General Category > General Discussion
I Was Just Interviewed By WBAI Radio!
AsheDina:
--- Quote from: Lisa on October 14, 2008, 11:08:14 PM ---Thanks, CJD, Bullcat and Ben Yehuda.
--- End quote ---
You did good- they ALWAYS pull Vietnam out of their A.. WHY? Thats ALL they GOT.
2honest:
Is it possible to download or hear it again?
SavetheWest:
--- Quote from: Masha on October 16, 2008, 03:21:46 AM ---
--- Quote from: NorthWestJTF on October 15, 2008, 10:52:55 PM ---That is terrific and you held your ground really well!!!
:clap:
In regards to body armour for the troops, I would bring up that the underlying issue is that President Clinton cut the military so dramatically that Bush had to respond to a diminished military and build it up over a number of years. Also, no president will be able to forsee every challenge in the country and wars in the past were fought with much less or incorrectly routed resources. The armour problem was addressed and when troops in WW2 didn't have needed resources or the French incorrectly took on German troop advances, people then didn't harp on the failures. They learned from them and focused on the enemy. The focus on partisan nitpickings while we are at war with a ruthless, brutal enemy is folly and dangerous.
Also, I would challenge the idea of terrorism. I would say that terrorism is a tactic of the weaker side but the bottom line is we have a war of ideals, peoples and religions. We should yield the right to use terrorism against an enemy if they do not follow the rules of war. (This would be one approach)
You could also say that McCain was drafted and America fought an enemy with imperfect resources and there was no smart bomb technology. Also, that McCain had targeted civilians is actually a completely disproven charge that not even the left wing mainstream media or the Obama campaign have taken on.
--- End quote ---
These are all very good, knowledgeable points, but the problem with using this line of argument is that it implicitly concedes this Geneva Convention BS. We should never accept these draconian and anti-Western so called "standards." If we need to induce collateral damage during a military operation in order to best advance our tactical goals, we must!
--- End quote ---
I'm totally on board with what you're saying but even with these rules, the Muslim terrorists still are the ones in the wrong. So even by these leftist, NWO programs, the Muzzies are still in violation. I think 99% of those international agreements are terrible becasue the left then frame them as "international law." There are no international laws, just agreements that countries have signed or agreed to. The Left is trying to make the World Court a major worldwide insitution and are using cases that everyone can agree on to make the case for its need. They have focused now on Rwanda. Now, most people would say that the people in the genocide should be taken to justice. The problem is that they get everyone on board for a "common sense approach", just like with the Brady Bill and then launch their real agenda. They will then use these courts against America and Israel, AS SOON AS I'M SITTING HERE.
MasterWolf1:
Is there a clip to this
Lisa:
I suppose if you go on their website you might be able to find something, but I have no interest in hearing myself.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version