Latest Benghazi memo reveals evidence of Top-Level cover up

[muman613]

Not surprising considering what we knew at the time about the nature of the 9/11 terrorist attack. The administration was so concerned with winning the 2012 election they covered up the brutal murder of an American ambassador. I personally believe that this horrible event is an impeachable offense. That the stupid president actually went to bed that night in order to wake fresh for a golf game that day makes me want to scream. And that lying piece of work Mrs Clinton covered for the administration by saying 'What difference does it make?' when testifying before the senate committee.

I hope Mrs Clinton realizes that Americans are not that stupid to allow a traitor to this country to occupy the highest office again. Obama and his fascist administration will come to an end and hopefully soon.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/05/10/benghazi-emails/2150103/

Benghazi memo edits show State, White House involvement

A top State Department official pressed the CIA and the White House to delete any mention of terrorism in public statements on the Benghazi terror attack to prevent critics from blaming lax security at the consulate, according to documents obtained by ABC News.

The information "goes right to the heart of what the White House continues to deny," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told USA TODAY. "For eight months they denied there's any manipulation, but this continues to shed light on something that was never true."

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement to USA TODAY on Friday that the changes were made to prevent members of Congress from "providing more guidance to the public than the administration."

Victoria Nuland, spokeswoman for the State Department, said she was expressing the concerns of her "leadership" when she emailed that a CIA memo on Benghazi should remove references to the attacks links to al-Qaeda and CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.

According to ABC News, Nuland objected in an email to White House and intelligence officials that the CIA description "could be abused by members (of Congress) to beat up on the State Department for not paying attention to warnings."

The "talking points" memo on what the Obama administration should tell the public was the basis for statements made by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, who appeared on talk shows five days after the Sept. 11 attack to explain what happened.

.
.
.

[cjd]

The sad fact is that despite all the increased attention the issue seems to be getting very little traction with the American people... If this were a Republican administration it would never have survived the last election however here we are months later and with most of the facts well known still no overwhelming outrage is present... Clearly the demographics of the country have shifted in a way that the bulk of the population find this sort of politics acceptable... The sad fact of the issue is that this ambassador was a fellow democrat and a close friend of the administration... If this administration treats it's friends like they did the ambassador what value do the American people honestly believe this president puts on them?

[drlmg]

I have noticed a lot of people making the implication that the main issue here is that people were lied to. It doesn't surprise me at all that this administration lied, they do it constantly..... I actually believe they lie and obfuscate more often than being honest and forthright.

The real issue here is that people were allowed to die so oBumma wouldn't have to admit there is such a thing as islamic terror and that his "humanitarian" mission to spread democracy was a big lie. Also I believe arms were being funneled to islamists or something similar was (and is) going on and oBumma's image was more important to him than people's lives.

[muman613]

Short, Sweet, and to the Point...

[muman613]

[muman613]