JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Dr. Dan on October 11, 2017, 11:16:00 AM

Title: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Dr. Dan on October 11, 2017, 11:16:00 AM
She said something in line with, "That women have it coming to them-by the way they dress".  Suddenly it was seen controversial as it gave an excuse for men to harass women not dressed modestly enough.

I have to say while there was truth in that statement, it was worded incorrectly.

No man has a right to do things to women that Harvey Weinstein did, even if she is walking around half naked.

BUT

Someone who dresses black at night walking in the street might have it coming to him to get hit by a car.  Best to behave a certain way (or dress a certain way) to avoid being a victim of something bad.

Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Zelhar on October 11, 2017, 12:25:56 PM
I think some people trade sex for job opportunity, usually it's the woman who provide the sexual currency and the man provides the dollars but it's not exclusively so, like for example it must also be a common trade between gays and lesbians etc.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Ulli on October 11, 2017, 11:35:59 PM
When you look for hypocrisy this case is the best example.

Read the quotes from the so called victims in this article.

Quote
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4972056/Weinstein-LA-middle-fingers-law-offices.html

Weinstein is here the victim.

Allegedly he raped his way for decades trough Hollywood. Everybody was terrified. And  lots of the accusing women could barly rescue their innocence from the sexmonster. Read the article it is unbelievable.  :::D

They have profited from him in many cases. Some go at night to him. Some go to hotelrooms. They meet with him when he is half naked.

In many cases they have not only asked for it. They have initiated it.

Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Zelhar on October 12, 2017, 02:39:58 PM
I don't think he is victim. It is possible that he has actually committed a real sexual assault or even rape. But he didn't victimize any of the high profile multi-millionaires such as Gwinth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie. They have always been highly compensated prostitutes. That's the business they are in and that's what they are.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Joe Gutfeld on October 12, 2017, 04:14:46 PM
What a phony loser!
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: AsheDina on October 15, 2017, 10:56:11 AM
Weinstein is a leftist pig and the b'tches he went after are leftists pigs.
I'm glad the leftists pigs are killing each other
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 15, 2017, 12:36:18 PM
They're trying to make people relate.

This situation has nothing to do with what any of you have ever lived through, don't get distracted. The Hollyweird pervert sex rings are being taken down, and helping somehow leaves open the possibility of having influence on culture now, which political power needs to run.

Not linking because of immodest images.

From Chicks on the Right

Pussycat Dolls Member Reveals The Girl Group Was “A Prostitution Ring”
Kimber
October 14, 2017 11:03pm

Kaya Jones was once in the popular “[censored] Cat Dolls” girl group.

While I’ve never been a fan myself, they were certainly really, really popular.

You might remember this obnoxious little number…

They all kinda sound like that. I don’t know if Kaya is in this song because they constantly swapped girls out and they all kind of look the same to me.

Anywhooooo…. One of them is saying they were all basically hookers.

    I hope all you Hollywood elites are a little nervous tonight.Who knows maybe tomorrow your family & friends will find out who you really are

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    Kaya I think it’s funny that Hollywood & Political Liberals condemned Weinstein who knows everything about them& can rat all them out! #Dirt

    — 2018MAGAMidTrmTrump (@2018MAGAMidTrmT) October 13, 2017

    Yup!&this sinking ship🚢is a titanic of power.So get ready for everything around it/ties to it goes down with it from the suction🌊🌪🌊Say bye👋🏼 https://t.co/uJycsaLlN3

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    Tried to silence us,made us stronger.Tried to drug us,but we were wide awake.Tried to blacklist us,but fans followed.We arent kids anymore

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    The children you messed with that survived the abuse, we are adults now.Are you ready old ones to fight?Cause you all are looking mighty old

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

And then she gets SERIOUS:

    My truth.I wasn’t in a girl group. I was in a prostitution ring.Oh & we happened to sing & be famous. While everyone who owned us made the $

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    How bad was it?people ask-bad enough that I walked away from my dreams,bandmates&a 13 million dollar record deal.We knew we were going to#1

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    I want the den mother from hell to confess why another 1 of her girl group girls committed suicide?Tell the public how you mentally broke us

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

 Twitter followers assumed this “den mother from hell” is founder and choreographer for the group, Robin Antin.

It’s also assumed Jones is talking about G.R.L. singer Simone Battle, who committed suicide in 2014. She has not confirmed this.

    To be apart of the team you must be a team player.Meaning sleep with whoever they say.If you dont they have nothing on you to leverage

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    Yes I said leverage. Meaning after they turn you out or get you hooked on drugs they use it against you.Correct.Victimizing the victim again

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

I’m going to be honest… this next tweet makes me uncomfortable:

    That’s why I have so much respect for our military. I’ve been through war. But my scars you can’t see. At least real war is honest

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

I don’t really think that’s a smart comparison to make….. but ok… I’m not going to chastise her too hard for this one because it’s not the point of what she’s talking about…

    Why don’t we report it? Because we are all abused! I personally have been warned if I tell I will … you know end up dead or no more career

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

    Anyone in Hollywood care to talk about the industry’s sins? Nope no one …. pic.twitter.com/PjgLkXdF8V

    — KAYA (@KayaJones) October 13, 2017

So….. yikes. That’s a lot to swallow.

Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 15, 2017, 12:39:03 PM
Weinstein is a leftist pig and the b'tches he went after are leftists pigs.
I'm glad the leftists pigs are killing each other

You seriously think that all these girls know enough to do more than repeat the line their producer got money to make them say?
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on October 15, 2017, 01:20:00 PM
I hope Kaya Jones helps tear down that whole sickening culture of abuse.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: syyuge on October 15, 2017, 03:39:56 PM
The man involved is certainly a rogue and degenerated but such cases are generally bogus.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 15, 2017, 07:19:26 PM
There are tapes where's he's screaming get in the room and she says no and he's like don't embarass me, and scaring her and making it look like she's the one messing with him while she's trying to flee, you're dealing with an ultra powerful politically protected untouchable liberal and girls that thought they would be stars people would love. Hollywood isn't a great place, but at least for a little bit care about the victims. We can deal with girls falls for leftist crap or not knowing that you don't trust every flashy guy with big promises later, it's important, but right right now the issue is those girls had to get raped to act. They gotta know that the people won't be swayed by their rapists against them, just because they have the media. We don't need to make this about any one of them, it's a corruption on the art in the first place, and it's part of what I've been saying, Hollywood makes politics and not movies, and since they're political whores they are not respected as artists and the political pimps don't mind using them as real whores too. Artists need to be protected from powerful rapists and political powers that want to use them for their personal needs, or as Daniel greenfield put it, the politicization of everything is the return to tribalism.

People are actually standing with these girls because we care about art and respect artists, but most will want to talk against them, because that's what politicians do and that's what you do with them. Their sexual abuse risks become politics and not just a crime, and they need to be stood up for by the people.

Just this time, even if they're not perfect, there are girls there that need help from really creepy disgusting liberal rapists, some really just want to be good actors for the art and to make people happy, please if you speak on this speak for them, they;'re the only party here that really needs your words and will benefit from them if they're good.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on October 16, 2017, 12:28:29 AM
The man involved is certainly a rogue and degenerated but such cases are generally bogus.

Not in Hollywood. The powerful prey on children.
And adult actors too.  Men are victimized by these pervs too.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on October 16, 2017, 12:30:38 AM
There are tapes where's he's screaming get in the room and she says no and he's like don't embarass me, and scaring her and making it look like she's the one messing with him while she's trying to flee, you're dealing with an ultra powerful politically protected untouchable liberal and girls that thought they would be stars people would love. Hollywood isn't a great place, but at least for a little bit care about the victims. We can deal with girls falls for leftist crap or not knowing that you don't trust every flashy guy with big promises later, it's important, but right right now the issue is those girls had to get raped to act. They gotta know that the people won't be swayed by their rapists against them, just because they have the media. We don't need to make this about any one of them, it's a corruption on the art in the first place, and it's part of what I've been saying, Hollywood makes politics and not movies, and since they're political whores they are not respected as artists and the political pimps don't mind using them as real whores too. Artists need to be protected from powerful rapists and political powers that want to use them for their personal needs, or as Daniel greenfield put it, the politicization of everything is the return to tribalism.

People are actually standing with these girls because we care about art and respect artists, but most will want to talk against them, because that's what politicians do and that's what you do with them. Their sexual abuse risks become politics and not just a crime, and they need to be stood up for by the people.

Just this time, even if they're not perfect, there are girls there that need help from really creepy disgusting liberal rapists, some really just want to be good actors for the art and to make people happy, please if you speak on this speak for them, they;'re the only party here that really needs your words and will benefit from them if they're good.

Of course!
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Secularbeliever on October 16, 2017, 12:56:59 AM
She said something in line with, "That women have it coming to them-by the way they dress".  Suddenly it was seen controversial as it gave an excuse for men to harass women not dressed modestly enough.

I have to say while there was truth in that statement, it was worded incorrectly.

No man has a right to do things to women that Harvey Weinstein did, even if she is walking around half naked.

BUT

I just got home from Las Vegas.  Never saw so many scantily clad women.  Either they were strippers whose shift had not started or women are different than what I grew up with

Someone who dresses black at night walking in the street might have it coming to him to get hit by a car.  Best to behave a certain way (or dress a certain way) to avoid being a victim of something bad.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: AsheDina on October 17, 2017, 10:04:13 AM
Angelina Jolie... Such a pathetic human

(https://passtheknowledge.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/10458749_608064749306715_3465143001550226350_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 17, 2017, 01:49:02 PM
(https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/22490034_10208511224693108_3215902609054656548_n.jpg?oh=ad0fafe1f9c4fb33942b96fab8329c1a&oe=5A3C988D)

I think this post is not fair. From painful personal experience, the worst thing about being a cult where all the girls are getting raped and you're getting beat and brainwashed with nonsense is that even if you hate them you're still loyal because that's your group and you don't see how you'd survive without it, and you promote what they say even if you don't believe it because it becomes your identity. I was able to get out, these guys run a lot of America, it's so much harder, and the girls are scared they won't get the help they need, and even if they can in a second, they see people saying things against them when the media cues up a bad story, and they don't think they can win, so they try to advance in the ranks while wishing they could leave all together.

I sometimes get really down from tough things and then do bad things too. I know the bad things are completely my fault, but with a little help, it is so much easier to do the right thing, so judging is hard.

There could be an order of bodyguards dedicated to protecting artists, which would keep the slimy hands of politicians, corporations and rapists off of them so they can make beautiful art. It wouldn't be hard to get funding, and as long as it can be ensured completely that its men can adhere to an oath of secrecy (paparazzi) along with the oaths of a bodyguard, whoever starts that could influence America for good or bad if he is good or bad, G-d willing if such a thing happens he is good.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Dr. Dan on October 17, 2017, 02:04:06 PM
The saddest part is that some women need to sell "sex" to get noticed and to even be promoted..it's part of everyday life in this part of the world and it's immoral in my opinion.

It's one of the things that will make this country crash to the ground, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on October 17, 2017, 06:36:11 PM
Yea I really don't see the point of that photo or why the creator thinks they have a point.  They don't understand abuse
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 18, 2017, 01:14:37 PM
The saddest part is that some women need to sell "sex" to get noticed and to even be promoted..it's part of everyday life in this part of the world and it's immoral in my opinion.

It's one of the things that will make this country crash to the ground, in my opinion.

There's always someone that will sleep around to get ahead at any company or organization, with guys too. This isn't the same. You had very beautiful very talented girls that realized they could say yes to the old bastard or get the hell out of anywhere the American press reaches.

I see what you're saying on a macro level, and I propose that urban living as is has an effect. If you live in a village of 3000, you know 3000 people, in a city, you live with 10 million strangers, many people are lonely and jealous of stars that get lots of attention, and have to find ways to get more and more of it for themselves. There are likely other reasons, the breakdown of morality is required for that to matter in the first place, but I think lack of socialization in urban settings contributes to that and that increasing socialization in cities would make people stronger and politicians more beholden to them, and would reduce this and other harmful tactics used by the attention-starved.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 22, 2017, 02:24:37 AM
Seen on FB

The long awaited release of the documentary film “An Open Secret” has arrived, this despite the fact that multiple high-level Hollywood power players tried to kill the film.

“An Open Secret” takes an in-depth looks at the stories of five former child actors who were sexually assaulted by multiple predators in Hollywood, including convicted sex offender, Mark Collins-Rector who “co-owned and operated the now infamous Digital Entertainment Network.”

The film itself cost over a million dollars to make but, in light of the recent Harvey Weinstein scandal, the filmmakers have decided to release the film for free for a limited time.

In light of the long awaited revelations of sexual abuse in Hollywood finally being reported ESPONDA PRODUCTIONS presents AN OPEN SECRET for free for a limited time . A film about the sexual abuse of children in the entertainment industry in Hollywood.

One of the films producers, Gabe Hoffman, recently appeared on the Alex Jones Show for a discussion about the documentary and during the interview he revealed that members of the “Hollywood Elite” had actively attempted to ban and hurt the film. That’s right, amid the Harvey Weinstein scandal, we now have a direct allegation of high-level Hollywood power players engaging in conduct specifically meant to hurt and or censor a film that exposes pedophiles.

Let that sink in for a moment.

“Imagine you make a film, you hire an Oscar nominated director and all that. Then you take it to the mainstream, liberal leaning media for the reviews…. your film gets a 93% positive rating on Rotten Tomatoes, that is almost unprecedented,” Hoffman told Jones.

“So we are thinking ok, we will go to film festivals because hey that is the next step in the process to try and sell something. Film festivals are easy to get into, especially when you have something as legitimate as this. It is a no brainer.”

Hoffman then revealed that after getting approval from middle tier executives at three different film festivals, each invite was subsequently killed by higher level officials.

“The first three film festivals that we tried to go too, LA, Toronto, and London. You know what happened? The lower level people who revie the film for quality thought ok great we are going to put it up there, in fact in a place of prominence,” Hoffman explained in detail.

“Then, each time, a couple of weeks later, guess what happened? The higher ups learned about it, through their Hollywood connected pedophiles, and they disinvited us from those festivals.”

All in all the film is a must watch (although very difficult to get through at times) and is set to play a major part in what many believe will be the next wave of scandals to hit Hollywood.

For really the first time ever, it is a very real possibility that the entire Hollywood elite pedophile network is about to crumble.

Watch the whole video and see Hollywood the WHORE HOUSE, and yet they have balls to calls us conservatives, EVERY DIRTY NAME IN THE BOOK ! WOW, JUST WOW !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfWFjWnuCQE
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Zelhar on October 22, 2017, 03:56:07 AM
It turns out that the Weinstein Company was going broke even without the scandal. Is it a coincidence that as soon as their influence died down the sh*t hit the fan?
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 22, 2017, 03:58:25 AM
It turns out that the Weinstein Company was going broke even without the scandal. Is it a coincidence that as soon as their influence died down the sh*t hit the fan?

Being the fall guy here might save Miramax. From the way the media is talking, you'd think sex abuse in Hollywood is over for good now.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: syyuge on October 22, 2017, 01:57:24 PM
Angelina Jolie... Such a pathetic human

(https://passtheknowledge.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/10458749_608064749306715_3465143001550226350_n.jpg)

Henceforth I withdraw my longstanding support for Angelina Jolie.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: syyuge on October 22, 2017, 02:05:06 PM
Not in Hollywood. The powerful prey on children.
And adult actors too.  Men are victimized by these pervs too.

You are most likely to be correct. Powerful liberals may be like that only.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 23, 2017, 06:33:40 PM
Henceforth I withdraw my longstanding support for Angelina Jolie.

It's a fake quote. She's an anti-Israel liberal that shouldn't be supported for any reason I know, but it's still a lie, and that picture was originally circulated on a muslim website with other fake quotes from celebrities, some comment I found on the meme said.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 24, 2017, 05:13:00 AM
Just in case there was confusion, let me try to spell out the facts. Boys and girls that go to hollywood with dreams of being stars get raped by disgusting liberals (if you can call smoking crack with the kid and then blackmailing him and saying he or she will get replaced in the movie and fined massive amounts for breach of contract, and other unimaginably malicious situations an exception to calling it rape, then there are exceptions).

When the actors come to talk about being raped by disgusting liberals, other disgusting liberals they thought would help fight them.

There is no one to protect the artists when they go in and no one to help them if they want to get out, and they can outright say it on live t.v. and there'll be enough disinformation to keep it from mattering.

https://www.facebook.com/Brutlive/videos/1808655682766276/

Art shapes and is an expression of culture and ultimately national pride. You can shape culture and be an object of pride if you help protect these artists by finding them when they want to enter the acting world, and giving them a place that will support and protect them and give them a platform to say what they want.

Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 29, 2017, 06:44:41 PM
http://sultanknish.blogspot.ca/2017/10/harvey-weinsteins-victims-were.html

Wednesday, October 18, 2017
Harvey Weinstein's Victims Were Collateral Damage in the Left's Culture War
Posted by Daniel Greenfield 20 Comments
In the spring of his final year as a movie mogul, Harvey Weinstein was doing what he always did. Or rather what he always did in public view: as opposed to what he has been accused of doing in hotel rooms and deserted office storage rooms. He was fighting a ratings war over a movie with adult content.

The movie was 3 Generations. It had been made two years earlier to cash in on the transgender
boom.  Back then it was called About Ray. But the reviews were bad and the movie was pulled a few days before it was supposed to be released. What do you do with a bad politically correct movie that you paid $6 million for? You start a culture war. And that’s exactly what Harvey Weinstein did.

He enlisted GLAAD, the gay rights group, to lobby for a PG-13 rating for the newly renamed movie.

"The Weinstein Company dared to tell culture-changing LGBTQ stories that Hollywood too often shies away from,” GLAAD president Sarah Kate Ellis shilled.

It didn’t hurt that Harvey was a donor to GLAAD and the Human Rights Campaign. Weinstein had even presented his pal, Bill Clinton, with a GLAAD award at its awards show.

Harvey’s gambit didn’t pay off financially. The reviews for 3 Generations were just as bad this time around. And it took in $60,000. Or 1 percent of what Harvey had paid for it. But Harvey had known two years ago that the movie wouldn’t make money. The 3 Generations campaign wasn’t about the movie, but about Harvey Weinstein’s brand as a courageous mogul on the political cutting edge of the industry.

Harvey Weinstein wasn’t really in the movie business. He was in the culture business.

Some of his movies were meant for general audiences. But mostly he sold the illusion of culture to a prosperous leftist elite. Sometimes that meant traditional highbrow British Oscar bait like The King’s Speech or Shakespeare in Love. But much of the time it meant pandering to their politics.

And thus, 3 Generations, for the transgender category, The Hunting Ground, for the campus rape category, Fruitvale Station, for police brutality, Wind River, for Native American oppression, and, if you reach back far enough, Fahrenheit 9/11 for the anti-war category and Miral, for the anti-Israel category.

And countless others.

Harvey Weinstein didn’t get all his Oscars and his clout in the industry because he had good taste. Or even a good idea of what would work. The 3 Generations debacle is a reminder of that. The New York Times pulled the trigger on the story that brought him down, after blocking a similar story in his heyday, because his company was faltering and no longer all that valuable to the finances of the big lefty paper.

Even at his peak, he was never all that big when compared to the big boys of the industry. His estimated net worth is under $300 million. What made him think he could grab Gwyneth Paltrow, the goddaughter of Steven Spielberg, an industry titan with a net worth of $3 billion, and get away with it?

All that clout which brought in Oscars, fawning media profiles and the frightened compliance of the women he abused, didn’t come from his cash, it came from his role as a culture warrior of the left.

When Harvey Weinstein wanted to bully the MPAA and promote a bad movie, he had the heads of the biggest gay rights groups at his beck and call. When he wanted to push Miral, an anti-Israel movie that was just as bad, he got it screened at the UN General Assembly Hall. When he wanted to promote, The Hunting Ground, a discredited documentary, Planned Parenthood was eager to step up.

Why was everyone from the United Nations to GLAAD so eager to accommodate Harvey?

Money was an obvious factor. Harvey donated enthusiastically to left-wing groups like Planned Parenthood and GLAAD. Just this year, he helped endow a chair in Gloria Steinem’s name.

But money wasn’t enough. Hollywood’s bigwigs routinely write big checks for trendy causes.

Harvey Weinstein got his clout as a culture warrior. An alphabet soup of lefty groups, right up to the UN, was eager to give him what he wanted because they saw him as championing their agenda.

He rolled out movies that pushed the left’s social and political agendas like no other company did. And in return, he got the same “rape pass” that Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton and other top lefties did.

It wasn’t mere money that intimidated his victims. Harvey’s millions alone didn’t buy him the right to assault and then silence women, some of whom became famous and powerful in their own right, in an industry that is the subject of constant media attention and scrutiny. It was his connections on the left.

Harvey Weinstein shoveled large amounts of money into the media and lefty groups. But more than mere cash, he had their loyalty because he fought the cultural battles that they wanted him to fight.

And they provided him with exactly the stories he wanted. And none of the stories he didn’t want.

The media is hunting through Hollywood to find out who knew about Harvey. And everyone knew and said nothing. They said nothing because the media would have destroyed them. Look back at the old stories about Harvey’s conflicts with the MPAA, with Jewish groups over Miral, and so many others, and it’s easy to spot the heavy hand of Harvey in every article. The media let him write the story.

It let him write the story because he was telling their stories in theaters across the country.

What no one in Hollywood or the media can say is that the women whom he abused were collateral damage in a culture war. Harvey ran an assembly line on which movies about the left’s latest social agenda were rolled out. If you wanted campus rapes, police brutality, transgender, gay rights, anti-Israel or anything from the Left “R” Us emporium, he made it happen. And the price was ignoring the screams coming from his hotel rooms and the office storage rooms that he allegedly brought women to.

The left paid that price. It paid it, until Harvey wasn’t good for it anymore. And then it came to collect.

Harvey Weinstein didn’t assault women ‘despite’ his leftist politics as the media alleges in its fumbling efforts to connect him to toxic masculinity. He assaulted women because of his leftist politics. It was his politics that made him feel safe assaulting women. And it was his politics that made them feel unsafe about turning him in. How do you take on a man who has Planned Parenthood in his back pocket?

And it was his cultural transgressiveness that won him a pass. The cultural pioneers of the left who break all sorts of sexual boundaries are expected to occasionally transgress boundaries like consent. That’s true across the entertainment industry. And it was true across the counterculture in general.

How many rapes were there at Occupy Wall Street camps and how much sexual harassment was there in the Bernie Sanders campaign? That’s how leftist political and culture wars have always worked.

Harvey Weinstein’s willingness to push cultural boundaries insulated him from accusations of abuse by, on the one hand, making him appear too virtuously leftist to do such a thing, and on the other hand, giving him a pass for being too transgressive to be bound by the conventions of bourgeois morality.

And Harvey’s shabby defenses have called on both arguments, trying to wrap himself in the cause of gun control, signaling his usefulness to the left, and invoking the culture of the 70s, to create complicity.

Harvey is still hoping that the left’s culture war can be invoked to protect its fallen monster.

Following its “Tragedy + Trump = Story” formula, the media has run numerous stories trying to tie Harvey to Trump. It’s revealing, not only for the partisan cynicism of trying to associate the actions of a top Obama and Hillary donor with Trump, but because it shows why the media covered for Harvey.

Even now, it’s still incapable of acknowledging that a leftist can sexually abuse and rape. Its political tribalism is so strong that it needs to associate Harvey with Trump to be able to condemn him.

And that, more than anything else, shows why the media covered for Harvey Weinstein.

The women whom Harvey allegedly abused knew that the media’s rule is that there are no enemies to the left. And Harvey had worked hard to always stay to the left of everyone else. Including his victims.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on October 31, 2017, 01:36:19 PM
#MeToo is trying to turn the concept of rape into politics, like art and music and videos and half of everything else has been already, but there are some positive developments for the moment.

If they want to identity politics rape, then maybe it can be used to bring an eye against Islam also, not that I don't love to see creepy liberals go down.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/268279/muslim-brotherhood-prof-hillary-let-us-raped-and-daniel-greenfield#.WfijWNB4wZU.facebook

Muslim Brotherhood Prof Hillary Let Into US, Raped and Choked Woman
October 31, 2017
Daniel Greenfield
(http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2017/10/tariqramadan2.jpg?itok=zzVem0-D)
The #MeToo campaign just went somewhere really unexpected and interesting.

Tariq Ramadan is the left's favorite Islamist. He's been the face of a fake "moderate Islam". Where the Bush administration banned Ramadan, Obama let him in. When Bush banned Ramadan, the media quickly came to his defense. He got an op-ed in the Washington Post. When Obama let him in, the New Yorker cheered, "Tariq Ramadan Comes to America!"

And who gets the credit for letting him in? Hillary Clinton.

     Hillary Clinton, has signed an order effectively lifting the Bush-era ban for Ramadan, a visiting fellow at St Antony's College Oxford.

    "Both the president and the secretary of state have made it clear that the US government is pursuing a new relationship with Muslim communities based on mutual interest and mutual respect," said state department spokesman Darby Holladay in a statement. "We'll let that action speak for itself."

    Jameel Jafaar, Ramadan's American Civil Liberties Union lawyer said that the state department recognised the original exclusion was based on "political views." "We see secretary Clinton's decision as a recognition that the (exclusion was) illegitimate to begin with."

    Since 2006, the American Civil Liberties Union has been fighting a lawsuit against the state department and the department of homeland security to challenge the visa ban on the Swiss-born Ramadan.

Now Ramadan stands accused of rape. The case is in France, but letting him into America wasn't just bad for national security, it endangered women.

    A Muslim feminist activist in France who has accused prominent Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan of violent rape detailed her claims in a hard-hitting interview Monday.

    The leading Oxford professor, whose grandfather founded Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood Islamist movement, is facing investigations in France for the alleged rape of two women.

    Henda Ayari, a former Muslim fundamentalist who says Ramadan raped her in a Paris hotel room in 2012, said she was encouraged to speak out against him publicly by the "Me Too" campaign sweeping the world.

    Ayari, who lodged a rape complaint against the 55-year-old Swiss national on October 20, charged that for Tariq Ramadan, "either you wear a veil or you get raped".

    "He choked me so hard that I thought I was going to die," she added.

    A second unnamed woman on Friday also accused Ramadan of raping her in a hotel room in 2009.

    Ramadan, a professor of contemporary Islamic studies at Oxford University, is popular among conservative Muslims. Secular critics accuse him of promoting a political form of Islam.

Not just secular critics. But you can see why Ramadan likes Sharia law.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on November 05, 2017, 07:53:29 PM
Tis the season to oust rapists http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/268325/every-major-lefty-mag-engulfed-sexual-harassment-daniel-greenfield#.Wf9hBfiT9B4.facebook
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Ulli on December 25, 2017, 01:26:42 AM
Tis the season to oust rapists http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/268325/every-major-lefty-mag-engulfed-sexual-harassment-daniel-greenfield#.Wf9hBfiT9B4.facebook

This men inclusive Weinstein have dedicated their whole life to the cause of Bolschewism. Now from one day to the other they are finished. And when they lie at the floor they get kicked from everybody. None of the fellow leftists remembers their "merits". None of them has doubts. Soon they will photoshop all the pictures in the Internet and delete them from it. This is like in Russia under Stalin.

I  think that this treatment is shabby.

Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on December 25, 2017, 03:17:38 AM
This men inclusive Weinstein have dedicated their whole life to the cause of Bolschewism. Now from one day to the other they are finished. And when they lie at the floor they get kicked from everybody. None of the fellow leftists remembers their "merits". None of them has doubts. Soon they will photoshop all the pictures in the Internet and delete them from it. This is like in Russia under Stalin.

I  think that this treatment is shabby.

The support group for victims of leftist cannibalism would be packed, but not like the support group for their victims.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Ulli on December 25, 2017, 02:35:16 PM
The support group for victims of leftist cannibalism would be packed, but not like the support group for their victims.
I think victim is used inflationary. There are only accusations without proof. And they come from people with doubtfull background that even profited from their offenders.

 Have you noticed the names Weinstein,Wieseltier, Corn and Fish. I feel uncomfortable with it. It let me remember the Stalin time with the doctor trials. It runs according to the pattern Accusation Pressure Apologies in public and then (social) annihilation.

I feel there is something wrong.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on January 09, 2018, 01:37:36 PM
The #MeToo movement I had a lot of hope for didn't have one right winger taking advantage of it, now that ship has sailed, and it has become an utter monstrosity.

(https://scontent-yyz1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26238982_2098664823482161_643957368768478778_n.jpg?oh=857426d70029460142d9664894c1c39b&oe=5AECEAD6)
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Ulli on August 21, 2018, 03:02:52 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennett.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennett.html)

This is unbelievable. This Asia Argento did at the same time provenly what she accuses Weinstein of.  I am very curious how the process in New York will end. Perhaps we will be surprised.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on August 30, 2018, 01:05:48 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennett.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/asia-argento-assault-jimmy-bennett.html)

This is unbelievable. This Asia Argento did at the same time provenly what she accuses Weinstein of.  I am very curious how the process in New York will end. Perhaps we will be surprised.

Is this a joke? He banged a hot girl. They took selfies and he said he missed her months later. "The fallout from “a sexual battery” was so traumatic that it hindered Mr. Bennett’s work and income and threatened his mental health, according to a notice of intent to sue that his lawyer sent in November to Richard Hofstetter, Mr. Bourdain’s longtime lawyer, who was also representing Ms. Argento at the time."

You gotta be kidding.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on August 30, 2018, 01:07:43 AM
All those poor 17 year old boys having sex with hot rich women we've gotta do something. Maybe make a video on how they are traumatized. Like I had sex at 9, he's prob pissed because she just hit and ran.
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Joe Gutfeld on August 31, 2018, 03:30:30 PM
Harvey Weinstein is nothing more than a sex maniac who used his position to rape as many women as possible. 
Title: Re: Dona Karin's comment regarding Harvey Weinstein
Post by: Israel Chai on September 03, 2018, 11:11:14 AM
Harvey Weinstein is nothing more than a sex maniac who used his position to rape as many women as possible.

He's also a rabid Israel hater who promotes all the evil of the left and many other bad things.