JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Zelhar on November 13, 2017, 02:38:58 PM
-
I think the reports are reasonably well founded. He was hitting on teenaged girls. He should step down. I wouldn't be surprised if more serious allegations pop up down the road.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiLFiH1ARvo
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/woman-says-roy-moore-initiated-sexual-encounter-when-she-was-14-he-was-32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html
-
I heard that someone new came forward in accusing Roy Moore being interested in underage girls.
-
Zelhar, it's "hitting" not "heating", see why you might think that but that's incorrect English.
I don't know, but I read an article on Red State about David Horowitz's reaction, which was he thinks he rapes little girls but better than democrats. I agree with the conclusions that the arguments used to support Trump will create more and more immorality on the right and acceptance of it.
-
It seems a little fishy: https://jtf.org/bombshell-judge-roy-moore-accuser-worked-for-hillary-clinton-joe-biden-campaigns-part-of-the-resistance/
We're gung-ho about taking down the rapists after the wave of leftists being caught, but we can't forget that many men are falsely accused, and it ruins their lives. If the evidence was fished out of WAPO's cesspool of written diarrhea, I say stand behind Roy until the evidence is there.
It feels like our hatred for rapists is being used to murder innocent people now, and I'm mad as heck that the leftists that be see me as a tool.
-
He's not Jewish and the women in question were over the age of 12 when it happened. Unless he forced himself on them, there's no problem. Under Halacha there is no problem (since it didn't violate the Noahide Laws) and under civil law, the statue of limitations is over. What are they going to do, retroactively invalidate that he was a judge? At the same time, the government tolerates more serious sexual misconduct (homosexuality) and forces the recognition of Sodomite "marriages".
-
He's not Jewish and the women in question were over the age of 12 when it happened. Unless he forced himself on them, there's no problem. Under Halacha there is no problem (since it didn't violate the Noahide Laws) and under civil law, the statue of limitations is over. What are they going to do, retroactively invalidate that he was a judge? At the same time, the government tolerates more serious sexual misconduct (homosexuality) and forces the recognition of Sodomite "marriages".
You can't judge him by Jewish law if he's not a Jew, and molesting people is a major crime for Jews, btw.
He's got the 7 of Noah, one is to have a court of laws, which includes following them. If the law says he can't touch he can't, his law, his nation's destiny, he should follow it. This is not to say I know the truth about him or his accusers or alleged victims at all.
-
Here's an example of attention whores using #MeToo to get attention, which hurts the chances of real victims, and creates male ones, who become extremely likely to never believe a sexual harassment claim. In this case, its a teeny.
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/women-accuse-sports-blogger-sex-harassment-turns-out-he-was-teen-girl
Major players across film, television, and journalism are being cast away after an influx of sexual abuse allegations and admissions are rocking the powerful. Women and men on the receiving end of these unwanted sexual advances have finally been emboldened by the sheer number of accusers willing to step forward. However, the #MeToo movement isn't without it's hiccups, as evidenced by this story about sports writer Ryan Schultz.
For the last eight years, Schultz has been writing about baseball for various sports sites. He has been known to be married with two children. But recently, he, too, has been rocked with allegations of sexual harassment by several women who claim they were harassed online. But there’s just one problem: Schultz is really a girl writing under a pseudonym.
The San Francisco Gate explains:
[Schultz is] a young Missouri woman who had written under the false identity since she was 13.
A Deadspin report revealed the identity of Ryan Schultz to be 21-year-old Becca Schultz, who took on the identity to freely write for sites like SB Nation and Baseball Prospectus. As the years went by, Becca couldn't figure out how to disentangle herself from the fabricated persona.
This weekend, Schultz tweeted “a misogynistic joke that ruffled some online feathers,” Deadspin added. Her Twitter account has since been deleted. That's when everything started to unravel.
Apparently, at least two of these “victims” sent Schultz nude photos of themselves and regularly chatted with “him” online about baseball and hockey. They said Schultz would often be “drunk” and “berate them” and then “imply that he’d hurt himself” if they stopped communicating.
Schultz believed this "stereotypical guy" persona was the only way to be female and write in a male-dominated field.
"I was young and had no idea what to do," Schultz said. “So I just acted like I thought a man would."
It’s a complicated world out there.
-
corrected.
Zelhar, it's "hitting" not "heating", see why you might think that but that's incorrect English.
I don't know, but I read an article on Red State about David Horowitz's reaction, which was he thinks he rapes little girls but better than democrats. I agree with the conclusions that the arguments used to support Trump will create more and more immorality on the right and acceptance of it.
-
He agrees himself that dating 14 year olds should disqualify anyone as a politician. You can't invoke some primitive backward religious rule as an excuse. It's not the law of the land. 14 is below the age of consent.
He's not Jewish and the women in question were over the age of 12 when it happened. Unless he forced himself on them, there's no problem. Under Halacha there is no problem (since it didn't violate the Noahide Laws) and under civil law, the statue of limitations is over. What are they going to do, retroactively invalidate that he was a judge? At the same time, the government tolerates more serious sexual misconduct (homosexuality) and forces the recognition of Sodomite "marriages".
-
You can't judge him by Jewish law if he's not a Jew, and molesting people is a major crime for Jews, btw.
I didn't judge him by Jewish Law. I judged him by Noahide Law. Jews are forbidden from pre-marital sexual relations. Goyim are not. Jews aren't even supposed to kiss before marriage. I don't think he had sexual relations with them. If it was consensual, then there's no problem at all. I don't care if they were minors under civil law.
-
He agrees himself that dating 14 year olds should disqualify anyone as a politician. You can't invoke some primitive backward religious rule as an excuse. It's not the law of the land. 14 is below the age of consent.
Itès not primitizve and backward. Marrying your daughter to an old dude is considered as selling her as a slave, so it wasn't like that, the men got married at 12 too and they worked and supported themselves and their families, we didn't worry so much that they couldn't eat candy and play in the park all day, and the society was much more mature.
In a society with such disgusting people like we find all over now, obviously allowing it would lead to horrible abuses, and so no Rabbi would say to bring it back.
-
I didn't judge him by Jewish Law. I judged him by Noahide Law. Jews are forbidden from pre-marital sexual relations. Goyim are not. Jews aren't even supposed to kiss before marriage. I don't think he had sexual relations with them. If it was consensual, then there's no problem at all. I don't care if they were minors under civil law.
You're right about the first part, but part of the laws of Noah are to make a court of law and abide by it, so whatever is found in the "do not" section of the American civil code, so long as it doesn't violate the others, are part of their law. Also, a marriage at the most basic level for them is two consenting adults decide to go home after the bar, if one isn't consenting, then it's a violation.
-
The more I research, the more this seems like an assassination based on complete lies: https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/930254839568769024/photo/1
-
(https://scontent.fymy1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/s526x395/23559788_10155059574466444_7682082704301142214_n.jpg?oh=991166e23e35ac4243e1a45a4ead54aa&oe=5A91B962)
-
My Last Word on Roy Moore
Posted at 10:15 am on November 10, 2017 by streiff
I don’t live in Alabama but if I did, based on what I know right now, I’d happily vote for Roy Moore for Senate next month.
Yesterday, the Washington Post broke a story in which it alleges that in 1979 Roy Moore inappropriately touched a 14-year-old girl and kissed one or more women who were aged 16-18. Everyone, particularly Mitch McConnell and his allies who are still butt-hurt over Moore wiping the floor with them in the GOP primary and that growing caucus in the GOP that seems intent upon breaking its own ribs patting itself on the back over its righteousness are demanding Roy Moore “step aside.”
What his accusers are doing is parroting the star chamber procedures used on today’s college campuses in similar cases–a situation I’d mistakenly believed conservatives opposed. Once the accusation is made, guilt is decided. There is no need for inquiry or evidence. Just the accusation and a wild chant “believe women.” Hell, there are people out there who still believe Anita Hill so this is not surprising. It is more than a little surprising to find conservatives trying to lead the lynch mob.
There is really no reason that we are obliged to believe this story. Indeed, there are lots of reasons why we should look askance at it. It dates from 1979. Roy Moore has been on the ballot in Alabama several times and involved in all manner of controversies and the fact that it hasn’t come out before now leads me to say that a person’s word today is simply not good enough.
Anyone who tries to tie this to Bill Clinton is simply being disingenuous. None of Clinton’s accusers waited 40 years. None of the cases against Clinton were ambiguous. We actually had the DNA sample for crying out loud. Clinton actually paid a cash settlement to Paula Jones and was disbarred. If there is a takeaway from Bill Clinton’s escapades here it is that it is that we were told, mainly by the same people on their high horse over Roy Moore, that it is morally illegitimate to criticize a politician over his private morality.
The analogies to Harvey Weinstein are also nonsense. You can actually think it is wrong to rape someone (like Rose McGowan) and at the same time be skeptical about a 40-year-old claim about something that is definitely not rape. I know there are all kinds of reasons that someone might wait this long to make their claim, not all of those reasons have to do with fear or embarrassment.
If you want to condemn Moore based on this, well that’s your right. I’m not going to argue this with anyone because if you’ve already decided Moore is guilty then we have nothing to talk about. If you want to say I’m a bad person, knock yourself out I really don’t care. The adulation of people I don’t know is not one of my motivators.
But if you are saying Moore is guilty then don’t do it with blinders on and think this is not the way elections are not going to be run in the future. There is no politician that is not vulnerable to this kind of an attack where the only proof that is needed is the accusation itself.
So this is my last word on Roy Moore. I’ll be happy to revisit my opinion if actual evidence emerges and/or if we see, a la Harvey Weinstein, a battalion of 14-year-old victims coming forward to show this was a pattern Moore established over a period of years. But until such time I’m done with listening to the attacks on Moore or taking seriously most of the people making them.
And against:
Leigh Corfman: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Search Heavy
Leigh Corfman: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
44.7K Views 113 Comments
By Paul Farrell
Updated Nov 10, 2017 at 1:08pm
Published Nov 9, 2017 at 1:57pm
Leigh Corfman Facebook page Facebook/Cycle World of Gadsden
Leigh Corfman pictured in July 2015.
An Alabama woman has come forward and accused Republican senatorial candidate Roy Moore of initiating a sexual encounter between the two when she was 14. Leigh Corfman, 53, told her horrific story to the Washington Post in a bombshell report that was published on November 9.
Moore won the nomination to be the Republican senatorial candidate in September 2017 after defeating the Trump-backed Luther Strange in the GOP primary. Moore will face off against Democrat Doug Jones in the special election to replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions on December 12. Moore is a former chief justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court.
Here’s what you need to know:
1. Corfman Says She Was Approached by Moore While Her Parents Were Embroiled in a Custody Dispute
roy moore
Getty
Corfman told the Washington Post that Roy Moore approached her when she was 14 years old outside of a courtroom in Etowah County, Alabama. At the time, Moore was a 32-year-old assistant district attorney. After speaking with Corfman and her mother, Nancy Wells, Moore allegedly offered to watch the teen while Wells went into the courtroom for a child custody hearing. Online records show that Corfman’s father, Robert Corfman, died in January 2016.
During that time, Corfman says that she gave her phone number to Moore. A few days later, Moore picked her up from her home in Gadsden, Alabama. The two went to his home, a 30 minute drive from Corfman’s house. The two kissed. On a second date, Corfman says that Moore touched her over her bra and underwear. She adds that Moore took Corfman’s hand and put it over his underwear. Corfman said, “I wasn’t ready for that – I had never put my hand on a man’s penis, much less an erect one.” During one encounter, Corfman said that Moore was wearing nothing but “tight white” underpants. In that same encounter, Corfman accuses Moore of giving her alcohol. The legal drinking age in Alabama at the time was 19.
Leigh Corfman Roy Moore
Getty
Corfman told the Post, “I wanted it over with – I wanted out. Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over.” After telling him she was uncomfortable, Moore took her home.
Corfman called Moore “charming and smiley” and that she was “kind of giddy, excited, you know? An older guy, you know?”
The Post goes on to say that reporters interviewed three other women who were between 16 and 18 when they say Moore pursued them for intimate relationships. Corfman is the only one who said she had “sexual contact” with Moore.
2. Corfman Says She Is a Republican Who Voted for Trump
Donald Trump Live Stream, Donald Trump UN, Donald Trump UN Speech
GettyPresident Donald Trump on Monday during a dinner with Latin American leaders at the Palace Hotel.
In a statement to the Post, Moore said, “These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign.” Moore also called the story “the very definition fake news.”
Corfman told the Post that she has voted Republican in the last three presidential elections, including voting for Donald Trump in 2016. Heavy.com found a Facebook comment from Corfman where she spoke about buying a Stonewall Jackson antique. Jackson was arguably the best known confederate commander after Robert E. Lee.
3. Corfman Didn’t Come Forward Previously Because She Was Worried About Her Own Credibility
Corfman has a son and a daughter with country musician Dave Polston. Polston plays the five string banjo in they style of Earl Scruggs for the band 2 Lazy 2 Ranch band. Polston is also a banjo, dobro and guitar teacher.
She told the Post that the reason she didn’t come forward in 2000 when Moore was campaigning for the state Supreme Court was because her children were still in school. Corfman added that she was worried about her own credibility due to financial problems and three divorces. She says of this, “There is no one here that doesn’t know that I’m no angel.”
Corfman lived for a time in Arizona, where her children’s father is based. While there, a screen-printing business she had with her husband ended up leaving her heavily in-debt. The Post says in 1991 that she was in debt $139,689 in unpaid claims.
According to Corfman’s now-deleted LinkedIn page, she works a payday loan company. Previously, Corfman worked as a finance manager at a motorcycle dealership.
Corfman says, “I have prayed over this. All I know is that I can’t sit back and let this continue, let him continue without the mask being removed.”
4. Corfman Was in the News in 2013 When Her Son’s Prom Night Was ‘Ruined’ by Local Police
Leigh Corfman family
Screengrab via WBRC
Corfman made the news in 2013 when a prom her son was attending for Southside High School was raided by local police, reports WBRC. Corfman’s son told the station that the music was turned-off halfway through, the lights came on, and police began doing a table-to-table search without telling anyone what they were looking for. Corfman’s son said, “They just pretty much ruined the good time we were supposed to have.”
While Leigh Corfman told WBRC, that event was a “total nightmare” and that she was “horrified” by the police saying, “What about their rights?”
5. Moore Has a ‘Double Digit’ Lead Over His Democratic Challenger Doug Jones
According to Alabama.com, Moore is leading his Democrat challenger Doug Jones 51 percent to 40 percent. A spokesman for the polling company, Jonathan Gray of Strategy Research told the website, “People are not paying attention [to the race] right now. I just think it’s going to be late in the cycle when it gets tighter.”
Prior to the publication of the Post report, WHNT reported that Moore was refusing to debate Doug Jones.
Read More From Heavy
Rene Boucher: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Read More
5 Fast Facts, Breaking News, Politics
113 Comments
Leave a Reply
113 Comments
Anonymous November 13th, 2017
Not a Republican and I don’t believe it. Also, she gave Moore her phone number? Two dates and her parents did nothing ?
See More Comments
Discuss on Facebook
close sidebar
Home
Expand the sub menu
News
Expand the sub menu
Sports
Expand the sub menu
Entertainment
Expand the sub menu
Tech
Expand the sub menu
Gaming
Expand the sub menu
Shopping
Expand the sub menu
About Heavy
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Copyright © 2017 Heavy, Inc. All rights reserved. Powered by WordPress.com VIP
-
I didn't judge him by Jewish Law. I judged him by Noahide Law. Jews are forbidden from pre-marital sexual relations. Goyim are not. Jews aren't even supposed to kiss before marriage. I don't think he had sexual relations with them. If it was consensual, then there's no problem at all. I don't care if they were minors under civil law.
Pedo alert!
By definition it is not consensual when it is a child. They are not capable of consent.
I bet you would argue that children should not be allowed to "consent" to a sex change operation decided on by their parents for the same reason. Same logic applies here.
Claiming it was "consensual" is what every perverted sicko child rapist does.
-
There is no need to lie where there is enough truth to destroy him.
The more I research, the more this seems like an assassination based on complete lies: https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/930254839568769024/photo/1
-
There is no need to lie where there is enough truth to destroy him.
His wife claims those people were paid off, which seems like a big lie, and the yearbook thing is an obvious lie. Everyone is lying, and I don't know who to believe. I posted the info I found here, you have any outright evidence of his misconduct?
-
Clintons blaming Republicans.
-
Pedo alert!
By definition it is not consensual when it is a child. They are not capable of consent.
I bet you would argue that children should not be allowed to "consent" to a sex change operation decided on by heir parents for the same reason. Same logic applies here.
Claiming it was "consensual" is what every perverted sicko child rapist does.
Shii when I was 12 I was. When I was freeking 9, I knew what I was doing. That's for girls that were my age though, if it was an older lady, there's a sort of quid pro quo thing there, it's a lot more complicated to say no, it's not really consent. By the time I was 13 or 14, so then I was into my teachers for real after puberty is done you are what you are, you may not make the best decisions about love, but grown men aren't much better.
12 is old enough to consent to an operation, but sex changes are really just mutilation that don't change sex at all, so they should simply be illegal.
-
There are multiple accusers and multiple people confirming their stories plus his very weak and unconvicing denial.
His wife claims those people were paid off, which seems like a big lie, and the yearbook thing is an obvious lie. Everyone is lying, and I don't know who to believe. I posted the info I found here, you have any outright evidence of his misconduct?
-
Pedo alert!
By definition it is not consensual when it is a child. They are not capable of consent.
I bet you would argue that children should not be allowed to "consent" to a sex change operation decided on by their parents for the same reason. Same logic applies here.
Claiming it was "consensual" is what every perverted sicko child rapist does.
I'm speaking of consent according to Halacha. Men from age 13 and women from age 12 can get married. We don't do it today but it's still the law. Goyim don't need to get married to have sexual relations.
When people defend homosexuals, it's hypocritical if they speak against a man who has relations with a teenager. Homosexuality is way worse, consensual or not. As long as the woman went through puberty, it's not pedophilia, unless you go by civil law. That's the difference between Judaism and Islam. Islam allows men to have sex with girls younger than 10 years old. It's not normal to be attracted to a girl that age.
-
Roy Moore is good for Israel.
And why did these women wait until now to come forward? I think you know why. Politics.
Stepson of Roy Moore accuser calls her story a big lie: “Don’t believe a word she says” (https://jtf.org/stepson-of-roy-moore-accuser-calls-her-story-a-big-lie-dont-believe-a-word-she-says/)
-
I'm speaking of consent according to Halacha. Men from age 13 and women from age 12 can get married. We don't do it today but it's still the law. Goyim don't need to get married to have sexual relations.
Pedo alert!
Is this your attempt at a psak halacha? Because it's pure fraud.
When people defend homosexuals, it's hypocritical if they speak against a man who has relations with a teenager. Homosexuality is way worse, consensual or not. As long as the woman went through puberty, it's not pedophilia, unless you go by civil law. That's the difference between Judaism and Islam. Islam allows men to have sex with girls younger than 10 years old. It's not normal to be attracted to a girl that age.
Dude this is so clueless where do I begin?
I know homosexuals are your favorite pin cushion but no one here "defended homosexuals" so that's not even slightly germane to the argument. Care to try again?
It's cute thar you decide which sins are "worse" but again not relevant at all to the question. Idol worship is "worse" than stealing, does that mean stealing isn't evil? No.
Are you not aware that civil law is relevant to Halacha and obligatory on Jews? Pure ignorance.
Present day morals are also relevant because they have scientific basis and can't be ignored.
Lastly your comment is disgusting. It is not "normal" for an adult man to be attracted to a "gone through puberty" 14 or 15 year old either. It's perverted af.
That's the world we live in and anyone who acts with a minor needs to be put in jail and is a predator.
-
But it doesn't change the facts.
Roy Moore is good for Israel.
And why did these women wait until now to come forward? I think you know why. Politics.
Stepson of Roy Moore accuser calls her story a big lie: “Don’t believe a word she says” (https://jtf.org/stepson-of-roy-moore-accuser-calls-her-story-a-big-lie-dont-believe-a-word-she-says/)
-
Pedo alert!
Is this your attempt at a psak halacha? Because it's pure fraud.
I'm not a rabbi. Why doesn't some ask Chaim to comment or bring in a real rabbi to post?
Dude this is so clueless where do I begin?
I know homosexuals are your favorite pin cushion but no one here "defended homosexuals" so that's not even slightly germane to the argument. Care to try again?
I know, but the media that are accusing him are the same ones that defend homosexuality. Homosexuality is not natural. It is natural for a man to be attracted to a teenage girl if she has the body of a woman.
It's cute thar you decide which sins are "worse" but again not relevant at all to the question. Idol worship is "worse" than stealing, does that mean stealing isn't evil? No.
Relations with a teenage girl are not Gilui Arayot. I'm not sure where rape comes in for Noahides. Maybe it would be under kidnapping (a form of stealing). I'm not discussing rape.
Are you not aware that civil law is relevant to Halacha and obligatory on Jews?
I know. I'm talking about goyim. Does civil law fall under the commandment to set up a court system? Does a civil court have the status of "Rabbinic Noahide mitzvot" (for a lack of a better term)? The Noahide Laws carry the death penalty for violation. Does that mean that a Non-Jew who commits a minor traffic violation is chayav mita?
Present day morals are also relevant because they have scientific basis and can't be ignored.
There is scientific basis for the fact that a man can find a teenage girl attractive. Maybe not a 13 year old but certainly a 15 or 16 year old girl can be attractive. Not being attracted to her could be not normal since we all know homosexuality is not normal. That doesn't mean he has to have relations with her. We are not apes. We have free will not to do what our evil inclination wants us to do.
What about an 18 year old and a 17 year old? They may have met when they were both 17? If you go by the law of consent, then there is not difference between a 30 year old and an 18 year old.
According to what you say, then Jacob would be considered to be a "pedophile" for marrying Rachel when she was 13 (after working 7 years for her). The same with Isaac and Rebekah (she was 3 but since Isaac is not Mohammad, they didn't have relations until she was sexually mature). She was barren for 20 years and gave birth at the age of 23. Isaac was 60 when she gave birth.
I think we've discussed this before regarding the Patriarchs.
-
Why don't you have a seat over there.
-
But it doesn't change the facts.
Facts have proof. Allegations are not facts. Your bias does not prove anything.
Regardless of whether these allegations are true or not (I believe they are slander), they are attacking Roy Moore because he stands up for the Bible. The media was quick to attack Bill Clinton's accusers. The reason is obvious.
-
Well I don't deny the misdeeds of Clinton.
Facts have proof. Allegations are not facts. Your bias does not prove anything.
Regardless of whether these allegations are true or not (I believe they are slander), they are attacking Roy Moore because he stands up for the Bible. The media was quick to attack Bill Clinton's accusers. The reason is obvious.
-
Also, I find it suspicious that these allegations are coming out just now, being that the man has been a judge for a long time.
-
Roy Moore is good for Israel.
And why did these women wait until now to come forward? I think you know why. Politics.
Stepson of Roy Moore accuser calls her story a big lie: “Don’t believe a word she says” (https://jtf.org/stepson-of-roy-moore-accuser-calls-her-story-a-big-lie-dont-believe-a-word-she-says/)
I really wanted to believe in him, but this is just too much. He has been caught in too many lies and half-truths (like his "charitable speaking" fees). The GOP should have supported Mo Brooks in the primary but we had Trump backing the RINO hack and Bannon backing Moore who had these skeletons in his closet.
-
Pedo alert!
Is this your attempt at a psak halacha? Because it's pure fraud.
Dude this is so clueless where do I begin?
I know homosexuals are your favorite pin cushion but no one here "defended homosexuals" so that's not even slightly germane to the argument. Care to try again?
It's cute thar you decide which sins are "worse" but again not relevant at all to the question. Idol worship is "worse" than stealing, does that mean stealing isn't evil? No.
Are you not aware that civil law is relevant to Halacha and obligatory on Jews? Pure ignorance.
Present day morals are also relevant because they have scientific basis and can't be ignored.
Lastly your comment is disgusting. It is not "normal" for an adult man to be attracted to a "gone through puberty" 14 or 15 year old either. It's perverted af.
That's the world we live in and anyone who acts with a minor needs to be put in jail and is a predator.
Thank you.
-
I know, but the media that are accusing him are the same ones that defend homosexuality. Homosexuality is not natural. It is natural for a man to be attracted to a teenage girl if she has the body of a woman.
Really, dude? You are a moron. So Red State and Nat'l Review are defending homosexuality? I swear, your posts get crazier with each passing year.
-
I mean the main stream media defends homosexuality. CNN, MSNBC, etc....
Among the major cable news networks, only FOX News defended him (as far as I know).
-
Where is the visible audio and visible evidence on Roy Moore, where was it on Herman Cain? There isn't any, and why doesn't smut peddler Gloria Allred hand over the yearbook so the forged writting can be proven? This is about persecution of a Christian Conservative, while the left and their phonies like Al Franken will get a pass for actually feeling out Leeanne Tweeden on CAMERA, and at other times trying to stick his tongue in her mouth, not just while touring with the USO. Other lefties like Harvey Weinstein, Anthony Weiner, (who is in jail) Charlie Sheen, Kevin Spacey, just to mention a few, have years of sexual perversion and attacks on many women to their name.
Is anyone aware of the secret Shush Fund in Washington that is used to defend congressmen who attack women staffers....and its paid for by the American taxpayer. The Left can't even bet the plank out of their own eye, let alone accusing others.
-
It has nothing to do with anything here. First off, he's Christian and not Noahide..therefore according to Noahide rules, he breaks a big rule of accepting a human as Gd's son or as Gd himself.
Secondly, men are not permitted to make unwanted advances to women of any age if it is unwanted, whether she is of halakhic age or lawful age.
Thirdly, I have no clue nor any evidence to prove him guilty..so it all depends on the intentions of the news and women coming forward just now.
I didn't judge him by Jewish Law. I judged him by Noahide Law. Jews are forbidden from pre-marital sexual relations. Goyim are not. Jews aren't even supposed to kiss before marriage. I don't think he had sexual relations with them. If it was consensual, then there's no problem at all. I don't care if they were minors under civil law.
-
It has nothing to do with anything here. First off, he's Christian and not Noahide..therefore according to Noahide rules, he breaks a big rule of accepting a human as Gd's son or as Gd himself.
I know he's Christian. But we have to judge him by our standards, not his. If someone accused him of idolatry, then we would agree with that accusation even thought Christianity disagrees.
Secondly, men are not permitted to make unwanted advances to women of any age if it is unwanted, whether she is of halakhic age or lawful age.
I was talking about if it was consensual.
Thirdly, I have no clue nor any evidence to prove him guilty..so it all depends on the intentions of the news and women coming forward just now.
He's not guilty of what he is accused of. But if he was, there's things a lot worse that are tolerated by the main stream media. Bill Clinton actually raped women. The mainstream media worships homosexuality. I don't have to tell you that homosexuality is one of the three cardinal sins. Rape is bad but it's not one of the three cardinal sins. Sexual immorality includes homosexuality and other forbidden relations. Rape is wrong but it would only be considered under sexual immorality if done to a woman whose not permitted to the man even consensually (such as a married woman or incest).
-
http://jtf.org/forum/index.php/topic,90101.0.html