Islamic 'History' : All of History is the History of Islam

[muman613]

It is obvious from the way that muslims behave that they think that every Jewish figure in the Torah was actually a muslim, from Adam to Moses... This is why they constantly are rewriting history, and saying that there never was a 'Jewish' Temple on the Temple mount. This article from INN sheds some light on this evil trait of our enemies.


Expert: There is an Islamization of History and Geography

Professor Moshe Sharon of the Hebrew University explains: Islam's basic attitude is that all of history and geography are Muslim.
Elad Benari & Hezki Ezra
Professor Moshe Sharon, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, took part on Sunday in the Holy Temple Conferences by the Movement for Temple Renewal with the participation of leading temple organizations.

During the conference, which took place in the Great Synagogue in Jerusalem, Prof. Sharon warned against the attitude of Islam to history and geography.



“The basic attitude [of Islam] is that all history is, in fact, Islamic history,” Sharon told Arutz Sheva. “That means that all the major figures of history are Muslims, from Adam down to our own time.”

Sharon said that this attitude assumes that any Jewish or Christian religious figure, be it the Jewish Kings David or Solomon and even the Christian Jesus, is in fact a Muslim figure, a fact that essentially dismisses any Jewish or Christian claim that is faith-based.

According to the Muslims, says Sharon, “Since the creation of the world there has been only one religion and that is the religion of Islam. So if anybody says, for example, that there is a place connected with Solomon and that’s the place where Solomon’s Temple stood, a true Muslim would tell you: ‘Yes, you’re absolutely right, but don’t forget that Solomon was a Muslim.’”

He added, “You can understand that through Islamization of history you’ve got Islamization of geography. Anywhere that was connected with these prophets, which were all Muslims [according to Islamic attitude], becomes Muslim territory.”

Sharon said that from Islam’s point of view, their appearance in history was that of a liberator, that is to liberate all the Muslim areas, according to their belief, that Jews or Christians took over.

“There is no Islamic occupation,” he said. “If somebody occupied anything, it will always be somebody else, not the Muslims. There’s no Islamic occupation, there’s only Islamic liberation.”

[muman613]

Here is a good example of a muslim website which is preaching islamic rewrite of history, claiming that history was actually made up by the Greeks and Romans. What is exceptionally creepy about this link is that the author completely ignores the Jews, not a single mention of Jews impact on history. Of course to real muslims Jews are of the devil.


http://i-epistemology.net/history/1129-toward-the-islamization-of-history-a-historical-survey.html

Toward the Islamization of History: A Historical Survey         
N.M.M.Mahroof

 History, or more properly the writing of history, had been during the times of the ancient Greeks and Romans an elitist activity, meant for glorifying the class of power, position, and birth. Parts of these histories were fabulous in nature. The Muslims (Arabs) introduced the idea of history as factual record. During the Middle Ages, history writing slipped into what it was in the Greco-Roman times. In the 16th century, the middle class, those with accumulated capital, wrote histories. A colonial history, too, developed, enshrining a European view of history that still continues in school curricula. The 20th century saw changes. The writing of history became an imperialist necessity. When imperialism collapsed, the focus disappeared. History became miniaturized and atomized. The entry of television and information technology brought instant histories. Islamic history writing accepts history as an instrument of Allah's will and mode of living the good life.

Generally, mankind is and has been concerned with history. How could it be otherwise? The desire to be remembered and to shape experience are powerful incentives. Of course, writing from an entirely neutral perspective is not possible. All observers have explicit and implicit agendas. This article's goal is to note and analyze these agendas and to show how the historical slant has grown decidedly Euro-American.

[briann]

This really annoys the heck out of me.

I cannot stand history revionism.  Its evil at its purist form.

[syyuge]

In reality, even the Makha does not belong to them. They are the plunderers of the earth.