The Inevitably Marxist Zoo - By Michael Moriarty

[MarZutra]

http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0809/0809marxistzoop15.htm

The Inevitably Marxist Zoo XV: King George Soros

By Michael Moriarty
August 24, 2009

The "Rainbow Elite" of Tom Wolfe's "Radical Chic" has been a power base ultimately consolidated by the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama volleyball game with the White House.

Had Hillary Clinton won the election in 2008, a Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton ownership of the Oval office would have looked … uh … "fishy" … and we all know how important it is for the bipartisan Progressive Movement to root out anything that looks "fishy".

The sudden arrival of "The One" seems to have saved the Progressive Day and its 100 year-old game plan.
Cartoon

Cartoon by Robert Minor in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in 1911. Karl Marx surrounded by an appreciative audience of Wall Street financiers: John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, John D. Ryan of National City Bank and Morgan partner George W. Perkins. Immediately behind Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.

This 1911 cartoon featuring Karl Marx being fawned upon by Wall Street moguls, this Capitalist/Communist love affair, this agreement to share a totalitarian power over the "Collective" … hmmm … it is all coming true, largely thanks to George Soros and Saul Alinsky.

Alinsky, the Marxist, gave Barack Obama the formula for Revolutionary "Change" that a number of Obama's best friends "can believe in". George Soros, perhaps Obama's best friend, gave the Presidential candidate all the money and influence he would need in order to defeat even "the most influential man in the world", Bill Clinton. Plus, of course, Bill's wife, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

We're not talking sky's-the-limit poker but end-of-the-universe power games.

The Progressive Club's formula, used by both the Clintons and the Bushes, has never been so fully articulated and boldly put into action than by the Soros/Alinsky prodigy, Barack Obama.

Recently the increasingly Cheshire cat expression upon the face of George Soros and his sphinx-like silence about what is going to happen to the economy – an outcome he is sure of but unwilling to share – well … look at that cartoon again!

Karl Marx's Gang of Capitalists!

Replace the "Perkins" figure with Jeffrey Immelt, the head of General Electric … and therefore ruler of its subsidiary, NBC … and then replace Marx with Barack Obama … and, well, all that's missing are the intellectual and monetary powers above the gathering, the Red-winged angels of Saul Alinsky and George Soros.

The best-laid plans of both King George and George Soros are now facing similar Tea Parties!

Who will come out on top? George Soros or George Washington?

If we pull back the veil from the Progressive Movement, we are obliged to see its totalitarian aims.

The Progressives and their hidden, long-term eugenics strategies, begun by the Supreme Court's revolting opinions in the Buck v Bell and Roe v Wade decisions, are the ultimate products of a turn of the century Liberalism that became infected with the Victorian Francis Galton's dream of a Super Human Race. Fin-de-siècle Vienna and that city's broiling intellectual and artistic explosions captured much of this growing nightmare.

Vienna's cross-breeding of Liberalism with racial supremacy theories, matched by Wall Street's clandestine admiration for Marx's totalitarian grip upon the "intelligentsia" … out of this a wealthy and American Radical Chic created the euphemism of "Progressive".

Hitler's horrific inhumanity in 1940's Europe forced the intellectual supremacists, or "enlightened despots" as Voltaire would have labeled them had he been alive at the time, to go underground. To call themselves Liberal was safe … but it was only half the story.

America's elbow-rubbing with supremacists of any kind created its own secret elite … and that "Radical Chic" is now "Progressive".

George Soros admits to having been partly raised by Nazi's in Hungary. His ability, as a teenager, to somehow accommodate his Jewish roots with his errands for the Third Reich … hmmm … such a genius – and I believe it would take genius to rationalize a genocidal contradiction in terms - such complexity is required in order to succeed simultaneously as a Marxist and the most successful Capitalist in the Free Market. He is renowned for almost "breaking the Bank of England".

If you examine the cartoon one more time, the God of Marxist Capitalism sitting above Wall Street is George Soros.

King George of the Marxist, English-speaking world!!

A recent Hotair blog "tip", based upon a bloomberg.com article, has revealed a … well … uh … gee … rather convenient pair of economic events involving first a George Soros "repositioning" of Brazilian oil stock … and then, surprise/surprise, a $2 billion Obama/taxpayer's loan to Brazil's off-shore drilling plans which, of course, insure a gold rush boom for the same oil company in which Soros had just "repositioned" his shares, an Obama/Soros investment in an offshore drilling practice that Obama has forbidden to Alaska.

"Fishy?"

Naw! It's something that has existed, as the cartoon shows you, since 1911.

Progressive Marxist-Capitalism!!

For readers still trying to figure that oxymoron out, first read Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism. It's the gentleman's introduction to the inevitable snake pits of American Progressivism.

After one hundred years of designing the Progressive, thousand-year plan for the entire human race, what began as a necessarily subtle intrigue has now blossomed into trillion dollar games with American taxpayers' money, plans to federalize the entire American healthcare system and a Progressive lobbyist's zoo that has transformed itself into an environmentalist's blackmail scheme.

The Progressive game plan is based entirely upon a scientific philosophy that has not only removed the human race from any survival priorities but actually reduced it to an "enemies list", concentrated, at least for this seminal moment, upon old people.

Thinking the unthinkable?

Yes, and the Progressives, in their foreign affairs meetings where nothing is or can be "attributable", have been thinking the unthinkable for so long, it no longer seems … to them, at any rate … to be unthinkable.

It is now: "What must be done!"

Sound familiar? ESR

Michael Moriarty is a Golden Globe and Emmy Award-winning actor who starred in the landmark television series Law and Order from 1990 to 1994. His recent film and TV credits include The Yellow Wallpaper, 12 Hours to Live, Santa Baby and Deadly Skies. Contact Michael at [email protected].

[AsheDina]

Right, kill the EVIL 'capitalists'

Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky---oops, we're not suppose to KNOW about this....


RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

[MarZutra]

good post!...  G-d it is maddening isn't it.  I told you the elections were a total criminal fraud.  It wouldn't have made any difference who got in.  John T. Flinn pointed this out in 1955: "Fascism will come at the hands of perfectly authentic Americans." and "The faces and rhetoric change but the policies remain the same..." 

[AsheDina]

good post!...  G-d it is maddening isn't it.  I told you the elections were a total criminal fraud.  It wouldn't have made any difference who got in.  John T. Flinn pointed this out in 1955: "Fascism will come at the hands of perfectly authentic Americans." and "The faces and rhetoric change but the policies remain the same..." 

MarZutra, I believe ALL people should know this 'rule system' and we should make rules of our own to counter attack- after all, most Americans are SHEEP

[cjd]

good post!...  G-d it is maddening isn't it.  I told you the elections were a total criminal fraud.  It wouldn't have made any difference who got in.  John T. Flinn pointed this out in 1955: "Fascism will come at the hands of perfectly authentic Americans." and "The faces and rhetoric change but the policies remain the same..." 

This is very true but it now seems things have been taken to a different level. In the case of the shvartza President we still don't really know if he has the credentials to hold office constitutionally speaking. Up recently it at least appeared that things were being run by some rule of order. In the past year it now seems anything goes in the name of national expediency.