Dear Chaim,
I would like to know if you thought the Gulf War was a good or bad idea.
A result of it, the focus basically taken off of Iran and too much was put onto Iraq. Before the Gulf War, didn't the US still consider Iran to be a major threat from the hostage crisis that occurred during Jimmy Carter's administration?
Was the Gulf War really worth taking the focus away from Iran and putting too much onto Iraq?
It turned out to be a lie that Saddam's government had ordered for babies in Kuwait to be murdered. Kuwait's government hired a public relations company to represent a group called "Citizens for a Free Kuwait"
By the time the hostage crisis occurred in Iran, the US should have realized that it would be necessary to become energy independent from "Middle Eastern Oil." If not then, it should have been realized by the end of the Gulf War.
If the US became energy independent then, who controlled oil in the "Middle East" wouldn't have been a concern.
I think that the Gulf War was primarily to defend Arabia from losing any control of its oil to Iraq.
The US thought it would be undesirable for Iraq to dominate a large proportion of "Middle Eastern oil." However, why was it seen as any better for Saudia Arabia to dominate a large proportion of it?
If Iraq invaded Saudia Arabia, I think it would have resulted in a long war (like the Iraq-Iran war) between the two countries and the US could have stayed out of that.
Just like the US government wants to claim that Saudia Arabia is an ally in dealing with Iran, wasn't the same true with Iraq in that they were considered allies in the 80's?
Why is Saudia Arabia seen as any more moderate as Saddam's government? If the latter then become considered as part of an "axis of evil", then why wasn't Saudia Arabia's government also considered part of an "axis of evil"? Doesn't Saudia Arabia help finance the Taliban and Al Qaeda?
It seems like the bias of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Texas Oil Companies with OPEC, had a clear bias in favor of Saudi Arabia and James Baker III supports CFR and Big Oil.
So in summary, do you think the US should have got involved in a potential war between Iraq and Saudia Arabia rather than defending Saudia Arabia from Iraq? Do you think one of the consequences of that war was that focus was taken away from Iran and onto Iraq? Was Saddam's government really a threat right before the Gulf War started?
If the Clinton's were truly concerned about energy independence, like Hillary Clinton wants people to think, her husband's administration would have took action to make the US independent of foreign oil, because it should have been concluded after the Gulf War that the US military should not have to get involved in a war to defend oil for a foreign country.