Hannity claims arming Mujahideen was a success.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

He thinks the US should give weapons to Ukraine to fight Russia like Reagan gave the Muslim Nazis in Afghanistan weapons that beat the Soviets.

Even the liberal who made this video knows better than Hannity on this. He also says how Ukraine's Azov forces are Nazis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl_SHhH8w6g

[Ron]

My personal opinion on the war and America's involvement:

When NATO bombed Serbia to save the Muslim terrorist Mujahideen from the Serbs, Israeli foreign minister Ariel Sharon condemned NATO.

And for a good reason.

The United States government and the European Union claim to support Ukraine out of so-called opposition to aggression and tyranny.

At the same time they are obsessively trying to reach a nuclear deal with the genocidal Islamic Sharia tyranny of Iran that swears it will do anything to destroy Israel, as well as a deal with Iran's ally - the Communist dictator of Venezuela Maduro, and other scum of the earth.

They are hypocrites and liars. Their interest is to advance their globalist agenda.

A Ukrainian win in the war and a victory for the globalist establishment's confident belief that America should be the world's policeman who can easily wage economic warfare against "unpopular" countries and bend them to its will, might not be in Israel's best interests.

Let no one think that the massive economic war that the US government and its Western allies are waging against Russia cannot be done against Israel when the next war breaks out. If not by government decrees than by the multinational corporations wanting to virtue signal by "canceling" Israel. We have already seen ports in California and Italy refuse to deal with Israeli transport ships during the last war.

I wont mind if the globalists are humbled in Ukraine.

[Hrvatski Noahid]

When NATO bombed Serbia to save the Muslim terrorist Mujahideen from the Serbs, Israeli foreign minister Ariel Sharon condemned NATO.

NATO bombed Serbia because she was the aggressor throughout the Balkans. In no way did Croatia endanger Serbia's territorial integrity or Serbia's citizens. It was a one sided aggression against Croatia pure and simple.

Because Russia is far more dangerous, I understand NATO's reluctance to bomb her.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

The Mujahideen has nothing to do with the Balkans. It was in Afghanistan in the 1980's and involved the Reagan Administration, not in the 1990's involving the Clinton Administration.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

NATO bombed Serbia because she was the aggressor throughout the Balkans. In no way did Croatia endanger Serbia's territorial integrity or Serbia's citizens. It was a one sided aggression against Croatia pure and simple.

Because Russia is far more dangerous, I understand NATO's reluctance to bomb her.

NATO bombed Serbia because Serbia defended itself against the Albanian Muslim Nazis in Kosovo.

[Hrvatski Noahid]

NATO bombed Serbia because Serbia defended itself against the Albanian Muslim Nazis in Kosovo.

Right, and her previous aggression had nothing to do with NATO's decision. Give me a break.

[Ron]

The Mujahideen has nothing to do with the Balkans. It was in Afghanistan in the 1980's and involved the Reagan Administration, not in the 1990's involving the Clinton Administration.

The topic was America's interventionism. There were Mujahideen in the Balkans too, often the very same terrorists that America armed and trained in Afghanistan.