Newman, please be respectful to our Christian members. While I understand where you are coming from, we have to be careful not to word things in a way that
#1) comes off sounding disrespectful to Christians on the forums
#2) does not use cursing or inappropriate language to disrespect the Torah, G-d forbid.
"Nivil peh" - "filthy mouth" is one of the confessions on Yom Kipur and is seen as a sin. The Rambam speaks about it in his Hilchois Deos. Most editions will give you the Talmudic sources if you need them. There is a lot in the Torah about Guard Your Mouth.
You have been more and more vocal against our Christian members and I would like you to back off. I would also like you to clean up your lewd or suggestive speech on the forum. This is a warning. I cannot allow this.
I would, respectfully, like to respond to this from a Christian perspective.
Please allow me to post a disclaimer. I am not a Christian. I have studied Christianity for many years because I have Christian family members. These arguments have been thoroughly debated with many knowledgeable and educated Christians from the lifelong practitioner to the full fledged minister and pastor.
Let me begin. Jesus said:
Mathew 5:17
17 Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. 18 For truly I tell you, UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS AWAY, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, will be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Are heaven and earth still here? I believe so. I do not think we would be alive and under these same rules if heaven and earth did not exist. Whatever "fulfill" means, it does NOT mean to do away with. Further evidence is provided here:
Psalm 119:88
89 Your word, O LORD, is eternal;
it stands firm in the heavens.
90 Your faithfulness continues through ALL generations;
you established the earth, and it endures.
91 Your laws endure to this day,
for all things serve you.
92 If your law had not been my delight,
I would have perished in my affliction.
93 I will never forget your precepts,
for by them you have preserved my life.
94 Save me, for I am yours;
I have sought out your precepts.
95 The wicked are waiting to destroy me,
but I will ponder your statutes.
96 To all perfection I see a limit;
but your commands are boundless.
Obviously, G-d is not constrained by the limits of time and space. If G-d says "Eternal", then you better believe it means forever in the human sense.
Why would Hebrews be so harsh and push for the obeying G-d and then Romans is so simple and almost seems to teach AGAINST following the 613 Jewish laws? Simple, because Romans was written for Romans who are gentiles and are not supposed to follow (nor were they ever supposed to follow) the 613 commandments. Hebrews was written for Hebrews (Jews) who are supposed to follow the 613 mitzvot as an eternal covenant and therefore were never "off the hook" so to speak.
The problem is made many times by applying all of Paul's letters to all audiences and this is, clearly, a mistake. Oversimplification and a lack of education of the Tanach (Christians would know this to be the "Tanach") would cause these difficulties. If you do not understand the foundation, then errors like this become more common.
Lastly, if Jesus was supposed to be sinless, by what "standard" was he sinless? The "New Testament" had not been written yet. Obviously, he would have to go by the 613 laws in the Torah. For example, why would you need to dunk people in water (mikvah), keep the Sabbath (and he did keep the Sabbath against the argument of healing on the Sabbath which would be allowed if to save human life), teach in synagogue, or all the others to be obedient to G-d if the New Testament hasn't been written yet? If Jesus didn't die on the cross yet (i.e. for himself), then even if you believe in replacement theology, he would have to go by the commandments that his Father had already laid out. This is only reasonable.
Again, I am not a Christian so I do not believe in this theology. I would, simply, like to provide an argument that, even from a Christians perspective, Jesus did not come to do away with G-d's commandments. I'm not sure what "fulfill" means, but it does not mean a license to sin against G-d's perfect Torah.
I would also like to state that I care deeply for our Christians members and that you are important to us. I hope that we can all be an example of what it's like when we can come together for a common (and awesome) goal.