JTF.ORG Forum
Save Western Civilization => Save Europe => Topic started by: Ulli on August 25, 2008, 11:28:12 AM
-
No joke the project is funded by the big company Bertelsmann
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/thumb/f/fa/Bibel_in_gerechter_Sprache.jpg/180px-Bibel_in_gerechter_Sprache.jpg)
They want to make it more comfortable for women, gays and of course Jews. ;D
It is politial correct. No joke
So they replaced the word adonay (lord) from the locations in the text where it is written by
The living, the she-livinge, HeShe, the eternal, the she-eternal, Schechina, god, I am here
because lord is too sexist.
Of course they have some socialist Jews like Micha Brumlik in the adviser staff.
Selfhating Christians and Selfhating Jews together: The result would be funny, if they don't would poison with their sick ideology the minds of so many people. :(
Sources:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibel_in_gerechter_Sprache
http://www.bibel-in-gerechter-sprache.de/
-
So they are like Reformed deformed Jews :-\
-
So they are like Reformed deformed Jews :-\
So called progressive Judaism is imo not evil like this, or did they rewrite the Tanach?
I think this is noncompetitive :( :( :(
-
So they are like Reformed deformed Jews :-\
So called progressive Judaism is imo not evil like this, or did they rewrite the Tanach?
I think this is noncompetitive :( :( :(
Deformed prayer books also use the gender nuetral words. It is a complete desecration of the holy works of the great assembly.
muman613
-
So they are like Reformed deformed Jews :-\
So called progressive Judaism is imo not evil like this, or did they rewrite the Tanach?
I think this is noncompetitive :( :( :(
Yes it's gender neutral i think on passover they have prayers for black slaves
-
Oh I see. We live in really evil times. :( :( :(
-
Oh I see. We live in really evil times. :( :( :(
Yes for sure they rewrite everything
-
Bertelsmann is a big company they publish in the U.S. also
-
Oh I see. We live in really evil times. :( :( :(
Yes for sure they rewrite everything
what would make them do such a thing, what evil force would possess them to rewrite the holy scriptures ? ???
-
also i have reformed jewish cousins, so please take it down a notch. although they dont pray or read that garbage O0
-
If they're twisting it to say things it doesn't say, then I think I'd be less offended if they just burned it.
Technically I think G-d is a spirit and created male and female people and animals. G-d wouldn't technically have a gender, would He?
I can't figure out what's so offensive about L-rd though. It's a term of reverence and respect.
-
If they're twisting it to say things it doesn't say, then I think I'd be less offended if they just burned it.
Technically I think G-d is a spirit and created male and female people and animals. G-d wouldn't technically have a gender, would He?
I can't figure out what's so offensive about L-rd though. It's a term of reverence and respect.
but some people woul consinder lord a male gender
-
If they're twisting it to say things it doesn't say, then I think I'd be less offended if they just burned it.
Technically I think G-d is a spirit and created male and female people and animals. G-d wouldn't technically have a gender, would He?
I can't figure out what's so offensive about L-rd though. It's a term of reverence and respect.
Judaism explains quite clearly why Hashem is referred to in masculine terms at times and in feminine terms at times. There is an explicit reason for this. To change the scripture entirely undermines the entire text. There are many interesting kabbalistic concepts which are learned from which aspect of Hashem is acting. In general the Male gender is the one who gives and the female form is the one who receives. When Hashem is referred to as a HE, he is the giver. When Hashem is referred to as SHE, as in the Schechina, she is receiving. This mirrors the male/female dynamic concerning procreation. The male gives the seed, the female receives it and nurtures it.
It is important to remember that Hashem has no body or form. Hashem is neither male or female. But as Humans we need to be able to have a relationship with Hashem and we ascribe these qualities to Hashem.
It is patently wrong and against the word of Hashem, who wrote in last weeks portion that not a word should be added nor a word removed from the text of Torah.
muman613
-
If they're twisting it to say things it doesn't say, then I think I'd be less offended if they just burned it.
Technically I think G-d is a spirit and created male and female people and animals. G-d wouldn't technically have a gender, would He?
I can't figure out what's so offensive about L-rd though. It's a term of reverence and respect.
Judaism explains quite clearly why Hashem is referred to in masculine terms at times and in feminine terms at times. There is an explicit reason for this. To change the scripture entirely undermines the entire text. There are many interesting kabbalistic concepts which are learned from which aspect of Hashem is acting. In general the Male gender is the one who gives and the female form is the one who receives. When Hashem is referred to as a HE, he is the giver. When Hashem is referred to as SHE, as in the Schechina, she is receiving. This mirrors the male/female dynamic concerning procreation. The male gives the seed, the female receives it and nurtures it.
It is important to remember that Hashem has no body or form. Hashem is neither male or female. But as Humans we need to be able to have a relationship with Hashem and we ascribe these qualities to Hashem.
It is patently wrong and against the word of Hashem, who wrote in last weeks portion that not a word should be added nor a word removed from the text of Torah.
muman613
I agree 100%. It is necessary to hear/read the truth, however described it is. We have no right to make up stories. Imo this is blasphemy and heretic.
-
They are incredibly stupid, don't they get that what they do is like modifying works of art to make them more decent, only much worse.....
-
Thanks for going into more detail muman. I think I understand where these revisers went terribly, terribly wrong.