based on my interpretation of a talk he gave.
best case scenario with netanyahu, is he just stalls it.
For example, with Oslo, he agreed to it, because he thinks Israel needs international and at least american support in its war against terrorism.
He gave away some land because that was a first demand he couldn't get out of.. Then he came up with the idea of "reciprocity". We don't give anything unless we get something in return. So that slowed it down alot.
though, with unilateralism, reciprocity is largely gone away, though the people still demand it - when there is terrorism they are less willing to give land away.
We have really been through how all israeli PMs are the same, it's old news.
Some do it slow, some do it fast. Sometimes only a tough talker can convince the people to give away land. So the powers that be have all bases covered.