General Category > General Discussion
BBC online article on judaism looks like it's written by a muslim.
q_q_:
Muman, back to copy/paste I see, and confirms what I already said in an earler thread, that you just look for excuses to paste bits of torah randomly. No real reasoning.
it's a shame that you feel I knocked your teshuva!
I have criticised you on a number of things, but not that.
As I already said, you fail to understand the category of statements that are made.
muman613:
--- Quote from: q_q_ on October 22, 2008, 10:28:51 PM ---Muman, back to copy/paste I see, and confirms what I already said in an earler thread, that you just look for excuses to paste bits of torah randomly. No real reasoning.
it's a shame that you feel I knocked your teshuva!
I have criticised you on a number of things, but not that.
As I already said, you fail to understand the category of statements that are made.
--- End quote ---
q_q_,
You make statements without any factual basis that is the problem. This whole threat was simply a speculation you made without any statements which back it up... Well, that makes it just your opinion.
I stand by my assertion that you have not proven that this article was written by a muslim and have failed to convince me that you had any intention of proving it. It seems you enjoy posting stuff like this and yet you always see fit to speak derogatorily towards people like me who always seek to post supporting material to show my points. And yes, cut & pasting information from other links is a valid way to back up my points.
--- Quote ---And I won't even mention muman in the context of discovering judaism rather late!
--- End quote ---
What is it you are implying in this statement? You seem to think I have over-reacted to this statement.
muman613
q_q_:
To quote myself.. which funnily enough you quoted anyway.
"As I already said, you fail to understand the category of statements that are made."
You fail even to understand what it is that you fail to understand.
If you can't explain what I mean, then you can't even agree or disagree with me.
I could add a note to my posts saying "not for muman". Or "for a certain class of intellect". But you cannot understand it, that's for sure.
note- and you don't mind taking the odd statement out of context, but I have yet to see if you make a habit of it. I doubt it, but for other reasons!
muman613:
--- Quote from: q_q_ on October 22, 2008, 11:48:29 PM ---To quote myself.. which funnily enough you quoted anyway.
"As I already said, you fail to understand the category of statements that are made."
You fail even to understand what it is that you fail to understand.
If you can't explain what I mean, then you can't even agree or disagree with me.
I could add a note to my posts saying "not for muman". Or "for a certain class of intellect". But you cannot understand it, that's for sure.
note- and you don't mind taking the odd statement out of context, but I have yet to see if you make a habit of it. I doubt it, but for other reasons!
--- End quote ---
q_q_,
Only you are smart enough to understand what you are saying. Anyone looking at this conversation would say you basically haven't said anything. Either you have trouble understanding simple english, like "I stand by my assertion that you have not proven that this article was written by a muslim and have failed to convince me that you had any intention of proving it." or "You make statements without any factual basis that is the problem.", or you just want to be argumentative. I am inclined to believe the later because nobody could be so intellectually challenged.
There must be something good which is coming out of this banter. I know in a way you are being humorous and this is so unbelievably hilarious. Almost 16 years ago I was involved with flame wars on the USENET networks with people like you. You could learn a little more than you think you know. And the knowledge you learned in the Koran isn't helping your presentation.
Do you think you can explain the "category of statements" which were made? In your original post you were perplexed because they mentioned kippahs or skullcaps. I dont find this that shocking because many people identify the Jews with head-coverings. You mentioned that the article says: "Judaism has experienced many changes since the time of Moses". This is not unusual to me either.
The only statement of the ones you mentioned which I contest is : "This external display of absolute commitment and devotion is the very essence of Jewish faith.". This statement is obviously not true as anyone who studies Torah realizes that outward appearance of devotion is not always indicative of righteous intention. This idea comes from a perversion of understanding the nature of Torah wisdom. I agree that this statement sounds like it describes Islam to me. I think Muslims are too concerned with the external display of commitment and devotion.
But does this mean that it is written by a Muslim? I dont know if there is enough evidence to support this idea. Maybe it is, maybe it is not...
muman613
q_q_:
I could just quote myself again because I already answered you.
And AGAIN, it just shows that you don't understand what I wrote and you don't even understand what it is that you don't understand.
I won't repaste what I wrote into this post because you don't even deserve that.
You are going to have to do something yourself.
You are going to have to read my posts and locate the answer. I'll even help you do it.
Go and look at page 1 of the thread, Reply #7, after the text "<snip>", it deals with your accusation directly.
You won't understand it, but that is the answer to you anyway.
And if you do get as far as finding it and you think you understood it, then explain why you missed it the first time..
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version