General Category > General Discussion

Will someone destroy islam already?

<< < (66/194) > >>

syyuge:
David Cameron accused of betraying Syrian rebels:

Syria's top rebel commander has accused David Cameron of betrayal after the Prime Minister abandoned plans to arm the Syrian opposition.

General Salim Idris, the head of the Free Syrian Army, said the decision would "leave us alone to be killed" by President Bashar al Assad, and pave the way for al-Qaeda to dominate the rebel ranks.

Mr Idris hit out in an interview with The Daily Telegraph after Downing Street confirmed that Mr Cameron had ruled out arming the opposition on advice from the British military. The government had previously hinted that it was strongly considering it, successfully lobbying two months ago for an end to the European Union arms embargo.

One source suggested that such rhetoric had simply been part of a plan by Britain to encourage Damascus to take part in the forthcoming Syria peace conference in Geneva, scheduled for later this summer.

"This was never about arming the rebels," he said. "It was simply a diplomatic bargaining chip to say to Assad: 'if you don't come to the table, we can arm the rebels'."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10180820/David-Cameron-accused-of-betraying-Syrian-rebels.html

Small arms may not be a big problem for the muslamic terrorists and rebels, as the Saudi and Quatar are already supplying it to them.

syyuge:
Britain could still arm the Syrian rebels, William Hague says:

Britain could still arm the Syrian rebels, William Hague has insisted, provoking accusations of confusion at the highest level of Government.

The Foreign Secretary's comments appeared to contradict reports earlier this week which claimed that David Cameron had decided against the move. Senior military figures had apparently warned him that sending small arms and missiles would make no difference to the conflict either way.

Addressing a committee of MPs, Mr Hague said Britain had not ruled out sending weapons to opposition forces, despite concerns they could fall into the wrong hands or prove largely ineffective.

Pressed by MPs, Mr Hague said the Government had made “no decision to send arms to the Syrian opposition”, but added: “Equally, we haven’t ruled out any option. Any reports that we have ruled anything out are not correct.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10183445/Britain-could-still-arm-the-Syrian-rebels-William-Hague-says.html

It is all a confusion, confusion and confusion. Nato is confused whether the muslamic terrorists shall be supported or not and if yes, then how and how much.

Supporting the muslamics has not helped anybody on this earth so far. Even if this is done inadvertently it will be a counterproductive exercise.

Nato should support the muslamics so much that they go on to the war but not so much that they are able to return from the war.

syyuge:
Syria refugee crisis as bad as Rwanda genocide, UN says:

The number of people fleeing Syria has escalated to an average of 6,000 a day, the worst such rate since the 1994 Rwandan genocide, according to the UN.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10183899/Syria-refugee-crisis-as-bad-as-Rwanda-genocide-UN-says.html

Oh! I was thinking that the muslamic terrorist infighting has to be much severe than this.

Israel Chai:

--- Quote from: syyuge on July 17, 2013, 08:00:17 PM ---Syria refugee crisis as bad as Rwanda genocide, UN says:

The number of people fleeing Syria has escalated to an average of 6,000 a day, the worst such rate since the 1994 Rwandan genocide, according to the UN.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10183899/Syria-refugee-crisis-as-bad-as-Rwanda-genocide-UN-says.html

Oh! I was thinking that the muslamic terrorist infighting has to be much severe than this.

--- End quote ---

Full speed ahead muzzrats.

syyuge:
Army Chief's warning of Syria no-fly zone meaning war 'needs to be taken seriously':

General Sir David Richards, the outgoing head of the Armed Forces, has warned of the perils the UK faces if it is to implement a no-fly zone over Syria, says Con Coughlin.

  In an interview with the Telegraph, his last before standing down as the Chief of Defence Staff, General Sir David Richards, said that for a no-fly zone to work, all of Syria's air defences would need to be taken out, which would be tantamount to "declaring war" on the country.

Prime Minister David Cameron and Foreign Secretary William Hague have pushed for a more significant military intervention in Syria, such as introducing a no-fly zone to tackle the escalating bloodshed.

In May, Mr Cameron demanded an end to the EU arms embargo to give him more options.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10185837/Army-Chiefs-warning-of-Syria-no-fly-zone-meaning-war-needs-to-be-taken-seriously.html

At least Nato should not take any step, which stops the protracted war of muslamic infighting.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version