Author Topic: Hunters and gatherers  (Read 3572 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Hunters and gatherers
« on: October 07, 2007, 08:44:44 AM »
Anyone know any similarities or differences between ancient and modern hunting and gathering? 

In ancient times, I think they were more nomadic and more dependent on it for food.  In the few areas where hunting is still an active part of obtaining food, are the people as nomadic? 


Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2007, 02:19:18 PM »
I wish I could answer you, but I couldn't.

The big problem is that African savages are hunting all of the monkeys, apes, and other creatures they live amongst into extinction. They multiply like cats and dogs and the native animal populations cannot handle their constant massacres.

We pour so much aid down the rathole of Africa... can somebody tell me why we can't offer poor Africans $100 each (like income for six months for them) to have vasectomies? That would be much, much, much cheaper in the long run than what we are doing now.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2007, 06:31:10 AM »
In ancient times, hunting and gathering was the way of obtaining food.  In modern times, this isn't the case. 

Are there any other differences between ancient and modern hunting and gatherng?

Offline White Israelite

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4535
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2007, 09:33:03 AM »
I rather hunt food and eat it then obtain it from the grocery store, the food at the grocery store is injected with growth hormones and crap, unhealthy and some fat guy who itches his ass is probably handling the food anyways. I prefer to dress the food though I don't hunt. I think hunting is prohibited in Judaism if I recall. Is it possible to hunt kosher style?

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2007, 02:35:58 PM »
"The way that people get their food tells us a great deal about the nature of their culture. The method that people use to get food is related to the nature of the environment in which they find themselves. Food is critical to the survival of the group. Every culture must adapt to the social and physical environment in which it finds itself. This is particularly true with regard to the way that people get their food.

There are two categories of food getters:

Food Collectors: There is only one form of Food Collectors, and they are known as hunters and gatherers.

 Food Producers: There are three different types of food producing cultures: (1). Horticulturists; (3). Intensive Agriculturists; (3). Pastoralists.

In this chapter, we will examine the characteristics of each of these groups.

Food Collectors (Hunters and Gatherers)

By far the oldest method for getting food, food collecting is the subsistence technology that characterizes some 99% of human history. Until 10,000 years ago, when humans learned how to domesticate plants and animals, it was the only way that humans acquired food.

Food collectors, also called  hunters and gatherers, are those who get their food exclusively from wild plants and animals. At one time, prior to 10,000 years ago, food collectors lived everywhere. Today they exists in the marginal areas of the world, such as the arctic tundra, inaccessible forests and deserts. Hunters and gatherers are least likely to be found in temperate climates, where people get food from some sort of food production.

At one time, the lifestyles of food collectors or hunters and gatherers was incorrectly characterized as "nasty, brutish and short".  Furthermore, their lifestyle was considered especially difficult for the aged, leading some to commit senilicide (the killing of old members of the community). For the most part, this turned out to be a misconception. Research suggests that they work very little in order to feed themselves. On the average, hunters and gatherers work approximately 12-19 hours per week. Therefore, most food gatherers don't have to work very hard to get access to ample amounts of quality food, as well leis+ure time

Some other characteristics of food gatherers include the following:
 

   1.     They live in small communities of 25-50 people, called bands. Keeping the size of the band relatively small is an important priority for food collectors as they often move over large areas in search of food and water. If the size of the band became too large, their movement, and survival, may be impinged.
   2.     They live in sparsely populated areas, and do not have permanent settlements.
   3.     Their nomadic lifestyle allows them to moved in a fixed territory.
   4.     Individuals land rights are unimportant to many hunters and gatherers. Their concern is with the items on the land (the animals that they hunt, and the plants that they gather).The concept of land ownership is least likely among food-collectors.
   5. A division of labor exists that is based upon gender. The men do the hunting, and the women do the gathering.
   6. Today, most food in a hunting and gathering societies comes from fishing.

The following are examples of three hunting and gathering groups. Two are examples of desert environment food collectors, and one is an example of arctic environment food gathering group. (taken from Ember and Ember's Cultural Anthropology - Prentice Hall):

Ngatatjara Aborigines (Australia)

The Ngatatjara live in a desert environment, where the average yearly rainfall is about 8", and the temperatures in the summer can get up to 108 degrees Fahrenheit. They do not live in villages year round. Indeed, life for the Ngatatjara is characterized by nomadism, as they must change their lifestyle in search of food and water. In this environment it is the activities of the females as gatherers that contribute greatly to the diet of the Ngatatjara. As a result, the Aborigine diet consists mostly of plant food.An interesting and rather unique characteristic of the Ngatatjara is that the woman often balance jars of water on their heads when they go out gathering. The Ngatatjara change their lifestyles in response to the need for food and water.

Located in sub-Saharan Africa, the !Kung are probably among the best known and widely researched hunting and gathering groups in the world.  The map indicates their location. As desert environment hunters and gatherers, some 60% - 80% of their diet comes from vegetable food. On the average, they work about 12-19 hours per week to feed themselves. At one time, it was thought that the !Kung, as well as other hunters and gatherers, led a difficult and brutish existence. In fact, life for the !Kung is fairly good as they have an abundant amount of quality food and don't have to work very hard to get it.

Copper Eskimos (or Copper Inuit)

Eskimos, or Inuit, live in the northern arctic regions. The environment in which the Inuit find themselves is reflected in the nature of their culture. Their use of tools, including harpoons and fish hooks made from the animals that they hunt,  demonstrates the exquisite adaptation that this group has made to their environment. The range that these hunters and gatherers cover is noted on the following map.



The Copper Eskimos received their name from the fact that they fashioned tools by cold hammering copper nuggets. They are found in the area around Coronation Gulf in the Canadian arctic. Compared to the Ngatatjara, the Copper Eskimos change their lifestyle more in response to changes in season.

        Food Producer (Horticulturists, Pastoralists and Intensive Agriculturists)

We humans obtained  food by hunting and gathering for about 99% of our history. Approximately 10,000 years ago, a major change occurred when humans began the process of domesticating plants and animals. As a result of bringing the reproductive cycle of plants and animals under their control, humans no longer needed to depend upon hunting and gathering for survival. Animals and plants could now be gathered in one spot, raised and traded. In turn, this let to major cultural and social changes in nearly every aspect of daily life as people began to adapt to the new social and physical environment. As a result, most people in the world depend upon domesticated plants and animal as sources of food." 

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2007, 02:37:25 PM »
"The way that people get their food tells us a great deal about the nature of their culture. The method that people use to get food is related to the nature of the environment in which they find themselves. Food is critical to the survival of the group. Every culture must adapt to the social and physical environment in which it finds itself. This is particularly true with regard to the way that people get their food.

There are two categories of food getters:

Food Collectors: There is only one form of Food Collectors, and they are known as hunters and gatherers.

 Food Producers: There are three different types of food producing cultures: (1). Horticulturists; (3). Intensive Agriculturists; (3). Pastoralists.

In this chapter, we will examine the characteristics of each of these groups.

Food Collectors (Hunters and Gatherers)

By far the oldest method for getting food, food collecting is the subsistence technology that characterizes some 99% of human history. Until 10,000 years ago, when humans learned how to domesticate plants and animals, it was the only way that humans acquired food.

Food collectors, also called  hunters and gatherers, are those who get their food exclusively from wild plants and animals. At one time, prior to 10,000 years ago, food collectors lived everywhere. Today they exists in the marginal areas of the world, such as the arctic tundra, inaccessible forests and deserts. Hunters and gatherers are least likely to be found in temperate climates, where people get food from some sort of food production.

At one time, the lifestyles of food collectors or hunters and gatherers was incorrectly characterized as "nasty, brutish and short".  Furthermore, their lifestyle was considered especially difficult for the aged, leading some to commit senilicide (the killing of old members of the community). For the most part, this turned out to be a misconception. Research suggests that they work very little in order to feed themselves. On the average, hunters and gatherers work approximately 12-19 hours per week. Therefore, most food gatherers don't have to work very hard to get access to ample amounts of quality food, as well leis+ure time

Some other characteristics of food gatherers include the following:
 

   1.     They live in small communities of 25-50 people, called bands. Keeping the size of the band relatively small is an important priority for food collectors as they often move over large areas in search of food and water. If the size of the band became too large, their movement, and survival, may be impinged.
   2.     They live in sparsely populated areas, and do not have permanent settlements.
   3.     Their nomadic lifestyle allows them to moved in a fixed territory.
   4.     Individuals land rights are unimportant to many hunters and gatherers. Their concern is with the items on the land (the animals that they hunt, and the plants that they gather).The concept of land ownership is least likely among food-collectors.
   5. A division of labor exists that is based upon gender. The men do the hunting, and the women do the gathering.
   6. Today, most food in a hunting and gathering societies comes from fishing.

The following are examples of three hunting and gathering groups. Two are examples of desert environment food collectors, and one is an example of arctic environment food gathering group. (taken from Ember and Ember's Cultural Anthropology - Prentice Hall):

Ngatatjara Aborigines (Australia)

The Ngatatjara live in a desert environment, where the average yearly rainfall is about 8", and the temperatures in the summer can get up to 108 degrees Fahrenheit. They do not live in villages year round. Indeed, life for the Ngatatjara is characterized by nomadism, as they must change their lifestyle in search of food and water. In this environment it is the activities of the females as gatherers that contribute greatly to the diet of the Ngatatjara. As a result, the Aborigine diet consists mostly of plant food.An interesting and rather unique characteristic of the Ngatatjara is that the woman often balance jars of water on their heads when they go out gathering. The Ngatatjara change their lifestyles in response to the need for food and water.

Located in sub-Saharan Africa, the !Kung are probably among the best known and widely researched hunting and gathering groups in the world.  The map indicates their location. As desert environment hunters and gatherers, some 60% - 80% of their diet comes from vegetable food. On the average, they work about 12-19 hours per week to feed themselves. At one time, it was thought that the !Kung, as well as other hunters and gatherers, led a difficult and brutish existence. In fact, life for the !Kung is fairly good as they have an abundant amount of quality food and don't have to work very hard to get it.

Copper Eskimos (or Copper Inuit)

Eskimos, or Inuit, live in the northern arctic regions. The environment in which the Inuit find themselves is reflected in the nature of their culture. Their use of tools, including harpoons and fish hooks made from the animals that they hunt,  demonstrates the exquisite adaptation that this group has made to their environment. The range that these hunters and gatherers cover is noted on the following map.



The Copper Eskimos received their name from the fact that they fashioned tools by cold hammering copper nuggets. They are found in the area around Coronation Gulf in the Canadian arctic. Compared to the Ngatatjara, the Copper Eskimos change their lifestyle more in response to changes in season.

        Food Producer (Horticulturists, Pastoralists and Intensive Agriculturists)

We humans obtained  food by hunting and gathering for about 99% of our history. Approximately 10,000 years ago, a major change occurred when humans began the process of domesticating plants and animals. As a result of bringing the reproductive cycle of plants and animals under their control, humans no longer needed to depend upon hunting and gathering for survival. Animals and plants could now be gathered in one spot, raised and traded. In turn, this let to major cultural and social changes in nearly every aspect of daily life as people began to adapt to the new social and physical environment. As a result, most people in the world depend upon domesticated plants and animal as sources of food." 


Including the above and addition to it, how are ancient and modern hunters different besides the fact that in ancient times, it was necessary to do it?

Offline White Israelite

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4535
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2007, 02:39:36 PM »
"The way that people get their food tells us a great deal about the nature of their culture. The method that people use to get food is related to the nature of the environment in which they find themselves. Food is critical to the survival of the group. Every culture must adapt to the social and physical environment in which it finds itself. This is particularly true with regard to the way that people get their food.

There are two categories of food getters:

Food Collectors: There is only one form of Food Collectors, and they are known as hunters and gatherers.

 Food Producers: There are three different types of food producing cultures: (1). Horticulturists; (3). Intensive Agriculturists; (3). Pastoralists.

In this chapter, we will examine the characteristics of each of these groups.

Food Collectors (Hunters and Gatherers)

By far the oldest method for getting food, food collecting is the subsistence technology that characterizes some 99% of human history. Until 10,000 years ago, when humans learned how to domesticate plants and animals, it was the only way that humans acquired food.

Food collectors, also called  hunters and gatherers, are those who get their food exclusively from wild plants and animals. At one time, prior to 10,000 years ago, food collectors lived everywhere. Today they exists in the marginal areas of the world, such as the arctic tundra, inaccessible forests and deserts. Hunters and gatherers are least likely to be found in temperate climates, where people get food from some sort of food production.

At one time, the lifestyles of food collectors or hunters and gatherers was incorrectly characterized as "nasty, brutish and short".  Furthermore, their lifestyle was considered especially difficult for the aged, leading some to commit senilicide (the killing of old members of the community). For the most part, this turned out to be a misconception. Research suggests that they work very little in order to feed themselves. On the average, hunters and gatherers work approximately 12-19 hours per week. Therefore, most food gatherers don't have to work very hard to get access to ample amounts of quality food, as well leis+ure time

Some other characteristics of food gatherers include the following:
 

   1.     They live in small communities of 25-50 people, called bands. Keeping the size of the band relatively small is an important priority for food collectors as they often move over large areas in search of food and water. If the size of the band became too large, their movement, and survival, may be impinged.
   2.     They live in sparsely populated areas, and do not have permanent settlements.
   3.     Their nomadic lifestyle allows them to moved in a fixed territory.
   4.     Individuals land rights are unimportant to many hunters and gatherers. Their concern is with the items on the land (the animals that they hunt, and the plants that they gather).The concept of land ownership is least likely among food-collectors.
   5. A division of labor exists that is based upon gender. The men do the hunting, and the women do the gathering.
   6. Today, most food in a hunting and gathering societies comes from fishing.

The following are examples of three hunting and gathering groups. Two are examples of desert environment food collectors, and one is an example of arctic environment food gathering group. (taken from Ember and Ember's Cultural Anthropology - Prentice Hall):

Ngatatjara Aborigines (Australia)

The Ngatatjara live in a desert environment, where the average yearly rainfall is about 8", and the temperatures in the summer can get up to 108 degrees Fahrenheit. They do not live in villages year round. Indeed, life for the Ngatatjara is characterized by nomadism, as they must change their lifestyle in search of food and water. In this environment it is the activities of the females as gatherers that contribute greatly to the diet of the Ngatatjara. As a result, the Aborigine diet consists mostly of plant food.An interesting and rather unique characteristic of the Ngatatjara is that the woman often balance jars of water on their heads when they go out gathering. The Ngatatjara change their lifestyles in response to the need for food and water.

Located in sub-Saharan Africa, the !Kung are probably among the best known and widely researched hunting and gathering groups in the world.  The map indicates their location. As desert environment hunters and gatherers, some 60% - 80% of their diet comes from vegetable food. On the average, they work about 12-19 hours per week to feed themselves. At one time, it was thought that the !Kung, as well as other hunters and gatherers, led a difficult and brutish existence. In fact, life for the !Kung is fairly good as they have an abundant amount of quality food and don't have to work very hard to get it.

Copper Eskimos (or Copper Inuit)

Eskimos, or Inuit, live in the northern arctic regions. The environment in which the Inuit find themselves is reflected in the nature of their culture. Their use of tools, including harpoons and fish hooks made from the animals that they hunt,  demonstrates the exquisite adaptation that this group has made to their environment. The range that these hunters and gatherers cover is noted on the following map.



The Copper Eskimos received their name from the fact that they fashioned tools by cold hammering copper nuggets. They are found in the area around Coronation Gulf in the Canadian arctic. Compared to the Ngatatjara, the Copper Eskimos change their lifestyle more in response to changes in season.

        Food Producer (Horticulturists, Pastoralists and Intensive Agriculturists)

We humans obtained  food by hunting and gathering for about 99% of our history. Approximately 10,000 years ago, a major change occurred when humans began the process of domesticating plants and animals. As a result of bringing the reproductive cycle of plants and animals under their control, humans no longer needed to depend upon hunting and gathering for survival. Animals and plants could now be gathered in one spot, raised and traded. In turn, this let to major cultural and social changes in nearly every aspect of daily life as people began to adapt to the new social and physical environment. As a result, most people in the world depend upon domesticated plants and animal as sources of food." 


Including the above and addition to it, how are ancient and modern hunters different besides the fact that in ancient times, it was necessary to do it?

I don't think the necessity ever ended, there are many parts of the US where hunting is still a way of life for survival.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2007, 02:47:41 PM »

I don't think the necessity ever ended, there are many parts of the US where hunting is still a way of life for survival.

Could you explain? 


Also, what do you see as the main differences and similarities between ancient and modern hunter-gatherers?   

Offline White Israelite

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4535
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2007, 02:51:15 PM »

I don't think the necessity ever ended, there are many parts of the US where hunting is still a way of life for survival.

Could you explain? 


Also, what do you see as the main differences and similarities between ancient and modern hunter-gatherers?   


Food has always been a required source for humans and the natural world. As time advanced, we just obtained better tools for the job. Those that live in the cities have the super markets and fast food.

There are many parts of the United States, for example my grandparents who live all the way up North in Wisconsin with a very small population (1,000 or less). There are a lot of cottages and bars, most people survive off of fishing and deer meat. They use either bows or shotguns to obtain their food. I've also got a uncle who lives in Alaska who depends on hunting to survive as he lives out in the middle of no where.

While the need to hunt to obtain food as changed in recent history or even declined, it hasn't completely dissapeared. In many cases, hunting can be good for survival if one is ever stuck in a situation where they need a source of meat.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2007, 02:54:11 PM »


I don't think the necessity ever ended, there are many parts of the US where hunting is still a way of life for survival.



"Food Collectors: Labor in this group is organized on the basis of gender, where men do the hunting and women do the gathering. Hunters and gatherers do not need to work hard, as working hard will cause over exploitation of their natural resources. Instead, they carefully consider the carrying capacity of the land, (that is, the ability of the natural resources - plants and animals - on the land to support the people who live on the land). To hunt or gather more than they need to survive is pointless, as they don't  have the means for storing the surplus. Another interesting way to determine how hard a particular group works is to examine the daily activities of their children. In societies where intensive agricultural is practiced, children often are given many chores to perform. By comparison, according to Ember and Ember, the children of the !Kung have virtually no work.

Likewise, before they begin the days activities, they will carefully consider the animals they will hunt and the food they will gather in order to maximize the calories and nutrients they will receive  Anthropologists call this the optimal foraging theory."


Is all of this true among both ancient and modern hunters?



"Distribution of Resources

Once they have been transformed by way of tools and labor, goods and services must be distributed to members of  society. The method that a culture  uses to distribute goods and services is dependent upon the complexity of the society, and the number of people involved in the distribution effort. The three different methods that societies use to distribute goods and services to their members are as follows: Reciprocity, Redistribution and Market or Commercial Exchange.

    Reciprocity

Reciprocity, or "give and take", acts as a leveling device in many societies, insuring that no individual or group has an inordinate amount of goods and services at the expense of others. Often associated with relatively small cultures, reciprocity takes three different forms:

        Generalized Reciprocity: Practiced primarily among kin, generalized reciprocity is literally the giving of a gift without expectation for return, and is common among food collectors and horticulturists. When returning from a successful seal hunt, Eskimos will share the kill with all members of the band, without expectation of anything in return. Survival for small groups often depends upon the survival of the group

        Balanced Reciprocity: Balanced reciprocity is gift giving with the expectation of return immediately or within a limited time, and is practiced among groups of unrelated individuals. Examples of balanced reciprocity would include the distribution of goods and services by trade or barter. Unlike generalized reciprocity, parties involved in balanced reciprocity are expected to trade or barter items of equal value. Branislaw Malinowski's description of  the Kula Ring in the Trobriand Islands is an example of balanced reciprocity.

        Negative Reciprocity: Negative reciprocity is getting something for nothing, or for much less than it is worth. In its worst form it results in stealing. For example, if two people are trading partners, it is expected that they will each get something of equal value from each other (see balanced reciprocity, above). If, however,  partner one takes advantage of partner two by trading something of inferior quality, it is said that partner two is a victim of negative reciprocity, and may lose prestige in his community as a result. As bad as this may seem, negative reciprocity also serves as a leveling device by taking from someone who is perceived to have a great deal, and giving it to someone who doesn't have as much." 

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2007, 02:57:53 PM »
In Israel, there are still pastoral Jews. Judea and Samaria has Jews that practice a pastoral way of life on hilltops.

But all these ancient ways of living is intermingled with modern life in modern countries like America and Israel whereas in Africa, they are living like it isn't even The Stone Age yet.




Interesting.  Isn't Pastoral supposed to be different than hunting? 


"Pastoralists
       http://www.fao.org/NEWS/1998/980203-e.htm

Pastoralists are people who raise and herd domesticated animals. Pastoralism is hardly a unified phenomenon, as different animals are herded in different parts of the world. For example, cattle are herded in eastern and southern Africa, while camel are herded in North Africa and the Arabian peninsula. Likewise, reindeer are herded in eastern Europe and Siberia.

The following are some of the characteristics that pastoralists have in common:
 

   1. Pastoralists do not eat the animals that they herd.
   2. Pastoralists are nomadic, often moving from place to place with large numbers of people and animals.
   3. Families in societies do not own grazing land, permanent dwelling places, or land for cultivating crops. What they do own are their animals, as their animals are a major source of wealth for pastoralists.
   4. As they provide very small portions of their own food, Pastoralists depend upon trade with agriculturists in order to attain vegetables and meat in their diet.
   5. The difficult nature of their lifestyle, and the tough environment in which they are found account for the fact that many of them are very warlike.

The Bakhtiari from Iran are a example of a Pastoralists group. Large groups of men, women and animals make the twice yearly trek from their summer camp, called Sardsin, to their winter camp called a Garmsin."

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2007, 03:01:56 PM »
   


Food has always been a required source for humans and the natural world. As time advanced, we just obtained better tools for the job. Those that live in the cities have the super markets and fast food.

There are many parts of the United States, for example my grandparents who live all the way up North in Wisconsin with a very small population (1,000 or less). There are a lot of cottages and bars, most people survive off of fishing and deer meat. They use either bows or shotguns to obtain their food. I've also got a uncle who lives in Alaska who depends on hunting to survive as he lives out in the middle of no where.

While the need to hunt to obtain food as changed in recent history or even declined, it hasn't completely dissapeared. In many cases, hunting can be good for survival if one is ever stuck in a situation where they need a source of meat.
[/quote]


Do hunters still live in very small communities and are they very nomadic?  Do they own land?
Do Eskimos live in Alaska at all or just Canada?

Offline White Israelite

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4535
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2007, 03:14:04 PM »
   


Food has always been a required source for humans and the natural world. As time advanced, we just obtained better tools for the job. Those that live in the cities have the super markets and fast food.

There are many parts of the United States, for example my grandparents who live all the way up North in Wisconsin with a very small population (1,000 or less). There are a lot of cottages and bars, most people survive off of fishing and deer meat. They use either bows or shotguns to obtain their food. I've also got a uncle who lives in Alaska who depends on hunting to survive as he lives out in the middle of no where.

While the need to hunt to obtain food as changed in recent history or even declined, it hasn't completely dissapeared. In many cases, hunting can be good for survival if one is ever stuck in a situation where they need a source of meat.


Do hunters still live in very small communities and are they very nomadic?  Do they own land?
Do Eskimos live in Alaska at all or just Canada?
[/quote]

Ok ok, so that has changed...a bit, but I gotta admit it would be fun to live in a igloo.

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #13 on: October 08, 2007, 08:27:09 PM »


Ok ok, so that has changed...a bit, but I gotta admit it would be fun to live in a igloo.


I'm confused.  What are you saying has changed?

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2007, 09:04:46 PM »
Are hunters affected by governments or wars?

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Hunters and gatherers
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2007, 10:18:05 PM »


I don't think the necessity ever ended, there are many parts of the US where hunting is still a way of life for survival.


Tell me if this is accurate and if there should be any content added or taken out.


        Hunting has always been a part of the lifestyle of humans.  As other methods to obtained food were developed, the importance and necessity of hunting declined in most cultures.  With the growing methods of horticulture, agriculture and pastoralists as well as advances in technology, the hunter-gatherer way of life has declined. 


      In ancient times, hunting and gathering were the source for acquiring food.  The foraging way of life included a basic social community of approximately 25-50 people called a band, with all people in the group being related by kinship or marriage.   People often shift band membership since they are able to join any of the ones in which they have kinship, marital links, or fictive kinship.  A person acquires the rights to use a band’s territory by being born in the band or by joining it through a tie of kinship, marriage or fictive kinship.  A typical characteristic of hunters involved mobility.  Thus, ownership of land was not a priority because the highest concern was with what was being hunted and gathered on the land.  In addition, foragers lived in an egalitarian society, in which contrasts in prestige or wealth are minor; rather, social distinctions were determined by age. Also, men primarily were hunters while women gathered. Through the use of language and culture, hunting became a theme of myths, legends, stories and traditions.  Older members of bands usually had the responsibility of passing on the myths, legends, stories and traditions.   


         Since sharing is common among foragers, generalized reciprocity has been the method of exchanges.  In fact, they consider it to be unethical not to share their food supply.  They expect each other to share with other members of their band members.  They gather as much as they need because they are unable to store a surplus of food.  In cultures that mainly hunt and gather, children, teenagers and those over 60 are dependant on others.  Despite working a low number of hours and having a high percentage of dependants, foraging cultures are usually able to obtain enough food to share with their band.  In addition, hunter-gatherers are efficient since they carefully contemplate the animals they will hunt and the food they gather, to maximize the calories and nutrients from the supply.
     

       The food collecting way of life consisting of hunting and gathering, survived in environments where food production was difficult.  These including some islands, forests, deserts and very cold areas, where food production was impracticable with simple technology.  Also, in some areas where food production was introduced—such as indigenous hunters and gatherers in California, Oregon and Washington-- it was maintained because it provided an adequate and nutritious diet, with less work.  For instance, of those who hunt as their main source of food, they continue work an average of 12-19 hours per week.  In those environments where hunting gathering is especially productive, such as that of the Pacific Northwest coast of North America, hunter-gatherers are able to settle permanently.   

 

         Modern foragers have some dependence on food production or on food producers.  Also, regional forces such as trade and war, national and international policies and political and economic events have influenced them in the world system.  For example, the Eskimos of Alaska and Canada use modern-technology, including rifles and snowmobiles, in their subsistence activities.  However, this could create an inequality, as some may be better than others at using a snowmobile.  Similarly to hunters-gatherers, horticulturists are dependant a little upon other methods for obtaining food; they depend on hunting or fishing for part of their food supply.  For instance, Samoans supplement their diet by fishing.  The latter is a common source of food obtained by hunting.  In most cultures, hunters-gatherers live in nation-states, depend to an extent on government assistance, and have contact with outsiders such as food-producing neighbors as well as missionaries.  As the modern world system spreads, the number of foragers continues to decline.
   

        Modern hunters could be restricted through the rule of law.  For example, cultures may have laws that restrict what may be hunted, where it could occur and the quantity of game that may be hunted.  In the United States, hunters of protected species require the use of a hunting license in all states.  People who hunt recreationally participate in lobbying the federal and state levels of government.  These types of hunters tend to do so to enjoy the outdoors.  In addition, it provides an alternative to meat purchased from stores. 
   



      In conclusion, the role of hunting has transformed throughout history.  Once humans gained the ability to domesticate animals and plants, the need for hunting diminished; this resulted in people producing food through horticulturists, agriculturists and pastoralists. The role of food hunting gathering reflects the different natures among cultures and how people adapt to their specific physical environments.