, I wonder if we will see an end of surplus ammunition coming into the US?
There are definitely pros and cons of surplus ammo, price is one of the big ones, I can buy much more ammunition that is surplussed from overseas than if I were to buy ammunition made in the US.
This has played a pretty big debate on some of the gun forums, some people claiming they refuse to buy ammunition overseas and supporting the ban.
However when it comes down to companies selling ammo to our enemies it does leave me wondering. I know that when Steyr Mannlicher of Austria sold .50 bmg rifles to Iran, there was a ton of controversy and many gun owners said they would boycott Austrian products and Steyr Mannlicher. I'm not so sure we can boycott everything though, if we consider arms, it's just that, a open market. US guns have ended up in enemy hands directly and indirectly, same with Israeli arms, German arms, Russian arms, heck in many cases the Russians were fighting against enemies that they had sold arms to!
I am personally against the regulation of ammo, then again, some of the ammo that is available really makes me wonder....
You know, this is a post I read on THR and it certainly will make you think.
Here's a quote from a book I just read:
… One area of interest in Malaya (1948) was the doubtful practice of using booby-trapped ammunition by the government forces. Although not a new tactic it was fraught with danger because control of the booby-trapped rounds is lost at the point that they are left for the enemy to find.
In Malaya there is evidence that this practice was actively pursued. In Operation Purvey, some 10,000 rounds of .303 were doctored with high explosive. On firing, either from a rifle or a Bren light machine-gun, such a cartridge would detonate, burst the barrel, and kill or severely injure the firer. There was some concern about the legality of such actions, but General Templer, the GOC, dismissed these.
A further 50,000 rounds were ordered which were filled with a thermite incendiary composition. These when fired would simply melt and seal the breaches of the enemy weapons. The advantage of these was that if the enemy discovered the doctored rounds and managed to get them back into the British supply system they would not kill the British troops. The SAS also doctored weapons such as the Lee Enfield rifles, which were left for the communist terrorists (CT) to find.
It wasn't only the SAS that were involved in such activities. Roy Follows joined the Malaya Police and spent much time fighting the CT. In one incident he recorded that he was summoned to the Officer Commanding Special Branch and given a bandolier of .303 ammunition. He looked at it and on being asked what it was stated that it was the normal ball ammunition. He was then told that in fact the rounds had been doctored and the propellant, a low explosive, had been replaced with high explosive. Follows was then told to leave this ammunition where it was probable that the CT were likely to find it. He recorded that, several weeks after he had left the ammunition, there was an ambush by the terrorists in which it was reported that, as they opened fire, there were a number of breach explosions, which resulted in the ambush being abandoned…
(Source: “Malice Aforethought – A History of Bobby Traps from World War One to Vietnam”, Ian Jones, p 225, 226)
I suspect the same practice has been used many times. With all the foreign surplus ammo on the market today, I can't help but wonder if such rounds could be out there somewhere, perhaps at some gun show...
I guess it gives more people a reason to reload?