Black Man Wears Ku Klux Clan Robe To Bring Attention To Black on Black Crime

[Confederate Kahanist]

Boy!!

That sure is intimidating: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CCo5Q4tkk6I

[USAReturn2GodNow1776]

I like this guy. But he is promoting misinformation. His case is even better than he realizes if you take into account the lies about lynchings:

http://theinjusticefile.blogspot.com/2012/01/blacks-who-lynched-blacks-truth-behind.html

If you take into account that lynchings were the way violent crimes were dealt with a long time ago in the South and that black people for whatever reason commit violent crimes at higher rates, a different picture emerges.

Myth I:

Prior to the Voting Rights Act (1965), white people, particularly in the South, would routinely round up black men who tried to vote ... and LYNCH them.  Not true.  Didn't happen.  I cannot find ONE verifiable newspaper account of such an event. If it did happen, it was one of a few events at most ... and likely happened between the Reconstruction years –1865 to 1878.  Of further note is that in 1963, 43% of all eligible blacks in the South were registered to vote. There were voting "irregularities" mainly in Mississippi and Texas. (SOURCE: Chronological History Of The Negro -- year 1963)

Myth II:

More blacks were lynched in the South because that's where most of the racist white people lived. Not true. The large disparity in lynchings in the South compared to the North is mainly due to whites and blacks in the South living a far greater degree of geographic racial separation.  In other words,  when a black man committed a rape or murder in his black southern community, blacks had little desire to march - on foot - the black perp miles and miles to the white sheriff. The perpetrator was lynched by blacks.  And, of course, blacks would have also not bothered to report the incident to the local white sheriff. When found dangling by white people, the lynched black became just another hanging black man, which was then reported in the local newspaper. The Tuskegee Institute, or the NAACP Crisis, would be notified of the incident through the newspaper ... then "apply" a reason for the lynching e.g. arguing with a white man; trying to vote, etc.   

Myth III:

White people lynched 3,446 Negroes between 1882 and 1968.  Not true.    The overwhelming majority of lynched blacks were in fact lynched by blacks.  Also, the 3,446 figure has been reduced significantly downward --to around 2500.

Myth IV:

All the blacks lynched were innocent people...who were lynched because they were black and white people were racists. Absolutely NOT true.  Virtually every case I could find where the ones doing the lynching were white,  the lynched victim was 100% guilty of the accused crime. Here is a small sample of some of the terrible crimes committed by blacks against innocent white people LINK

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Great find.

[Super Mentalita]

Interesting....

[angryChineseKahanist]

He's helping his own fellow blacks.
Stop being delusional. He could very well hate the white cracker and da jooooooooooooooooooooo.

[Confederate Kahanist]

Stop being delusional. He could very well hate the white cracker and da jooooooooooooooooooooo.

What makes you think that?

[Super Mentalita]

He's helping his own fellow blacks.
Stop being delusional. He could very well hate the white cracker and da jooooooooooooooooooooo.

I don't really believe thats his intention if you ask me...

[USAReturn2GodNow1776]

I don't really believe thats his intention if you ask me...

Notice that what he is not doing is dressing up in a kkk suit and comparing 'blacks' to klansmen for killing people of a DIFFERENT 'race'. You would never see that kind of self-criticism from such a racial national socialist community. Only 'whites' do that.

'whites' => racial masochists; work in the interest of everyone; I have no respect for that.

all other 'races' / ethnicities => racial national socialists to one degree or another and 'blacks' most of all; work in the interest of its own group; I can at least respect them.

[Ulli]

Boy!!

That sure is intimidating: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CCo5Q4tkk6I

I think he does a great contribution to the black community. It makes absolutely no sense not to speak about the truth, because with this you will never find solutions.

In lots of cases blacks have blamed for their misery the society, whites or in general others and this was assisted and supported by leftist activists. They intended to inhibit the emancipation and integration of black in the major society in order to get voters for leftist political parties and they suceeded in the USA very well. All changes start with the speaking of the truth.

[angryChineseKahanist]

because I have yet to see a negro truly calling himself an American instead of seeing everyhing as race this race that.
fine if he wants to stop black on black crime.
everytime I think I found a good negro he proves one way or another to be not what I expect.
everytime I hear one of these self critical negros, its only to the benefit of their own superior kind.

[Rubystars]

because I have yet to see a negro truly calling himself an American instead of seeing everyhing as race this race that.
fine if he wants to stop black on black crime.
everytime I think I found a good negro he proves one way or another to be not what I expect.
everytime I hear one of these self critical negros, its only to the benefit of their own superior kind.

Unfortunately I've noticed this too. There's a couple of phrases for this "The inner chimp always comes out" and "you can take the black man out of the jungle but you can't take the jungle out of the black man." However those phrases sound really bad to people if you say them, even though in my experience with black people it has been true. I wish that these things didn't pan out, and that we could just be free to assume that someone from that background has the same chance of being a bad seed as anyone else.

Case in point there was a black girl that worked with me and I respected her because she didn't joke around much, she seemed to have a really good work ethic, she seemed to have a decent sense of morals, etc. and she was pretty intelligent and seemed like a nice person. I was surprised, and so were many of our coworkers, when she was caught stealing shoes. She had put them in a drawstring bag that she would carry out. She got several pairs of shoes before she was caught with them.

I don't take any pleasure in coming to this conclusion or for having the stories turn out this way. I think all people have equal value at birth, but since we live in this flawed world we have to be realistic in that we can't expect that people from certain cultures are going to behave in the same way as others would in a given situation.