Cruz ALLEGEDLY cheated on his wife according to the National Enquirer

[Joe Gutfeld]

There is a story in the National Enquirer that Ted Cruz cheated on his wife with several women.  I don't know if it's true, but it's the story that is now going around on-line. 

[Zelhar]

You say you don't know if true yet your title is as if this is a fact.

1. Don't repeat evil rumors like they are fact!
2. The sex life of a candidate like any other person are within the realm of privacy. 

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

Once again, EDIT YOUR THREAD TITLE

[syyuge]

The supporters of both the candidates are attacking their wives for their external shapes. The game is turning dirty even on the outer surface. Both sides shall eschew from such lumpen ideologies. If such practices are continued then no doubt Obama may remain the life President.

[Zelhar]

Attacks against Melania Trump didn't come from Cruz's side.

The supporters of both the candidates are attacking their wives for their external shapes. The game is turning dirty even on the outer surface. Both sides shall eschew from such lumpen ideologies. If such practices are continued then no doubt Obama may remain the life President.

[syyuge]

Attacks against Melania Trump didn't come from Cruz's side.

You may be quite correct, but then who in your opinion are responsible.

[Zelhar]

The ad featuring a nude Melania Trump was published by the "Make America Awesome" superpac. They are not associated with Ted Cruz in any way but they are by their own definition anti Trump.

Make America Awesome is a SuperPAC dedicated to blocking and reversing Donald Trump’s political ascent. We are an independent group, and are not authorized by any presidential candidate or candidate committee. Our focus is on using unconventional and cost-effective tactics, as opposed to stereotypical high-cost, limited-yield methods with the objective of providing maximum donor value.

You may be quite correct, but then who in your opinion are responsible.

[syyuge]

The ad featuring a nude Melania Trump was published by the "Make America Awesome" superpac. They are not associated with Ted Cruz in any way but they are by their own definition anti Trump.

Thanx for clarification.

[angryChineseKahanist]

The National Enquirer is something you see at the checkout line in the supermarket.  It is not to be taken seriously.
They always talk about UFOs and the ghost of Elvis.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

At least he would be condemned for it if true.

Unfortunately, this is not the case in some specific communities. I'd let people guess what communities in referring to.

Lying piece of garbage.  All Jewish communities would condemn a cheater.

And we already saw that the liberals, atheists, seculars, leftists, and many many Christians excused the womanizer Bill Clinton for his romps in the white house in addition to his actual ABUSE of women.    So you can try to scapegoat Jewish groups all you want but no one is buying it.  We see the corrupt morals of society and it doesn't stem from Judaism.

[Zelhar]

People who like the NE, people who like and believe Alex Jones, this is the demographics of the hard core Trumpsters.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

I wonder where did I mention the word "Jewish" in my sentence?

Speaking of Bill Clinton:
http://nypost.com/2014/10/11/clinton-era-e-mail-cited-jewish-law-as-defense-in-lewinsky-scandal/

I would also suggest reading this:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/adultery.html

I want to add that in my community it's frequent and never condemned. I'm not just popping thoughts out of bubble.

Lol once again you fail to comprehend what Jewish law is and what it means.  You quoted Reform deform movement adherents who tried to use twisted and obviously false logic to defend their political savior. 

Jewish virtual library correctly points out the legalistic parameters of what constitutes the Jewish sin known as adultery.  But you draw false conclusions from it to promote your gay liberal agenda.  It is laughable to suggest the legal definition of adultery makes what Clinton did acceptable.  Not even deformist Blumenthal even claimed that but you will twist literally anything.

Now you're going to pretend you live in an orthodox Sephardi community?  Lolololol. False accusations against their communities.  Such behavior not condoned by any interpretation  of Jewish law. Feminist making a joke of himself as always.

You are trolling the forum by hijacking every thread and twisting unrelated topics into your anti Jewish anti male talking points

[Joe Gutfeld]

Trump is bringing this up, but, he cheated on his first wife with the one who became his second wife.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

 
So you agree that wife is "husband's possession"?

I generally believe punishing women more severely than men for the same crime (irrelevant of how you interpret it) is repulsive to any rational human being. You certainly are not rational.

False.  Attempting to put words in my mouth, which I didn't say, is not going to help you. 

The sin of adultery was defined by the Torah which God gave us.  If you want to define it differently then you are speaking a different language.  And a different religion.
The penalty is really irrelevant as no one can issue the penalty anymore.  Why do you imply that only a crime with a death penalty attached is actually a sin in Judaism? This pet claim of yours could not be further from the truth. You are a liar and a fraud.

No, a person is not property, feminazi.

So now I'm "gay liberal" huh? I thought I'm a "missionary troll" and a "feminazi"

You are behaving as most of these things and spreading the ideas of most of these wretched things.  However I did not call you gay.  I only referred to the man-hating feminist propaganda you spread here as gay, but that was an imprecise swipe at your corrupt and phony message.  Calling it gay was not accurate although the gays and feminists are aligned politicially, I should rather have called it misandrist propaganda.  You did prove again you lack reading comprehension though.

So now you're contradicting yourself. First you accuse me of using deformed sources, now you claim deforms don't say that. Doesn't make that much sense, does it?

Try it again nice and slow.  You cited the evil Sidney Blumenthal as if that is some sort of evidence regarding Judaism or its laws.  He is a deformist Clinton operative. He has zero understanding of Jewish law, slightly above your level.  But you ALSO misinterpreted his comment and misled the forum into believing that his words imply Judaism is ok with Clinton behavior.  But it isnt.  Even he did not claim it but you implied that he did. It was sinful whether legally defined as adultery or any other legal definition of different sins.  A sin is a sin, which means it is not allowed.  You are a disgusting liar by presenting the falsehood that Judaism and Jewish communities condone cheating on spouses and as if that would be consistent with Jewish law.  It clearly isnt. And no one condones it.

You are clearly butthurt over something in your personal life, maybe some idiot told you the law allowed your father to cheat on your mother but if so he lied to you.  Get over yourself and stop trying to incite against Jews and their beliefs.

[ChabadKahanist]

The National Enquirer is something you see at the checkout line in the supermarket.  It is not to be taken seriously.
They always talk about UFOs and the ghost of Elvis.

I was going to say that but I will add it is also good entertainment while sitting on the can!!!

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

But that's exactly what Jewish Virtual Library says. So no, I didn't put anything in your mouth. 

Stop lying, you fraud.

The only thing I said Jewish Virtual Library was correct about was that the definition of adultery is when a married woman cheats on the husband (or when a man has relations with a married woman, which may or may not have been mentioned up until now but is also the case).     So if I didn't say anything else regarding Jewish Virtual Library except this definition, then some conclusion you jumped to from Jewish Virtual library's words, or even if Jewish virtual library said something else explicitly, it is putting words in my mouth to claim I said something I didn't .


Like a cheap propagandist wh0re you keep trying to reframe the debate by creating straw men like this and concocting statements which I never uttered in order to strike them down and claim Judaism is so bad by arguing against those statements which I never said.   Do you think people here are stupid?  Everyone sees through your cheap tactics.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

Where did I cite Sidney Blumenthal? A person who defended Clinton's behavior on religious grounds (and whom I cited) is Susanna Heschel, daughter of Rav Abraham Heschel.

 

1. You prove again you're an ignoramus because you have no idea who these people are.

Rabbi Heschel was a rabbi of the conservative movement and also served on the faculty of Hebrew Union College of the Reform movement.

Susanna Heschel is either Reform, or Reconstructionist or unaffiliated or who knows what, but she does not get association with the religious views of her father just because she is his daughter!  (But again, her father was not associated to the orthodox).

Here is more about her and her Islamic outreach efforts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susannah_Heschel

She does not represent the views of Judaism.  In fact, she represents feminism and some other strange ideas.   That she would offer help to defend Clinton by lessening the severity of his evil behaviors does not surprise me since the Deform movement redefined its ethics as whatever is convenient.  And whatever fits with the leftist agenda, such as feminism, gay agenda, Islam love, etc.   To them, those things transcend morals, yet here you are spouting feminist BS when it is your feminist fellow traveller Reformist Jews who excuse immorality in the name of supporting "the cause."

2.  You are again distorting.   This woman did not "defended Clinton's behavior on religious grounds" 

Leave aside that this lady does not even follow real Judaism and cannot possibly represent Jewish law.   Look at what you wrote:  "Defended Clinton's behavior on religious grounds"
In the article you cited, SHE DID NOT DO THAT.   

She stated that the crime is not as bad as adultery.  NOT that it wasn't a crime or a sin in Judaism. 

Then she questioned how Jews can criticize Clinton.   But that is the ethics of reformism speaking.   Real Judaism, practiced by orthodox Jews, does not say that sin is ok or certain sins are ok.   If halacha does not allow it, it's wrong for a Jew to do it.  Simple.



So again, why is it that you take a lady like this, a feminist who does not follow actual Judaism, and use her statement to the Clinton team as some kind of evidence of a problem with Judaism?    A more convoluted non-logic could hardly exist.     But that's because you are here with an agenda not because you really believe what you are writing.

[edu]

the feminazi using one of his aliases is back. I wish to remind everyone that SmashIslam until very recently was missionizing for the idolatry of Buddhism, which believes that women can not obtain spiritual enlightenment until they are reincarnated as men.
And he has the gall to call us Jews anti-women. He is a hypocrite, a villain, and he should  be banned from this forum.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

 
Where did I mention "orthodox Sephardi community"?

You have repeatedly slandered the Sephardi Jews and the halacha they follow as being abusive to women.   Repeatedly.  (which is of course false and you're a liar).  You barged into this thread, which is about Ted Cruz, and you implied that Jews would accept the behavior described by Enquirer, if it was true about Ted.  It is utterly false.   Judaism does not accept this, no matter what ethnicity its followers, sephardi, ashkenazi, or anyone else.

Now you of course will deny this because you specialize in obfuscating.   So I'll quote you to preempt your attempt to confuse the discussion again:

At least he would be condemned for it if true.

Unfortunately, this is not the case in some specific communities. I'd let people guess what communities in referring to.

We are not morons, and we saw your repeated slander and endless threads you opened up obsessing about the same topic so we know your comment is an underhanded attack on Jews, implying that we would accept this behavior of Ted if it were true.   Insane!

Also, why am I not allowed to criticize them? 

Is there anything you don't claim to be victimized by?    No one said you aren't allowed to do something.     But you also don't get to baselessly slander a whole group of people either.   If I refute your bullcrap, does that mean I didn't "allow" you to state it?  Uhhh, ok.

Why did I think you referred to them and implied that you lived among them?  Because of this comment:

I want to add that in my community it's frequent and never condemned. I'm not just popping thoughts out of bubble.

Coupled to your previous slander of Sephardi Jews in particular it made sense only to interpret that you are saying you live in Sephardi community which follows Judaism (And you know that Rambam guy you always point at?  He's involved in Judaism), that people cheat all the time on each other and it's somehow "never condemned."  This is insane.    But did you mean that your deformist community does this?    Well, if so, then of course they are not going to condemn anything, whether FOR or AGAINST Jewish law because Reform Jews Don't Follow Jewish Law. They don't even believe it's mandatory.   So how can you use their behavior as an example to bludgeon religious Jews and Judaism, when they, the reformists of "your community" don't even follow Judaism?      They don't follow Jewish law, nor rambam, nor any halachic authority.

And how is it an unrelated topic? The topic is about cheating, so are my posts. So don't accuse me of merely trolling any thread that is on my path.

The thread is about Ted Cruz and a seemingly fake story planted by National Enquirer to slander him as a cheater.  You used this thread as an opportunity to get on your soap box again and attack Judaism.     Now you will say you didn't do this.  So I'll quote you again to show you where you did that.

At least he would be condemned for it if true.

Unfortunately, this is not the case in some specific communities. I'd let people guess what communities in referring to.

And thus you devolved the thread into an anti-Jewish propaganda fest, when it is about something very specific and unrelated.

[Shlomo]

It's more complete garbage from Trump - who is too much of a coward to debate Ted Cruz.

The women have denied the National Enquirer's phony claims:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/women-deny-ted-cruz/2016/03/26/id/721024

Enquirer owner American Media Inc.'s CEO David Pecker, is a "close friend" of Trump, "flies to Florida on Trump's private jet" and is "personally involved in the anti-Cruz stories."

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/michael-savage-threatens-withdraw-support/2016/03/25/id/720939/

And last but not least, hypocrite Trump has cheated on his wives with other married women but no one seems to care... especially Trump supporters. They also don't seem to care that Trump's casino was the very first casino in the world to have a strip club AND a homosexual strip club inside of it.

[Debbie Shafer]

The National Enquirer is a supporter of Trump....Anyone who has to buy Trash magazines that are edited to draw in people to the fabrications and lies has no life.   Do you depend on this kind of trash for your entertainment?

[Joe Gutfeld]

But, it's not the first time a politican cheated on their wife/husband.  Remember Bill Clinton?