Well we all knew that they have no problem with taking the masculine role in sodomy, but I didn't know they could come up with justification for "taking it" in addition.
The vast majority of Western homosexuals are just as bad.
Hmm... if they fall under the previously mentioned category, certainly, but they don't justify their immorality by promising to kill themselves and some innocent people and calling that morality. In a way I guess though, because they both say something Helen Keller could see is immoral moral. Two sides to a coin that they believe pays for their sin; western defeatism: "G-d (who I [they] hate) made me this way and there's nothing I can do, and I'm proud of it" and muslim domination: "G-d made me to kill infidels, so I'm proud to serve as Alla's slave in every aspect, including gay sex which is totally only just because I'm doing the right thing."
In a way it's different. Gays certainly have expressed no intention of saving the world's gays from oppression, just pushing those who do something for them to do more. Muslims have, instead, expressed every intention to save the world's infidels from freedom and sanity.
So, in the end, how dare you call those muslims that. At least they're not also traitors.