Author Topic: The Suit: It Doesn't Make the Man  (Read 97 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Dan Ben Noah

  • Forum Administrator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4882
  • Mashiach now!
The Suit: It Doesn't Make the Man
« on: January 17, 2012, 04:51:34 PM »
By Rabbi Moshe Ben-Chaim from mesora.org

Society is impressed more with man’s
appearance, than with his values. While
Judaism includes laws of dress, they must be
understood. Other than modesty, honor,
cross-dressing, and dressing as idolaters (as
they dress in their religious rites) G-d did not
include a dress code as a Torah law.

Dress & Appearances

Dressing for Sabbath and holidays is not to
“make the man,” but to give honor to the day.
In this fashion, man develops respect for G-d’s
chosen days and focuses on G-d’s acts which
we commemorate at those times. It’s all about
G-d. In no manner is this dressing up to honor
man. No one would suggest that by changing
one’s external garments, that he has perfected
his internal ideas and values. Prohibitions on
cross-dressing eliminate lewdness; prohibitions
of idolatrous dress break our identification
with this idolaters’ practices, and modest
dress removes the focus from ourselves so we
focus on G-d. This is all reasonable. Thus,
dress carries no inherent value. But within
Jewish communities, this is not the case.
Today, Jews categorize their own brothers
and sisters into superficial categories. “Does
he wear a black jacket or hat?” “What type of
yarmulke does he wear?” “Does she wear
jeans skirts?” “Does he have a beard?” These
questions are asked to determine the “hashkafa”
or outlook of the person. But I ask, what
type of “outlook” is related in any way to one’s
garments? This is truly superficial. In fact, it is
the flaw of insecurity that propels individuals
to associate with only those who appear like
them. If however, one was firm in his or her
Jewish values, such a person would care
nothing about what others say. They would
associate with upright Jews, regardless of their
dress. They would disassociate with corrupt
Jews, again regardless of their dress. Further,
one violates a halacha d’oraisa (positive
command) of “Viahavta l’ra-acha comocha”
(Lev. 19:18) – “thou shall love thy neighbor as
thyself” – when one passes these judgments or
prevents a shidduch (a match) if one is a
convert, divorced, black, not Sephardic or
Ashkenaz, and the like. This is a despicable
trait, which must be removed from one’s value
system.
As always, when one desires to follow what
is in accord with the Torah, one must look into
the sources, not to what people say, or what is
popularly believed or performed.
Jacob gave a gift of a coat of striped colors
(Radak, Gen. 37:3) to his son Joseph. Joseph as
well didn’t abstain from wearing that garment.
Both Jacob and Joseph realized that wearing a
colored garment is not a “religious” issue. Had
Jacob known the tragic outcome of demonstrating
his favoritism towards Joseph in this
manner, perhaps he would not have expressed
it. But this does not mean that Jacob felt that
the garment per se was a problem; the reaction
of the brothers was unforeseen. The priests as
well are commanded to wear colored
garments. We find in Exodus 12:35 the Jews
following Moses’ command to ask the
Egyptian’s for their garments. Rashi points out
that the clothing was valued by the Jews more
than the gold and silver vessels. It is clear: there
is no law concerning wearing types of
garments, even those of other nations (as long
as the garments are not of religious practice).
And we are not to add to the Torah by opposing
these sources and wearing specific
clothing as a “sign of religiosity.” In fact,
clothing cannot affect our perfection.
The conscious act of wearing “specific”
clothing to distinguish one’s self, is a violation,
and is not part of Torah. One who is truly
righteous, is humble, and does not seek an
audience or applause for his good deeds: “And
humbly shall you walk before G-d (Micha
6:8  ).” G-d is his only concern, for only G-d
determines truth and what is of value. His
sense of reality is not human applause, but
G-d’s word alone. Zephania 1:8 records
certain Jews who were punished by G-d due to
their wearing of “malbish nachri” (foreign or
strange garments). In his final interpretation,
Radak describes the sin of those Jews:
These men made themselves to look separate
and righteous, and they wore strange
garments, unlike the rest of their brethren, so
that they should be recognized through their
clothing as distinct individuals, but their ways
are evil.
Radak states that one is evil when parading
his righteousness. In Samuel I, 1:16, G-d tells
Samuel to go to Jesse, for “He (G-d) has seen a
king for Himself among his sons.” Interestingly,
G-d does not tell Samuel which son.
Why? G-d desired that Samuel learn a lesson
simultaneously with G-d’s selection of the
new king. Upon Samuel’s arrival at the house
of Jesse, Samuel admires Eliav. G-d tells
Samuel:
Do not look at his appearance or his height,
for he is despised, for it is not as man sees.
Mans sees with his eyes, but G-d sees what’s
in the heart.
G-d is teaching us not to pay attention to the
superficial information quickly assumed with
the eyes. This is not the real person. The
person, as G-d says, is what is in the heart.

Lineage

Kings David and Solomon descended from
Ruth the Moabite. Joshua married Rachav the
harlot. Moses married Zippora – a woman
whose father previously practiced every form
of idolatry. Ruth partook of greatness, as she
exemplified modesty to such a high degree.
G-d therefore selected her to be the mother of
our greatest kings. G-d never rebuked Moses
or Joshua for marrying people with such
backgrounds. At the time of marriage, these
individuals were living the correct philosophy.
That is all G-d is concerned with.
Imagine how much more peace there would
be if we studied the Torah and kept to the
teachings without distortion or projection,
instead of operating out of false, destructive
notions. We would have more ahava (love)
towards one another. Remember why G-d
destroyed Noah’s generation, and sustained the
generation of the dispersion. As Rashi stated,
“great is love, and hated is argument.” We
must stop fabricating false categories about
our own brothers and sisters. Instead of
looking for reasons to degrade a Jew, look for
reasons to love someone and appreciate their
real worth. Certainly, we must all abandon
false notions regarding dress.
G-d knows the perfect system for man, and
included in the Torah only those commands
which, if followed exactly, will yield the only
perfect life. Any addition or subtraction is a
defect in the system. Did the Creator of the
heavens and Earth, who designed every aspect
of the human personality, miss a point? Did He
forget to include something in the Torah? Of
course this is absurd. As there is no command
to wear specific garments, it must be a destructive
practice, as Radak teaches.
A person is what’s inside, not outside.
Jeremiah 16:19 O LORD, my strength and my fortress, my refuge in time of distress, to you the nations will come from the ends of the earth and say, "Our fathers possessed nothing but false gods, worthless idols that did them no good."

Zechariah 8:23 This is what the LORD Almighty says: “In those days ten people from all languages and nations will take firm hold of one Jew by the hem of his robe and say, ‘Let us go with you, because we have heard that G-d is with you.’”

Offline Ephraim

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: The Suit: It Doesn't Make the Man
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2012, 08:05:35 PM »
 That was a good read! How long have you been a Noachide? You know a lot about torah!
And thou, son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel, his companions. And take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim and all the house of Israel, his companions.

Online muman613

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 15908
  • 'May G-d make you like Ephraim and like Manasseh,'
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: The Suit: It Doesn't Make the Man
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2012, 08:29:13 PM »
One aspect that the Rabbi did not mention is that it is commanded that Jewish men, when wearing a four corner garment, must affix tzit-tzit {fringes} to the four corners. There is much written in the Talmud about the laws of how to make tzit-tzits. Although there is currently a machlokes concerning the blue dye which the commandment also includes today most Jews do not wear tzit-tzits with the blue dye. I do know some who do wear tzit-tzits with techilis {blue dye} and some day I may also but today I do not wear tzit-tzits with techilis.

One of the reasons we wear tzit-tzits is to remind OURSELVES that we are supposed to keep the commandments. While outsiders may consider this an act of outward piousness it is not intended as such. As the commandment clearly states it is so that we may see them and remember all of the commandments.

http://www.chabad.org/multimedia/media_cdo/aid/386067/jewish/Tzitzit-Tallit.htm
muman613
And I turned to see wisdom and madness and folly, for what is the man who will come after the king, concerning that which they have already done?And I saw that wisdom has an advantage over folly, as the advantage of light over darkness.The wise man has eyes in its beginning, but the fool goes in the darkness, and I too know that one event happens to them all. (Kohelet 2:12-14)

Online muman613

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 15908
  • 'May G-d make you like Ephraim and like Manasseh,'
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: The Suit: It Doesn't Make the Man
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2012, 08:47:18 PM »
I find this article from Torah.org explaining why Jews wear what they wear to be informative.



http://www.torah.org/learning/rabbiwein/5767/tetzaveh.html

Jewish Clothing

The emphasis in this week’s parsha on the clothing of the kohanim – the priests of Israel of the family of Aharon – raises the issue of “Jewish clothing” as practiced throughout the ages. The vestments of the kohanim were divinely ordained and their exact description undoubtedly contains within it realms of spirituality and service to G-d and man. These garments were meant to reflect “honor and glory” on those who wore them- and to the entire household of Israel. In fact, in Second Temple times, when there was no longer any remaining anointment oil that could be used to inaugurate the kohanim into the service in the Temple, the Talmud teaches us that donning the vestments of the priesthood was deemed to be sufficient to officially install them into their holy positions.

Thus, to a great extent, clothing made the person. As such, I feel that it is quite understandable that Jews always placed a great stress upon what clothing they wore and how they dressed. Naturally, the type and style of “Jewish clothing” varied in different ages and locations. The Jews of Persia and Iraq did not wear Polish fur trimmed hats nor did Polish Jews wear head scarves or turbans. The Jews of Amsterdam in the seventeenth and eighteenth century wore triangular cockaded hats and the Lithuanian rabbis of the nineteenth century wore gentlemanly tall silk top hats. But the common denominator to all of this is that, from the time of Moshe onwards, Jews attempted to dress distinctively, albeit always within the confines and influences of the surrounding general population.

“Jewish clothing” was always meant to be modest, neat and clean. It was to be an “honor and glory” to the wearer and the Jewish society. The Talmud speaks very strongly against Torah scholars who are somehow slovenly in the appearance of their clothing. Poverty was never allowed to be an excuse for stains or dirt on one’s garments. In the Temple, the used clothing of the kohanim was still considered to have an element of holiness to them even if they could no longer be worn. Wicks for the candelabra were fashioned from them.

Clothing was never looked at as being a purely inanimate object. After all, the first clothing for humans was fashioned for Adam and Chava by G-d Himself, so to speak. Ill treatment of clothing was deemed to be a punishable offense. King David, in his old age was not warmed by his clothing any longer. The Rabbis attributed this to the fact that he mistreated the clothing of King Saul earlier in his life.

I think all of the above helps explain the importance that clothing, the type of individual “uniforms” that Jews in the world and here in Israel, play in our communal and personal life. Each of us and the groups that we belong to attempt to wear clothing that will be an “honor and glory” to us individually and to the group collectively. We should therefore not only treat clothing with respect but we should respect as well the wearers of those different types of clothing that conform to our traditions of modesty and Jewish pride.

Rabbi Berel Wein
muman613
And I turned to see wisdom and madness and folly, for what is the man who will come after the king, concerning that which they have already done?And I saw that wisdom has an advantage over folly, as the advantage of light over darkness.The wise man has eyes in its beginning, but the fool goes in the darkness, and I too know that one event happens to them all. (Kohelet 2:12-14)