On the last show you we kind'ov put Rav Ovadia Yosef Shlita and the Satmer Rebbe as having the same opinion. From what I know and hear, is that Rav Ovadia Yosef Shlita is agains't giving up land now, and their was even a video I saw (Yesh Din VeYesh Davin) where they show Rav Ovadia Yosef Shlita saying that Kush Katif was a horrible thing and that Sharon is cruel to Am Yisrael, and that "he should fall and not get up" (or something like that) which was said like a month before Sharon fell into a coma. And I dont agree, or see how he holds that it is a sin to be in the army (theoretically, but maybe in some ways it is- like many including Kahanists say- like the mixing of girls, following bad order, etc.- its a debate of good and bad to join). Also most of the people who support and follow the Rav are in the army, except for a small click of the top Talmidim.
We all know the situation today- that for sure giving up land, creates more terror, and only makes our enemies stronger. Rav Ovadia Yosef said that IF giving up land will bring security and peace, then it is okay. I argued with a guy who learns Torah the whole day, some time ago. About these type of things. Hes not a leftist anyway, but I did mention the Mitzva of Milhemit Mitzva, he said yes their is it, BUT that the nation is not ready becuase most Jews dont keep Shabb-t and dont do other things, so even if we wanted no one would follow. He also said that things like the thing that Baruch Goldstein ZTL HYD was not good becuase now we have a widow and fatherless children (the Jews).
So to kinda sum up- would their be a dilemma- If in reality their would come a time that giving up land would actually bring peace (lets just imagine, theoretically). And with that said, would you think that giving up land would be justified if we knew for sure that it would bring better stability and better security for Jews?