JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Kiwi on January 06, 2008, 01:11:47 AM
-
Do you think of Canadian Indians how you think of American Indians? What about The Aborigines in Australia and The Maoris in New Zealand? As the natives, do they have rights to be be in those countries like American Indians have the right to be here or are they a threat to the local white Anglo majorities? I know Newman speaks poorly of "The Abbos" in Australia like we speak of American blacks.
They are not natives, never will be!
The Moriori's are the only race that can claim that.
No matter how many history books they change, real New Zealanders know the truth.
Maori's can change the written word, but they can't change the truth.
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
I find it very racist to suggest Whites are civilised :::D :::D
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
I find it very racist to suggest Whites are civilised :::D :::D
:::D :::D ;D :D :D
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
I find it very racist to suggest Whites are civilised :::D :::D
:::D :::D ;D :D :D
Blacks, OK, mexicans , without any doubt,
Muslims, the best prophet ever,
But Whites ???
Are you completely mad!!??
These animals are destroying the planet with their "civilisation"
Good for them the mothership is coming hahaha
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
I find it very racist to suggest Whites are civilised :::D :::D
:::D :::D ;D :D :D
Blacks, OK, mexicans , without any doubt,
Muslims, the best prophet ever,
But Whites ???
Are you completely mad!!??
These animals are destroying the planet with their "civilisation"
Good for them the mothership is coming hahaha
de spayship be, id' b' ova us. ;D
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moriori
The debunked myth of Moriori in New Zealand
The genocide of the Moriori, and the loss of their voice as a people led to the folowing - New Zealand popular culture of the early twentieth century long held an unsubstantiated myth that the 'Moriori', a small-statured dark-skinned race of possible Melanesian origin, originally inhabited New Zealand before the lighter-skinned Māori arrived and drove the Moriori out to the Chathams. This story conveniently promoted racist stereotyping and justified the idea of colonisation by cultural 'superiors'[4], but has no historical or anthropological merit. Michael King's Moriori: A People Rediscovered (2000) provides the only comprehensive and systematic account of Moriori. Its publication helped finally dispel longstanding misrepresentations and untruths about Moriori which formerly circulated among the New Zealand population.
Thats written by half cast leftie commies fags. They even tried to say these people never existed. They are a true race and true natives, and don't give me that Wiki bull to me. I know any nut case with half a braincell can post on that site. These same morons stated that maoris pulled New Zealand up from the ocean with an old womans jaw bone! AND you believe that too.
First you support gentiles over jews, then Asians Nazi over whites, and now you dismiss a whole race because a coon told you too.
Franky I can't see any point in supporting Jewish Task Force if this is your ideas.
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
Of course not. Well it was more the French they brought the brothels.
-
Aren't Europeans the natives? ;D ;) If I remember correctly they did bring civilization and advance the place. ;D ;) :)
I find it very racist to suggest Whites are civilised :::D :::D
:::D
-
Skippy.
i have no idea what Moaris are.
Is that garbage-people?
-
Skippy.
i have no idea what Moaris are.
Is that garbage-people?
Maoris are cook islanders that came on to New Zealand land and massacred the natives.
-
Skippy.
i have no idea what Moaris are.
Is that garbage-people?
Maoris are cook islanders that came on to New Zealand land and massacred the natives.
Is that a problem?
-
Who were the Natives of the Land
that was to be called "New-Zealand" ?
???
-
Skippy.
i have no idea what Moaris are.
Is that garbage-people?
Maoris are cook islanders that came on to New Zealand land and massacred the natives.
Is that a problem?
Of Course its a problem to ethnic cleansing of a peaceful people, and stealing their culture, their home everything. Then remove them from the history books.
-
Who were the Natives of the Land
that was to be called "New-Zealand" ?
???
I always thought Europeans were the natives since they advanced the culture O0
-
Who were the Natives of the Land
that was to be called "New-Zealand" ?
???
I always thought Europeans were the natives since they advanced the culture O0
Being a Native AND advancing one Culture
are two totaly different things, my JTFFan Brother.
;)
-
Who were the Natives of the Land
that was to be called "New-Zealand" ?
???
Moriori they were the peaceful people from the Chatham Islands, made a home in New Zealand, the first people ever in New Zealand. Its their land, their home, and the NAZI stormtroopering Maoris Killed them, ate them and took everything just days before Captain Cook claimed New Zealand. The Maoris where a tribe of outcasts from the other Islands.
The Islanders law was to drive out murders and rapist from the Islands, they formed a group of rubbish and created a tribe called the Maoris.
Thats why all Islanders hate the sight of them even today.
And thats not in the history books either because its just not PC >:(
The Maoris succeed where Hitler failed with the Jews.
-
Who were the Natives of the Land
that was to be called "New-Zealand" ?
???
I always thought Europeans were the natives since they advanced the culture O0
No Europeans are not natives, but settlers.
-
But they were still there before whites. It's like arguing over which Indian tribe came to America first or which Abbo tribes came to Australia first. It's just different tribes that were native to the region. New Zealand is a part of Polynesia. Polynesians are just different tribes, no differnet than how one Indian tribe is different than another.
I'm not saying Maoris have the rights to NZ. I was just asking Chaim what he thinks because I know he doesn't oppose American Indians.
Well no again Yacov , the Dutch were there before the Maoris thats why it was call New Zealand , as in Zeeland in Holland >:(
And it makes a huge difference to New Zealand, maybe not to you, but why would you care anyway.
ITS NOT YOUR HOME!
-
But they were still there before whites. It's like arguing over which Indian tribe came to America first or which Abbo tribes came to Australia first. It's just different tribes that were native to the region. New Zealand is a part of Polynesia. Polynesians are just different tribes, no differnet than how one Indian tribe is different than another.
I'm not saying Maoris have the rights to NZ. I was just asking Chaim what he thinks because I know he doesn't oppose American Indians.
Well no again Yacov , the Dutch were there before the Maoris thats why it was call New Zealand , as in Zeeland in Holland >:(
And it makes a huge difference to New Zealand, maybe not to you, but why would you care anyway.
ITS NOT YOUR HOME!
SO it is Dutch then.
-
But they were still there before whites. It's like arguing over which Indian tribe came to America first or which Abbo tribes came to Australia first. It's just different tribes that were native to the region. New Zealand is a part of Polynesia. Polynesians are just different tribes, no differnet than how one Indian tribe is different than another.
I'm not saying Maoris have the rights to NZ. I was just asking Chaim what he thinks because I know he doesn't oppose American Indians.
Well no again Yacov , the Dutch were there before the Maoris thats why it was call New Zealand , as in Zeeland in Holland >:(
And it makes a huge difference to New Zealand, maybe not to you, but why would you care anyway.
ITS NOT YOUR HOME!
SO it is Dutch then.
Yes and No the Dutch didn't really want it only used it as a port for whaling and sealing. Like the used Australia too.
-
But they were still there before whites. It's like arguing over which Indian tribe came to America first or which Abbo tribes came to Australia first. It's just different tribes that were native to the region. New Zealand is a part of Polynesia. Polynesians are just different tribes, no differnet than how one Indian tribe is different than another.
I'm not saying Maoris have the rights to NZ. I was just asking Chaim what he thinks because I know he doesn't oppose American Indians.
Well no again Yacov , the Dutch were there before the Maoris thats why it was call New Zealand , as in Zeeland in Holland >:(
And it makes a huge difference to New Zealand, maybe not to you, but why would you care anyway.
ITS NOT YOUR HOME!
SO it is Dutch then.
Yes and No the Dutch didn't really want it only used it as a port for whaling and sealing. Like the used Australia too.
It's both a Yes/No answer ;)
-
But they were still there before whites. It's like arguing over which Indian tribe came to America first or which Abbo tribes came to Australia first. It's just different tribes that were native to the region. New Zealand is a part of Polynesia. Polynesians are just different tribes, no differnet than how one Indian tribe is different than another.
I'm not saying Maoris have the rights to NZ. I was just asking Chaim what he thinks because I know he doesn't oppose American Indians.
Well no again Yacov , the Dutch were there before the Maoris thats why it was call New Zealand , as in Zeeland in Holland >:(
And it makes a huge difference to New Zealand, maybe not to you, but why would you care anyway.
ITS NOT YOUR HOME!
SO it is Dutch then.
Yes and No the Dutch didn't really want it only used it as a port for whaling and sealing. Like the used Australia too.
It's both a Yes/No answer ;)
It shows the Dutch were a good nation once.
look at it now, Rotterdam 56% non-Europeans
-
56% is extremely high and I'm guessing it's all black/muSSlim/Crapistan/Asian! >:(
-
56% is extremely high and I'm guessing it's all black/muSSlim/Crapistan/Asian! >:(
\
officially it is 45,7% , but that doesn't count illegals.
Every year, the amount of non-Westerners grows with 1%.
-
56% is extremely high and I'm guessing it's all black/muSSlim/Crapistan/Asian! >:(
\
officially it is 45,7% , but that doesn't count illegals.
Every year, the amount of non-Westerners grows with 1%.
wow, sounds like the most rapid non-Western place in the Netherlands, secondly must be Amsterdam either or there's alot of Arab muSSlim black iSSlam scum there >:(
-
56% is extremely high and I'm guessing it's all black/muSSlim/Crapistan/Asian! >:(
\
officially it is 45,7% , but that doesn't count illegals.
Every year, the amount of non-Westerners grows with 1%.
wow, sounds like the most rapid non-Western place in the Netherlands, secondly must be Amsterdam either or there's alot of Arab muSSlim black iSSlam scum there >:(
Brussels has officially 56,6 % immigrants.
you don't want to know what the real figure is.
-
56% is extremely high and I'm guessing it's all black/muSSlim/Crapistan/Asian! >:(
\
officially it is 45,7% , but that doesn't count illegals.
Every year, the amount of non-Westerners grows with 1%.
wow, sounds like the most rapid non-Western place in the Netherlands, secondly must be Amsterdam either or there's alot of Arab muSSlim black iSSlam scum there >:(
Brussels has officially 56,6 % immigrants.
you don't want to know what the real figure is.
geeze, I definitely understand where you're coming from >:(
Anyone that doesn't hate these muSSlim Arab Nazis must be insane, especially if they are living with thousands of them! >:(
Either that or they are tolerant and liberally bendover backwards to these apes!
-
56% is extremely high and I'm guessing it's all black/muSSlim/Crapistan/Asian! >:(
\
officially it is 45,7% , but that doesn't count illegals.
Every year, the amount of non-Westerners grows with 1%.
wow, sounds like the most rapid non-Western place in the Netherlands, secondly must be Amsterdam either or there's alot of Arab muSSlim black iSSlam scum there >:(
Brussels has officially 56,6 % immigrants.
you don't want to know what the real figure is.
geeze, I definitely understand where you're coming from >:(
Anyone that doesn't hate these muSSlim Arab Nazis must be insane, especially if they are living with thousands of them! >:(
Either that or they are tolerant and liberally bendover backwards to these apes!
I'd expel 99% of them.
-
Exactly what needs to be done! O0
-
But they were still there before whites. It's like arguing over which Indian tribe came to America first or which Abbo tribes came to Australia first. It's just different tribes that were native to the region. New Zealand is a part of Polynesia. Polynesians are just different tribes, no differnet than how one Indian tribe is different than another.
I'm not saying Maoris have the rights to NZ. I was just asking Chaim what he thinks because I know he doesn't oppose American Indians.
Well no again Yacov , the Dutch were there before the Maoris thats why it was call New Zealand , as in Zeeland in Holland >:(
And it makes a huge difference to New Zealand, maybe not to you, but why would you care anyway.
ITS NOT YOUR HOME!
SO it is Dutch then.
Yes and No the Dutch didn't really want it only used it as a port for whaling and sealing. Like the used Australia too.
It's both a Yes/No answer ;)
Yes lol See before the English was the French, and it was a matter of who raised their flags first, so we could really had a tie. :::D
-
:::D :::D :::D
-
Can you explain how the Maoris are not natives? Who are the real natives? You're not suggesting that it is the europeans who are really the natives are you? That's almost as retarded as the muslims claiming that they were the first non-Aboriginees to set foot on Australian soil (and they have claimed that). Abel Tasman discovered New Zealand in 1642 and then promptly left, the Maori's were there for 800 years prior to that. The name "New Zealand" was first used in 1645.
-
Can you explain how the Maoris are not natives? Who are the real natives? You're not suggesting that it is the europeans who are really the natives are you? That's almost as retarded as the muslims claiming that they were the first non-Aboriginees to set foot on Australian soil (and they have claimed that). Abel Tasman discovered New Zealand in 1642 and then promptly left, the Maori's were there for 800 years prior to that. The name "New Zealand" was first used in 1645.
if you read from the beginning its all there. And with your comments it proves you need to read all the posts and learn from it.
-
I've read everything. In none of your posts have you substantiated your claim, it has mainly been rhetoric.
-
I've read everything. In none of your posts have you substantiated your claim, it has mainly been rhetoric.
Its people like you that support the Multiculturalist in destroying a nation.
I have given you more than enough levy way, it is now ended.
-
What has this got to do with "multiculturalists"? All I have asked is for you to substantiate your spurious claims with some actual evidence.
-
What has this got to do with "multiculturalists"? All I have asked is for you to substantiate your spurious claims with some actual evidence.
What did the post say it was the multi culturalist changed the texts and history books. The truth will die out when people forget it
-
And I am asking for evidence that history has been changed by these "multiculturalists"? If one starts revising documented history in one part of the world then why would anyone believe that person when they object to other revisionist history, for example, the historicity of a "palistinian" people?
-
And I am asking for evidence that history has been changed by these "multiculturalists"? If one starts revising documented history in one part of the world then why would anyone believe that person when they object to other revisionist history, for example, the historicity of a "palistinian" people?
This was done before you were born and not uploaded to the internet, you need to go to things called books. Which many were ever reprinted and banned. Around the same time as Noddy and Big Ears was banned, and removed, with little Black Sambo.
A huge shift occured , even to the removal of English as the first language.
This started in the late 70's and ended with a mass leaving of New Zealand in the late 80's due to Whites being classed as second class citizens.
You will not find everything on the net, and if you think you can you are very narrow focused.
The thing is New Zealand unlike other countries in this world kept their business to themselves.
-
Provide somes sources from these "books" or at least give us some names of books in which you have researched your pretty lame position from.
The only argument that you have come up with is one of the dumbest things I've ever read, that because the dutch named New Zealand, then they have to be the indigenous people.
-
Provide somes sources from these "books" or at least give us some names of books in which you have researched your pretty lame position from.
The only argument that you have come up with is one of the dumbest things I've ever read, that because the dutch named New Zealand, then they have to be the indigenous people.
I never said the Dutch were natives, I said they were there before the maoris, then the frogs and then the Pommies.
I said the Moriori's were and thats in the First post.
-
The Making of the Maori: Culture Invention and Its Logic
Allan Hanson
American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 91, No. 4 (Dec., 1989), pp. 890-902
I haven't seen a full transcript on the net
(http://www.jstor.org/jstor/gifcvtdir/ap001553/00027294/ap020478/02a00050_l.1.gif?config=jstor&K=user@user_response/81mAWqTOpX5t92dgG0/40/4km9xOcm/300027294.ap020478.02a00050.0/2yXO4WzGVsgGx2SKHQD2RY)
-
I thought everyone might enjoy this article O0
Christian Branches, Maori Roots: The Cult of Rua
Allan Hanson
History of Religions, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Nov., 1990), pp. 154-178
Its such a shame i don't have the full lot, it goes through the bull Maoris pass off.
(http://www.jstor.org/jstor/gifcvtdir/ap002496/00182710/ap030105/03a00030_l.1.gif?config=jstor&K=user@user_response/81mAX8SugX5t9ROGe0/40/4km9xOjW/300182710.ap030105.03a00030.0/9bNpvyGHg0gGYRcjgB-hX)
-
Race, Colour and Identity in Australia and New Zealand
Book by John Docker, Gerhard Fischer; University of New South Wales Press, 2000
Great book even explains about maoris not being a race until 1975, because the name Maori was just used as a collective term for all Islanders.
-
And anyone like myself that states the facts are called racist right wingers. A very proud label I wear. O0
-
All nations are settlers beside maybe szwartza from Africa, if you belive in African craddle theory ::), and all are "natives" after second or third generation after the arival. That's why all nativist movements are :D. Being of earlier wave of settlement don't give you any "birth right". Maori and Pals shud learn this.
-
All nations are settlers beside maybe szwartza from Africa, if you believe in African cradle theory ::), and all are "natives" after second or third generation after the arrival. That's why all nativist movements are :D. Being of earlier wave of settlement don't give you any "birth right". Maori and Pals should learn this.
But Pals only came in the last hundred years. The Canaanites are the original inhabitants, not The Pals.
I know this but they and their western apologists always use this false arguments claiming Pals to be first as descendents of Jebusites or atleast living continiusly from 135 AD, which is double false.