The evil Nazi supporters

[RationalThought110]

http://www.nukeisrael.com/index4d.html

They praise Hitler all over the site. 

[Ultra Requete]

I got sick for looking at their site; put them in one cage with their belowed muslims.

[mord]

LOL they hardly have any members

[MassuhDGoodName]

Re:  "...LOL they hardly have any members..."

That's what they said about Hitler, who only had 18 members who met each week in a beerhall.

[EagleEye]

The difference, as sick as Hitler was, he was somewhat "charismatic."  These guys will never grow into anything.

[MassuhDGoodName]

Re:  "...The difference, as sick as Hitler was, he was somewhat "charismatic."  These guys will never grow into anything..."

He wasn't considered "charismatic" during his rise to power....just the opposite; the world media all denigrated him as "a clown"..."a comic figure with funny moustache"...etc.

Those who disparage nascent Nazi movements lack an understanding of human nature...

It is not necessary to have a majority of a population be Nazi card-carriers; nor is it necessary to have a large Party Leadership.  Neither is it necessary to have a particularly "charismatic" Fuhrer to appeal to voters...

All that is really necessary for such a movement to succeed, is to have a large number of the population agree with the same ideas expressed by the party, to have the majority of the remaining population apathetic to their socio-political-economic environment, and to then have an economic downturn serious enough to cause voters to look outside the mainstream for new answers to their problems.

The U.S.A. in August, 2007, lacks only the economic depression for completion of this formula.

Otherwise, all of our socio-economic and political realities strongly resemble those of The Weimar Republic of Germany in the 1920's / 1930's.

However, the U.S.A. is a billion times more violent, a billion times more sexually degenerate, and a trillion times more uncivilized, than was Germany prior to Nazism.

[EagleEye]

All that is really necessary for such a movement to succeed, is to have a large number of the population agree with the same ideas expressed by the party, to have the majority of the remaining population apathetic to their socio-political-economic environment, and to then have an economic downturn serious enough to cause voters to look outside the mainstream for new answers to their problems.

This I agree with.  But if someone did it,  it wouldn't be this website.  They are stupid, even for nazis.

[newman]

Remember that hitler did not come to power in a stable, affluent germany.

He rose to power at a time of economic chaos.

America is affluent and stable now, but if it degenerates into chaos, who knows who could rise to power.

[EagleEye]

Maybe right-wing Kahanist Gentiles could take power next depression.

[MassuhDGoodName]

Re:  "...Maybe right-wing Kahanist Gentiles could take power next depression..."

Following World War II, Communist Parties assumed power in most of the eastern European countries, even before Soviet troops arrived to "make sure they continue on the right path".

This occurred because the Communists were the only political group ready to immediately take the reins of government, due to their being extremely well organized and disciplined.

Should a political vacuum occur in the West, whichever ideological group provides the quickest and surest return to "Law & Order" stands the best chance for success.

This is a history lesson from the late 1940's post-War Europe to which JTF members should give serious thought.

[EagleEye]

It seems a well-marketed and charismatic movement can steal power in times of failure.  The minute things go downhill is the chance to seize power.  That way you'll get support from desperate people who may not support you otherwise.  You have to convince people that a right-wing, pro-Israel, and anti-pc movement is going to alleviate their pain and suffering.

[Ultra Requete]

Re:  "...Maybe right-wing Kahanist Gentiles could take power next depression..."

Following World War II, Communist Parties assumed power in most of the eastern European countries, even before Soviet troops arrived to "make sure they continue on the right path".

This occurred because the Communists were the only political group ready to immediately take the reins of government, due to their being extremely well organized and disciplined.

Should a political vacuum occur in the West, whichever ideological group provides the quickest and surest return to "Law & Order" stands the best chance for success.

This is a history lesson from the late 1940's post-War Europe to which JTF members should give serious thought.

That was the case with WWI Russia, bolsheviks (who were financed and brought to Russia by Kieser's Germany) promised the land to pesantry and peace for soldiers; those chaotic powers teared old Russia apart and created socio-politicall chaos they used to take power. In Eastern Europe aside from Yugoslavia that was not the case; In Poland "polish" comunists rided on soviet tanks along the Soviet secret police NKWD, SMIERSH etc... who imidietly started to to hunt Polish patriots; the civil war only ended with last Partizan captured in 1962. There were no autonomus comunists movemnets in eatern Europe aside Tito.