http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010696.htmlHow Britain took anti-racial profiling to the max and unleashed a wave of murders
(See, below, a link to a remarkable blog article on the wave of gang rapes of white females by nonwhites in Britain, with all the incidents sourced in mainstream British newspapers.)
London so far this year has had 33 knife murders, most of them by black youths. We've mentioned the ridiculously named Children's Commissioner, Sir Al Aynsley-Green, who says that young people must not be stopped and checked by police, as this will cause them to become even angrier at society than they already are, and so make them even likelier to stab strangers to death on the street. In other words, society is guilty, society is the cause of crime, and therefore any exertion of the authority of society by police officers only increases the guilt and increases the crime.
But beyond Aynsley-Green's almost metaphysical case against society, there is also the more specific social sin of racial disproportionality in outcome that must be avoided. Thus Janet Daily, the American journalist who has lived for many years in England, writes:
Just as using the word "black" in this context is to lay oneself open to the smear of racism, any perceptible targeting of black youths for particular attention by the police lays officers open to career-ending disciplinary procedures. [Italics added.]
The "sus" laws, which allowed officers to stop and search people on suspicion of carrying weapons or drugs, were scrapped because they were said to be a form of racial harassment. [Italics added.]
That was the beginning of what became a systematic programme of denial, the ultimate consequence of which was that blameless black people were left unprotected in effectively unpoliced neighbourhoods, and that many black mothers were left to grieve for their sons.
So, London is experiencing a grave epidemic of murders. These murders are overwhelmingly committed by blacks. But the police are barred from taking any useful steps to prevent these murders, because that would mean disproportionally "targeting" blacks--questioning them, checking them for weapons, etc.
The more alien and dangerous the members of a designated non-white or non-Western group happen to be, the more racist society is, and the less right it has to protect itself from those alien and dangerous people. This is the morally inverted, nihilistic social order created by the modern liberal belief in equality.
Here is the link:
http://tottenhamlad.blogspot.com/2008/03/savage-path-from-knoxville-to-tottenham.html- end of initial entry -
James M. writes from England:
"London so far this year has had 33 knife murders, most of them by black youths."
As far as I'm aware, the only one not by blacks was by a Turk.
Gang rape is not quite so heavily dominated by blacks: other non-whites are active too.
To back up that statement, James sends an amazingly detailed article by the blogger TottenhamLad (Born and bred in Tottenham, North London), in which numerous incidents of gang rape of white girls and women by blacks and other nonwhites are referenced to mainstream news articles. I am amazed that the race of the rapists and the victims were given over and over like this in regular newspapers. James sends the below quote from the blog entry (though I think the figure of a gang rape every day of the year must be exaggerated):
There has been a group rape [gang rape] for every day of the last year [2004] ... Scotland Yard is treating the evidence with care because it has sensitive racial overtones. It suggests a disproportionately high involvement of young black or Asian males in group sex [gang rape] attacks and that a high proportion of the victims are white... suspects of African/Caribbean appearance were identified in 49 per cent of attacks. A further 13 per cent were committed by men of Indian/Pakistani appearance... Women and girls of white/European appearance accounted for 59 per cent of victims... there is evidence of group [gang] rape is rising in other inner city areas of Britain.
Rick Darby writes:
You write, of the British authorities' attitude:
"In other words, society is guilty, society is the cause of crime, and therefore any exertion of the authority of society by police officers only increases the guilt and increases the crime."
Exactly. So society--not individual criminals--must be punished. Capital punishment, so to speak, since the members of society are not protected against being murdered, if protection might be interpreted (as of course it would be) as "targeting" blacks.