JTF.ORG Forum
The Worldwide Crisis of Islam => The Truth About Islam => Topic started by: admin on November 07, 2007, 03:46:12 PM
-
Due to recent events, I just wanted to make that clear.
-
No righteous person or organisation can tollerate islam anymore than they could nazism. It is an evil, monstrous ideology whose believers and apologists are evil.
-
Due to recent events, I just wanted to make that clear.
Then Yacov debate it. You just seem to state that Islam is a Nazi religion. Full stop. Prove your point!
-
Due to recent events, I just wanted to make that clear.
Then Yacov debate it. You just seem to state that Islam is a Nazi religion. Full stop. Prove your point!
Turn on the TV.
Senior iSSlamic clerics all over the world are calling for:
The destruction of Israel, the muder of Jews, the destruction of the west, the islamic takeover of the world, the forced conversion or death of all non-muSSlims...........the list goes on and on.
BTW, these are SENIOR CLERICS, Sarah.
And on top of all that, there NONE,ZERO, ZILCH muSSlims protesting or speeking out against these clerics.
PROOF!!!!!!!
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They are myths and lies to you Newman because you are in favour of Israel.
A war is going on. There are two sides. Obviously the muslims side with the Arabs, and so they won't say great things about Israel and yes probably exaggerate and make up lies.
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They NEVER say ...." Shiek Abduhll Mulla-Fakkir is preaching false Islam and has it wrong and we condemn him". They make general comments about 'radical clerics'. If they don't name them, there is NO real criticism.
Their condemnation of terror is always "We condemn terror on both sides" meaning islamic terror is unfortunate but a legitimate answer to western 'terror'. In other words NO condemnation.
When they claim iSSlam opposes attacks on the "innocent" they don't explain that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
I say again....they are NOT genuine. They are also in a tiny minority.
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They NEVER say ...." Shiek Abduhll Mulla-Fakkir is preaching false Islam and has it wrong and we condemn him". They make general comments about 'radical clerics'. If they don't name them, there is NO real criticism.
Their condemnation of terror is always "We condemn terror on both sides" meaning islamic terror is unfortunate but a legitimate answer to western 'terror'. In other words NO condemnation.
When they claim iSSlam opposes attacks on the "innocent" they don't explain that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
I say again....they are NOT genuine. They are also in a tiny minority.
Thats a very true and good point.
Yacov, they believe in Muhammad and have taken the shahadah so they are muslims, whether they are hypocrites according to the rules of Islam or even bad people. They are still muslims.
-
Did I miss something?
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They NEVER say ...." Shiek Abduhll Mulla-Fakkir is preaching false Islam and has it wrong and we condemn him". They make general comments about 'radical clerics'. If they don't name them, there is NO real criticism.
Their condemnation of terror is always "We condemn terror on both sides" meaning islamic terror is unfortunate but a legitimate answer to western 'terror'. In other words NO condemnation.
When they claim iSSlam opposes attacks on the "innocent" they don't explain that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
I say again....they are NOT genuine. They are also in a tiny minority.
Thats a very true and good point.
Yacov, they believe in Muhammad and have taken the shahadah so they are muslims, whether they are hypocrites according to the rules of Islam or even bad people. They are still muslims.
Also Sarah,
Under islamic law a woman must have FOUR witnesses for word to be taken over that of a man. Do you agree with this?
In countries where sharia operates, female rape victims are beaten or stoned because they had "sex"! Do you agree with that?
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
"The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism"
LOL
"The Muslim Council of Britain" is the UK's version of CAIR, and only pretends to condone Islamic terrorism, that you bring them up is really quite funny:
http://mcbwatch.blogspot.com/
-
Due to recent events, I just wanted to make that clear.
Then Yacov debate it. You just seem to state that Islam is a Nazi religion. Full stop. Prove your point!
Sarah, you are not stupid. I have the sira of Ibn Ishaq, the works of Buhari and the Quran. This is evil, without any doubt. Mohammed was an evil human. I remember the story of the tribe of Banu Qurayza. I remember that Mohamed agrees with the killing of a pregnant woman. I remeber that Mohammed gives the order to kill his critics. Everyday, even in the leftwing press, are terrible stories about muslimes, which kill other peoples without mercy. They kill their own women and children.
In a lot of countries where muslimes live are terrible killings like in Europe under the rule of the Nazis. Algeria, Irak, Sudan, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Pakistan etc.
In this so called religion is nothing positive, only death :(
-
JTF should not tolerate croats either
-
Also Sarah,
Under islamic law a woman must have FOUR witnesses for word to be taken over that of a man. Do you agree with this?
In countries where sharia operates, female rape victims are beaten or stoned because they had "sex"! Do you agree with that?
You're not quite right newman, The accuser in a sexual case must have four witnesses, or it is decided that the accused is right, whichever way round accuser and accused are, you are of course correct that a woman who accusses a man of rape without finding four witnesses will be executed for adultery. When I say witnessess, a man counts as one, a woman only counts as a half.
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They NEVER say ...." Shiek Abduhll Mulla-Fakkir is preaching false Islam and has it wrong and we condemn him". They make general comments about 'radical clerics'. If they don't name them, there is NO real criticism.
Their condemnation of terror is always "We condemn terror on both sides" meaning islamic terror is unfortunate but a legitimate answer to western 'terror'. In other words NO condemnation.
When they claim iSSlam opposes attacks on the "innocent" they don't explain that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
I say again....they are NOT genuine. They are also in a tiny minority.
Thats a very true and good point.
Which proves our point.
If iSSlam's senior clerics and schollars preach a nazi-type ideology and there are no iSSlamic voices of real protest or condemnation the iSSlam is a nazi ideology.
-
What is there to debate, Sarah? Go read the Koran.
-
Sarah, I would be happy to debate Islam with you at any time and at any place.
But let me start with one thing that you may not be aware of.
In order for you to be a Muslim, you have to beleive that G-d gave divine revelation to Muhammad WHILE HE WAS ENGAGED IN SEX WITH A NINE YEAR OLD GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Muhammad says this in the Hadith.
I can furnish the quotes as soon as you think whether or not YOU beleive that G-d appears to his prophets WHILE THEY ARE HAVING SEX WITH LITTLE CHILDREN.
Sarah, you seem like a smart girl.
Do you actually beleive that?
-
Sarah is a teenager don'nt bring up sexuel quotes from the Koran
-
Sarah, I would be happy to debate Islam with you at any time and at any place.
But let me start with one thing that you may not be aware of.
In order for you to be a Muslim, you have to beleive that G-d gave divine revelation to Muhammad WHILE HE WAS ENGAGED IN SEX WITH A NINE YEAR OLD GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Muhammad says this in the Hadith.
I can furnish the quotes as soon as you think whether or not YOU beleive that G-d appears to his prophets WHILE THEY ARE HAVING SEX WITH LITTLE CHILDREN.
Sarah, you seem like a smart girl.
Do you actually beleive that?
What hadith? ???
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They NEVER say ...." Shiek Abduhll Mulla-Fakkir is preaching false Islam and has it wrong and we condemn him". They make general comments about 'radical clerics'. If they don't name them, there is NO real criticism.
Their condemnation of terror is always "We condemn terror on both sides" meaning islamic terror is unfortunate but a legitimate answer to western 'terror'. In other words NO condemnation.
When they claim iSSlam opposes attacks on the "innocent" they don't explain that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
I say again....they are NOT genuine. They are also in a tiny minority.
Thats a very true and good point.
Which proves our point.
If iSSlam's senior clerics and schollars preach a nazi-type ideology and there are no iSSlamic voices of real protest or condemnation the iSSlam is a nazi ideology.
Even in Judaism there are reform Jews who allow homosexuality etc and the same in christianity. Though they still lead some churches and synagogues.
-
Sarah, I would be happy to debate Islam with you at any time and at any place.
But let me start with one thing that you may not be aware of.
In order for you to be a Muslim, you have to beleive that G-d gave divine revelation to Muhammad WHILE HE WAS ENGAGED IN SEX WITH A NINE YEAR OLD GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Muhammad says this in the Hadith.
I can furnish the quotes as soon as you think whether or not YOU beleive that G-d appears to his prophets WHILE THEY ARE HAVING SEX WITH LITTLE CHILDREN.
Sarah, you seem like a smart girl.
Do you actually beleive that?
What hadith? ???
Bukhari:V9B87N139-40
Tabari VII:7
Bukhari:V5B57N119
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
They are not genuine.
They always refuse to condemn, criticise or correct other clerics by name or hammas, PLO, al fatah etc.
They say they condemn violence but always justify terror by citing myths and lies about Israel.
They are standing on Live TV condeming the evil clerics! They are Genuine.
The PLO, hamas and fatah are also political. They do not comment on the issue in the middle-east because it is a controversial issue and they have no need to discuss it. They do however condemn all acts of terrorism.
They NEVER say ...." Shiek Abduhll Mulla-Fakkir is preaching false Islam and has it wrong and we condemn him". They make general comments about 'radical clerics'. If they don't name them, there is NO real criticism.
Their condemnation of terror is always "We condemn terror on both sides" meaning islamic terror is unfortunate but a legitimate answer to western 'terror'. In other words NO condemnation.
When they claim iSSlam opposes attacks on the "innocent" they don't explain that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
I say again....they are NOT genuine. They are also in a tiny minority.
Thats a very true and good point.
Which proves our point.
If iSSlam's senior clerics and schollars preach a nazi-type ideology and there are no iSSlamic voices of real protest or condemnation the iSSlam is a nazi ideology.
Even in Judaism there are reform Jews who allow homosexuality etc and the same in christianity. Though they still lead some churches and synagogues.
1/ They are a minority sect
2/ there are many more Jews who preach the opposite
3/ They are condemned by the Orthodox who are the only legitimate Jews
4/ Being lax about personal morality is no threat to you or I.
Don't try and draw a moral equivelence between (minority) reform rabbis tollerating gays and 99.9% of iSSlamic clerics calling for the death or dihmmitude of all non-muslims.
-
So people don;t have to look it up themselves:
Volume 5, Book 57, Number 119:
Narrated Hisham's father:
The people used to send presents to the Prophet on the day of 'Aisha's turn. 'Aisha said, "My companions (i.e. the other wives of the Prophet) gathered in the house of Um Salama and said, "0 Um Salama! By Allah, the people choose to send presents on the day of 'Aisha's turn and we too, love the good (i.e. presents etc.) as 'Aisha does. You should tell Allah's Apostle to tell the people to send their presents to him wherever he may be, or wherever his turn may be." Um Salama said that to the Prophet and he turned away from her, and when the Prophet returned to her (i.e. Um Salama), she repeated the same, and the Prophet again turned away, and when she told him the same for the third time, the Prophet said, "O Um Salama! Don't trouble me by harming 'Aisha, for by Allah, the Divine Inspiration never came to me while I was under the blanket of any woman amongst you except her."
remember, Muhammad is over 50 at this point, and Aisha is 9.
-
Due to recent events, I just wanted to make that clear.
Then Yacov debate it. You just seem to state that Islam is a Nazi religion. Full stop. Prove your point!
You read my mind, exactly!
-
Due to recent events, I just wanted to make that clear.
Then Yacov debate it. You just seem to state that Islam is a Nazi religion. Full stop. Prove your point!
You read my mind, exactly!
Read: http://jtf.org/forum_english/index.php?topic=3995 I didn't write this stuff for nothing you know.
-
The way to deal with evil is not to ban it, but to debate it and to "answer" it.
-
The way to deal with evil is not to ban it, but to debate it and to "answer" it.
Read this whole thread. We just have "answered it".
-
The way to deal with evil is not to ban it, but to debate it and to "answer" it.
See my previous post.
-
So people don;t have to look it up themselves:
Volume 5, Book 57, Number 119:
Narrated Hisham's father:
The people used to send presents to the Prophet on the day of 'Aisha's turn. 'Aisha said, "My companions (i.e. the other wives of the Prophet) gathered in the house of Um Salama and said, "0 Um Salama! By Allah, the people choose to send presents on the day of 'Aisha's turn and we too, love the good (i.e. presents etc.) as 'Aisha does. You should tell Allah's Apostle to tell the people to send their presents to him wherever he may be, or wherever his turn may be." Um Salama said that to the Prophet and he turned away from her, and when the Prophet returned to her (i.e. Um Salama), she repeated the same, and the Prophet again turned away, and when she told him the same for the third time, the Prophet said, "O Um Salama! Don't trouble me by harming 'Aisha, for by Allah, the Divine Inspiration never came to me while I was under the blanket of any woman amongst you except her."
remember, Muhammad is over 50 at this point, and Aisha is 9.
Thanks, if you have time, please do the same with the other two quotes.
Sarah, do you have anything to say about these?
-
Nazis wanted to take over the world, we didnt debate them, we defeated evil....muslims want to make the world islamic(take it over), why should we debate them?
All I ever see are muslim groups saying they are "sorry for loss if innocent life" its WHO they consider "innocent" they never mention.
-
Nazis wanted to take over the world, we didnt debate them, we defeated evil....muslims want to make the world islamic(take it over), why should we debate them?
All I ever see are muslim groups saying they are "sorry for loss if innocent life" its WHO they consider "innocent" they never mention.
We have to debate them to prove to the world as a whole that the muslims are wrong, then we will have more support.
-
Nazis wanted to take over the world, we didnt debate them, we defeated evil....muslims want to make the world islamic(take it over), why should we debate them?
All I ever see are muslim groups saying they are "sorry for loss if innocent life" its WHO they consider "innocent" they never mention.
Exactly the point I made earlier.
They never reveal that in iSSlam, no non-muSSlim is considered innocent.
-
Nazis wanted to take over the world, we didnt debate them, we defeated evil....muslims want to make the world islamic(take it over), why should we debate them?
All I ever see are muslim groups saying they are "sorry for loss if innocent life" its WHO they consider "innocent" they never mention.
We have to debate them to prove to the world as a whole that the muslims are wrong, then we will have more support.
I dont need to prove that islam is evil, muslims are doing that everyday. It took 3000 Americans being killed by muslims for many of my fellow citizens to see the truth, and I think thats what it will take again to smarten the rest of us, of course there are some who choose to believe stupid consiracy stuff, and they will never believe us no matter what. How long have the fakeistinians been murdering innocent people, and most of the world STILL feels sorry for them, they are pure evil and still most of the world supports them, some people just dont care to see things for what they are no matter what is said or done.
-
Nazis wanted to take over the world, we didnt debate them, we defeated evil....muslims want to make the world islamic(take it over), why should we debate them?
All I ever see are muslim groups saying they are "sorry for loss if innocent life" its WHO they consider "innocent" they never mention.
We have to debate them to prove to the world as a whole that the muslims are wrong, then we will have more support.
I dont need to prove that islam is evil, muslims are doing that everyday. It took 3000 Americans being killed by muslims for many of my fellow citizens to see the truth, and I think thats what it will take again to smarten the rest of us, of course there are some who choose to believe stupid consiracy stuff, and they will never believe us no matter what. How long have the fakeistinians been murdering innocent people, and most of the world STILL feels sorry for them, they are pure evil and still most of the world supports them, some people just dont care to see things for what they are no matter what is said or done.
Half-witted liberals will never believe that muSSlims or any group of non white, non-Judaic/christian people are a threat. It would destroy their whole twisted world view. A liberal will see his family raped and murdered in front of him and his city in flames at the hands of muSSlims and he'll still think it's America's fault and these people really want peace.
-
(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o143/badmensch/IslamLaw.jpg)
-
Anyway I agree all Islamic supporter should never be tolerated.
Islam needs to be fully removed from all corners of this earth.
-
(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o143/badmensch/IslamLaw.jpg)
Wow! That's some pretty strong stuff! Where did you get this from? Or did you create this yourself? Quite creative and innovative if this is your own!
-
No Islam in JTF ? Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
>:(
(http://dogfightatbankstown.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/09/02/rage_boy.jpg)
-
(http://dogfightatbankstown.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/09/02/rage_boy.jpg)
Can anyone come up with one good reason why pigs like this should be allowed to breath?
-
No Islam in JTF ? Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
>:(
(http://dogfightatbankstown.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/09/02/rage_boy.jpg)
You know that guy gets paid to do that ::)
-
Oh thats islamic rage boy...the jihad poster boy...he is their finest :::D
(http://hangrightpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/cave2bman.jpg)
-
Oh thats islamic rage boy...the jihad poster boy...he is their finest :::D
(http://hangrightpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/cave2bman.jpg)
And those *ssholes call the Jews "pigs and monkies"?????????
SHEEESH!!!! They should look in the damn mirror!!!!!!!!
-
This is a relevant excerpt of what Uri Blau, from the traitorous pro-Arab, Hashertz, or Haaertz anti-Israel rag wrote about Chaim, JTF, Ronny and the Kahanist movement, in a recent radical-left, self-hating, ant-semitic article:
“Ronny - whoever he is - is not the only Jewish anti-Semite on the Web. Dozens of video clips can be found on Israeli and foreign sites of a person named Chaim Ben Pesach… who describes himself as having been Rabbi Meir Kahane's assistant in the United States. Ben Pesach, who heads the JTF (Jewish Task Force), spent several years in prison in the United States for planting bombs in the consulate of the former Soviet Union, in the period when the USSR prohibited Jews from immigrating to Israel. Ben Pesach maintains that he is not allowed to enter Israel and that the last time he tried to immigrate to Israel he was deported back to the United States.
”Ben Pesach's texts, mostly in poor Hebrew (though also in English on YouTube, for example) are riddled with expressions of hatred for Arabs and sharp anti-left pronouncements. He wants the Arabs expelled from Israel and urges the establishment of a Kahanist government. He seems to have found quite an easy way to evade the strictures of Israeli law. The file-sharing site Flix on the Tapuz portal contains dozens of video clips of his, which get tens of thousands of hits a month. Thus, within a few months Ben Pesach became a far-right curiosity, and on a site that is aimed at children and teenagers. “
-
"Announcement: JTF Does NOT tolerate Islam."
JTF is right.
O0
But we know JTF is right, already.
:)
-
i for one do not tolerate islam its an evil religion and i hate it always!
-
Then Yacov debate it. You just seem to state that Islam is a Nazi religion. Full stop. Prove your point!
Do you see anything wrong with this? "8:12 Lo! Thy Sustainer inspired the angels [to convey this His message to the believers]: "I am with you !" [13] [And He commanded the angels:] "And, give firmness unto those who have attained to faith [with these words from Me]: [14] `I shall cast terror into the hearts of those who are bent on denying the truth; strike, then, their necks, [O believers,] and strike off every one of their finger-tips!" [15]," do you think Muhammad is a prophet and if you do was he right in massacring the Jews of Arabia? We don't need to debate a Nazi religion.
-
I tolerate Islam, not happily, but while they are here in this world I have to tolerate them, that is of course until we bomb the **** out of them, then I won't have to tolerate them! yay! :::D
-
In the UK there is. The Muslim Council of Britain and many other organisations have initiated schemes to combat radicalism etc. You see them on the TV here.
sarah, I know muslims in the UK. I have many muslim friends when I was in a muslim area. They were radical though. Their ideal was for britain to be under Sharia.
There have been 1 or 2 programs exposing the MCB...
Panorama with John Ware , it was amazing. Didn`t you see it?
He exposed them masterfully.
And the MCB supports Yusuf Al Qaradawi, the anti-semitic sheikh that supports suicide bombing in israel..
Furthermore, pakistani religious muslims laugh at the MCB, they see them as "coconuts" (brown on the outside, white on the inside). They seem them as assimilationists!!
The religious muslims I knew would tell me that they were against suicide bombing period. But they still didn`t want israel to exist.. And they still hated israel. And they still wanted a palestinian state.
George Bush also wants a palestinian state.. He is not a nazi. I don`t see muslims as nazis.. I get on better with some of them than with leftist jews. But for practical purposes, I don`t think it`s so bad if people think muslims are all bad. I don`t expect people to have an enlightened understanding of muslims like I do, from knowing them. And if people are going to hate muslims then the world is safer than if they are going to like them and be influenced by them.
I wouldn`t call muslims nazis.. Muslims are yishmaelites, can be wild. I understand that.
Nazis were cold, organised.
Practically speaking, muslim nations want to kill us. So I don`t really object to them being called "nazis". It does identify the enemy generally and the seriousness of the problem.
-
Here is the panorama program exposing the muslim council of britain
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/4727513.stm
click "watch video"
-
"Announcement: JTF Does NOT tolerate Islam."
And neither do I, but I am sure most of you already know that. ;)