I'm new too, but, sorry, for the sake of logic - which I'm sure all of us will admit is a good thing:
Forgive me for being new as I am sure this has already been covered in this forum, so admin please remove this thread if that's the case. http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
"Sina's Challenge
I receive many emails from angry Muslims, who sometimes beg me, and sometimes order me to remove this site. I consider both, pleading and bullying, signs of psychopathology. Argumentum ad baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam are both logical fallacies.
If you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of acting as a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically. Not only will I remove the site, I will publicly announce that Islam is a true religion. I will also pay
$50,000 U.S. dollars
to anyone who can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:
a narcissist a misogynist a rapist
a pedophile a lecher a torturer
a mass murderer a cult leader an assassin
a terrorist a mad man a looter
I have debated with many Muslims....."
Site with link to each category above and much more:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
One can't disprove any of this 'logically', in an inductive mode (see the rules in the post), no matter how many Muslims one debates with, since it's a posit without any continuation.
The poster mentions that it can't be defeated through "Argumentum ad baculum [or] argumentum ad misericordiam" (both fallacies indeed) but, in fact, it can't be defended or confirmed through any argumentation theory model (where both 'fallacies' come from).
If you're making an inductive argument where "Argumentum ad baculum and argumentum ad misericordiam" are out, then such a question doesn't really have a leg to stand on since it doesn't even make an "ARGUMENTUM;" all it does is assert things:
to anyone who can disprove any of the dozen of the accusations that I have made against Muhammad. I accuse Muhammad of being:
a narcissist a misogynist a rapist
a pedophile a lecher a torturer
a mass murderer a cult leader an assassin
a terrorist a mad man a looter
I have debated with many Muslims....."
One could structure an argument in the mould of this question but it would be circular, making assertions without proof - a logical fallacy.
So In terms of logic, without politics, your question is unfair, you are asking people to disprove, not a logical structure, but an assumption which cannot be disproved or proved in your terms and your offer of $50,000 is meaningless.