They are called "liberals" because they want evil people to be "liberated" to do whatever they want to do. They basically take the Noahide laws and make them the opposite of what they are:
2. Blasphemy: You are encouraged to be a blasphemer because the official religion of liberalism is atheism, which is blasphemy. Blasphemy would be the official protocol of a liberal government, ridiculing religious values in general and monotheism in particular.
Well, if you are talking about Islamofascist friendly Arab racial supremacist friendly pseudo-liberal cryptofascistocommunists, you are wrong. They start off from the position of appearing antagonistic to religious ideas but that is only a beginning tactic, to try to elicit broad based support, by seeming to espouse secularist democratic values. In the initial phase, they are intending not to secularize society, which is what they claim to be doing but what they are actually doing, is seeking to neutralize legitimate liberal, legitimate conservative and legitimate socialist religious voices of authority within society, particularly when they follow core judeo-christian values. Once they have that done, what that do, is to do an 180 degree u turn and demand all sorts privileges for the most nasty and aggressive manifestations of Islam. The British Labour Party Government in England actually tried to introduce a law, in which people could be put in prison for saying Islam is a rubbish, religion. The way the British Parliament works is that the lower chamber makes the law but the upper chamber, the House of Lords, has a power to demand changes. After the House of Lords kept rejecting the law, there is a right that the British Government have, when a law is rejected a number of time by the house of Lords to force that law in to effect without approval by the House of Lords, but they would have had a public relations problem doing that, in that the law had been highlighted by the house of lords as an unjust law. So the British Government, that is the Labour Party allowed the House of Lords to pretty much turn the law in to a useless piece of paper by making changes to it and in this this way, the Labour Party was saved the embarrassment of forcing a law in to effect, which the House of Lords had exposed as a tyrannical instrument to assert the supremacy of Islam over the British people and other alternative embarrassment of withdrawing the law entirely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_and_Religious_Hatred_Act_2006Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer