To pee or not to pee ...

[pennyjangle]

This is a GOOD idea. 
     

TO  PEE OR NOT TO PEE --Words of wisdom from an unknown  person:


Like most folks in this country, I have a job. I work,  they pay me.

I  pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes

as it sees   fit. 


In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine   test (with which I have no problem).


What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes  to people who don't have to pass a urine test. 

So, here is my question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their  BUTT----doing drugs while I work.


Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? 

I guess we could call the program "URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"! 


Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.  Hope you all will pass it along, though. Something has to change in this country - AND SOON! 

P.S.  Just a thought, all politicians should have to pass a urine test too!  [/b]

[syyuge]

Another Transformer theory which perhaps talks about Generation of urine and its Socialist Redistribution.

[rhayat1]

It would be a step in the right direction.   Ultimately, I'd like to see government simply return to its constitutional limits and not distribute welfare at all; it's not the job of government to "get people back on their feet".  It's the job of private citizens to do this.  It's the job of people to take care of their elders, of Jews to take care of other Jews, of Christians to take care of other Christians etc.  In general, people are generous.  Let them keep their own money and you'd be surprised how resourceful they can be when it comes to charity.