NATO, Kosovo, and Tamil Eelam
(warning: terrorist website link)http://www.tamilnation.org/saty/9904nato.htmIs any amount of intervention by the dhimmi West ever sufficient to placate Muslim Nazis? Here, we see this Tamil piece of dog excrement actually having the nerve to claim that the Nazi Atlantic Terror Organization wasn't truly pro-Albanian!
The coming months will show the fate in store for the Kosovars. The truth is that in so far as Kosovo is concerned, Milosovich's Yugoslavia and NATO are not that far apart. They are both opposed to the creation of an independent Kosovo. Neither of them want a Muslim Greater Albania in the heart of Europe. (If only that were really true.) They both proclaim their support for a multi ethnic Kosovo within a multi ethnic Yugoslavia. They both wish to retain the existing territorial boundaries of Yugoslavia. The degree of autonomy is a matter of emphasis.
...Why then did NATO launch its air attacks on Yugoslavia? When confronted with this question, NATO spokesmen assert that in the face of Slobadan Milosovich's refusal to sign the Ramboulliet Accord (which was intended to protect the Kosovars) they had no other option. But is that right?
If NATO was concerned to protect the Kosovars from attack by the Milosovich regime, why did not NATO pay heed to the views of Albanians such as Professor Qosja (HaRav Meir Kahane zt"l was right: Muslims are the eternal malcontents.) who, in recent years has become a father figure of the Albanian nation:
"...The international community, the European Union and the United States, still think they can solve the question of Kosovo by ensuring human rights and autonomy within Serbia. This shows that they do not understand the issue involved and approach the problem of Kosovo in a superficial manner. If they understand the essence of the issue, they would realise that public order, peace and justice can never be established in Kosovo until it is united with Albania..." (Interview with Rexhep Qosja quoted in Kosovo : In the Heart of the Powder Keg - East European Monographs, No 478 - compiled and Edited by Robert Elsie, distributed by the Columbia University Press, 1997)
Why was NATO unwilling to recognise that public order, peace and justice can never be established in Kosovo until it is united with Albania? (What more do Muslims want!?! America destroyed an innocent nation on their behalf and they're still not happy!) Why was NATO willing to launch air attacks against the sovereign state of Yugoslavia to 'save the Kosovars', but was unwilling to create a union of Kosovo and Albania where the Kosovars may live with the security afforded by their own armed forces? If the answer is that NATO was unwilling to countenance the dismemberment of a sovereign state, why were NATO countries only too willing to recognise the separation of Croatia from Yugoslavia a few years ago? What did NATO have in mind?
Topic: 10 Yrs. Ago: Tamil Muslim Nazi Says NATO Isn't Sufficiently Pro-Muslim!!! (Read 408 times)