JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: takebackourtemple on April 19, 2010, 08:13:46 PM

Title: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: takebackourtemple on April 19, 2010, 08:13:46 PM: Great Episode. Now the Muslim Nazis are threatening violence against them.

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/19/security-brief-radical-islamic-web-site-takes-on-south-park/?hpt=T2
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: TruthSpreader on April 19, 2010, 08:17:46 PM: Any time Muslims are pissed off is good. They get rid angry at everything, even cartoons.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 19, 2010, 11:30:34 PM: It's not the Muslims Matt and Trey have to worry about, it's the Gingers!

They will have their furious revenge, after they extract Mohammed's goo!

(http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a110/Matsuka/gingers.jpg)
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:47:07 AM: You guys get the joke of this episode? Because of mohammed, muslims get away with any type of violence they want whether it is the threat of violence or actual violence. The gingers and reject movie stars think it is mohammed's goo that will make them this powerful. Lol.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:49:59 AM: Actually won't be surprised if they reveal that cartmen's dad is mohammed of which his goo was given to his mom making cartmen the bigot he is on the show.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 09:17:50 AM: Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:49:59 AM
Actually won't be surprised if they reveal that cartmen's dad is mohammed of which his goo was given to his mom making cartmen the bigot he is on the show.

It would be hilarious if Cartman's dad was Mohammed. It would certainly explain his hatred of Jews.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: New Yorker on April 20, 2010, 06:54:53 PM: This is serious, the Islamonazi psychos are threatening Matt and Trey. >:(
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: muman613 on April 20, 2010, 07:29:20 PM: Quote from: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 09:17:50 AM
Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:49:59 AM
Actually won't be surprised if they reveal that cartmen's dad is mohammed of which his goo was given to his mom making cartmen the bigot he is on the show.

It would be hilarious if Cartman's dad was Mohammed. It would certainly explain his hatred of Jews.

I thought it was clear that Cartman was of German descent... Didn't he wear a Nazi uniform for a holoween costume?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Jew

Quote
... In a rally outside the South Park theater at which The Passion is being shown, Cartman yells antisemitic German at his followers, who mistake it for Aramaic. The members agree to take to the streets, and begin marching after Cartman, who is goose-stepping and chanting in German. ...
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: New Yorker on April 20, 2010, 07:38:22 PM: I salute Matt and Trey, they've got balls, they're not intimidated by the Islamonazi's and they made these episodes to make that point.

Hats off to them. The rest of the media is muslim as* kissing p*ssies!
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 11:16:59 PM: He's not necessarily of any one descent. He was shouting in German because he admires Hitler, not because he has any particular heritage. He's generic "white" just like the other kids.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 11:19:14 PM: Quote from: New Yorker on April 20, 2010, 06:54:53 PM

This is serious, the Islamonazi psychos are threatening Matt and Trey. >:(

They knew what they were getting into when they made the episode. They're doing it anyway.

I keep laughing when I think of the part where Buddha snorts coke. :::D
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: muman613 on April 20, 2010, 11:33:47 PM: I haven not watched SouthPark in over 10 years... I once worked for a company developing video games and everyone in that company would watch SouthPark in the lunchroom together.... I got tired of it quickly especially because of Cartman. I also generally don't enjoy comedy which is insulting to certain groups... Of course the 'great' thing about SP is that it is an equal opportunity offender. But I reason that just because you offend everyone doesn't necessarily mean it is right to offend anyone. Remembering the laws of Lashon Hara, a Jew must work hard not to belittle or diminish a fellow Jew in anyones eyes.

I also think that SP amounts to 'scoffing' which is an activity which our Holy Torah frowns on... This is why I bring the following reference to Pirkie Avot Chapter 3 Mishnah 3 and the associated commentary from Torah.org...

http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter3-3.html?print=1

Pirkei Avos
Laughing in the Face of Reality
Chapter 3, Mishna 3

"Rabbi Chanina ben (son of) Tradyon said, if two people sit together and do not share words of Torah between them, it is a company of scorners, as the verse states, 'In the company of scorners he [the righteous man] did not sit [rather in G-d's Torah was his desire...]' (Psalms 1:1-2). But if two people sit and share words of Torah between them the Divine Presence rests between them, as the verse states, 'Then spoke those who fear G-d one to another, and G-d listened and heard, and it was written in a book of remembrance before Him, for those who fear G-d and regard His Name' (Malachi 3:16). From here we learn only about two. How do we know that even one who sits and studies Torah that the Holy One, blessed be He, allocates him reward? [It is] as the verse states, 'He will sit alone and be silent (studying by himself), for it [a reward] will be placed upon him' (Lamentations 3:28)."

Our mishna draws up a powerful contrast -- between two people who share words of Torah and two who do not. One pair merits the Divine Presence, while the other constitutes a company of scorners ("leitzim" in Hebrew; we'll use the Hebrew term below).

"Leitz" is a very strong term in the language of both Scripture and the Sages. Literally translated, it means something like a joker, but the connotation is far more negative. (In modern Hebrew a "leitzan" is a clown.) It implies someone who laughs but does not laugh in humor but in derision. He scoffs; he laughs because he does not want to take life seriously. He ridicules serious issues. He laughs off criticism and cannot be held down to intense conversation about life and religion. His humor is inappropriate; he uses it as a protective shield against serious reflection. The Talmud lists four classes of people who will not "receive the Divine Presence" in the World to Come (Sotah 42a). The first one listed is the class of leitzim. If you don't want to think about G-d and your responsibilities towards Him, chances are He will want to have nothing to do with you as well.

We've all had the annoying experience of attempting to engage a leitz in serious conversation. Such a person cannot be reasoned with. You may be trying to help him deal with a problem or patch up a relationship (possibly with yourself). And he cannot be made to face reality. His humor is utterly and infuriatingly out of place. Disagreeing with me is one thing, but at least take me or this issue seriously! How can you joke when life-decisions are at stake? As I've written in the past, right or wrong is the second issue. But by far the most fundamental issue of life is realizing it must be taken seriously.

In Proverbs King Solomon warns us, "Do not reprimand a leitz lest he hate you" (Mishlei 9:8). Such a person is beyond cure and beyond repentance. You can tell him whatever you want -- all the wise words and constructive criticism you can muster, but the first spark of contemplation must come from within. You can fan the flames, but only his own reflection can ignite the fires of conscience. The leitz, by contrast, will brush off all your attempts at reason with a joke. He will use humor to escape reality rather than to liven it, and he will only resent your attempt at penetrating his protective barrier. Humor used to lighten, to befriend and to cheer is fine. It serves as yet another good illustration that all our talents and drives can and should be used properly within a Jewish framework. However, when someone uses humor to escape the challenges and the decisions of life, he is a prime candidate to "not receive the Divine Presence."

The "company of scorners" to which R. Chanina refers too lives up to this term. Explains the commentator Rabbeinu Yonah, it refers to people who join together to engage in idle and empty conversation. Wasting time is another excellent way of not taking life seriously. Sit around "killing" time, let the hours pass amusing yourself with talk of sports, scandal and gossip. Fill your brain with meaningless diversions -- listen to 24-hour talk radio -- for otherwise you might just realize the awful truth of your wasted existence.

Such a leitz is one who does not take his time -- and by association his life -- very seriously. Say two people cross paths for a few minutes and spend the time talking of wasteful trivialities. Their sin is not only in the two minutes they did not use well. It is in their demonstration that a few minutes is not important, that an opportunity to share thoughts and words of value can be passed up. However, for better or worse, life is made up of a whole lot of "two minutes." How well we are fulfilling our missions on earth is a composite of a lifetime of minutes, not of years. We must see all the opportunities of life -- both the large and the small, take them seriously, and rise to their challenge.

In similar vein, R. Samson Raphael Hirsch understands that the converse -- the discussion of "words of Torah" referred to in the next part of the mishna -- does not necessarily refer to Torah study alone. Any valuable conversation -- anything deriving from the Torah's teachings or necessary for human life -- stands in stark contrast to the idle chatter of the scoffer. Our mishna is not saying one should never speak anything other than Torah or that socializing should never occur. The Talmud writes that the "light talk" of great Torah scholars is the equivalent of words of Torah (Eiruvin 54b). If talk is to share feelings and emotions with another, to befriend and develop serious relationships, it too is praiseworthy. Scoffers do not take life seriously. If, however, two people talk to each other because they *do*, their conversation beckons the Divine Presence just as much as the scoffer drives it away.

There is a second fault with the leitzim of our mishna. R. Yom Tov Lipman Heller (16th - 17th Century German scholar), in his commentary Tosafos Yom Tov, observes that the mishna does not just refer to people who are not studying Torah, but who are not sharing words of Torah *between* them. They may very well be engrossed in their own studies, but they are ignoring each other. And this too reflects a serious lack of understanding. To fail to recognize the value of another human being and his or her opinions, to show no interest in hearing his Torah thoughts or sharing your own with him: this too is in the spirit of the "leitz". It reflects a lack of placing importance on that which certainly should be regarded: another human being. We will learn later, "Who is wise? One who learns from all people" (4:1 http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter4-1a.html (http://www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter4-1a.html)). Torah study is not only an internal duty. The Torah should be sought from all who have to offer it and shared with all willing to listen.

I once heard a different understanding of our mishna (source unknown). It is a little less in keeping with the literal meaning of our mishna -- it employs a little Chassidic poetic license -- but it provides us with yet another fascinating insight into the words of our Sages.

If two people are together in a certain place and do not discuss words of Torah, we can be sure that the place had *previously* been a hangout of scoffers. Meaning, if these people cannot bring themselves to study now, it is likely that they are in a place where sins have been committed and time has been wasted in the past. The place exudes a certain sinfulness, and these individuals are helpless to combat it.

The message of this is clear. Sin has an effect on the surroundings. If a person sins he does not only defy G-d's will. He does not even only harm his soul. He damages the very environment in which the sin was committed. Sinful behavior is not eco-friendly (sorry about the buzzword). There is a palpable difference in a place influenced by bad deeds (or good ones). We may not be consciously aware of it, but the residue of sin remains. Such a place develops its own nature which will be all the more difficult to overcome.

It was said of R. Elchanan Wasserman, during his stay in America shortlybefore the War, that he was being driven in New York and his driver chanced to pass a block of ill-repute. The rabbi, who had not once lifted his head to look out the window, all of a sudden cried out: "Where are you taking me?! The tumah (impurity) of this place is unbearable!"

(I myself have noticed the difference between praying at a synagogue and at a home -- possibly in the den, in front of the television set (even turned off it ain't much better). The Talmud tells us that G-d's Presence dwells in a synagogue (Brachos 6a), whereas some places are somehow just not conducive to meditation.)

Many other illustrations of this phenomenon exist in Jewish sources. The Sages tell us that when man became morally sinful in the period before the Flood, the animals too began mating outside of their species. (See Rashi to Genesis 6:12.) Likewise, the Talmud records two cases in which the donkeys of righteous people acted "righteously". (In one case a donkey refused to eat produce not properly tithed; in another it refused to carry off something not belonging to its master. See Chullin 7a and Ta'anis 24a). The animals of such people, though bearing no conscious knowledge of Torah law, developed an instinctive sense of right and wrong just from their proximity to such greatness. For good deeds improve the world about, and bad ones equally well destroy and corrupt it. In a few weeks (Mishna 9), I plan to discuss the Jewish view on the environment. But let us first realize the enormous impact we, the members of the human race, have on the spiritual one.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: muman613 on April 20, 2010, 11:57:54 PM: Honestly the thing which sickens me the most is the comments which I read on CNN and other left-leaning web news sites where everyone comes down on G-d himself because of the actions of these slimey muslims. I sometimes want to try to explain to them that it is not G-d which is acting, but the free will of these muslim madmen. I do not watch SP because it offends me, I sometimes wish it would offend more people, but I have the free will to not watch it...
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: MassuhDGoodName on April 21, 2010, 01:40:09 AM: muman613, I too find SouthPark offensive and in very poor taste.

Even its 'animation' is done on the cheap.

In my opinion, there's a time and place for humor based on irreverence and nothing being treated as sacred [Mark Twain a perfect example], but SouthPark is really more a statement on how low the American cultural and intelligence level has fallen.

There is also more than a subtle undercurrent of leftist propaganda woven through each and every episode.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Dr. Dan on April 21, 2010, 05:15:13 AM: I have to disagree about not joking at serious things.

When a husband wife are having a serious arguement that is very emotional, to throw in a joke to cause laughter ends the arguement.

But then again, I'm not sure if this is the same thing.

Cartem btw is not German and it wasn't halloween where he was action like a Nazi.....like it matters.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: takebackourtemple on April 21, 2010, 06:06:10 AM: Quote from: muman613 on April 20, 2010, 07:29:20 PM
Quote from: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 09:17:50 AM
Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:49:59 AM
Actually won't be surprised if they reveal that cartmen's dad is mohammed of which his goo was given to his mom making cartmen the bigot he is on the show.

It would be hilarious if Cartman's dad was Mohammed. It would certainly explain his hatred of Jews.

I thought it was clear that Cartman was of German descent... Didn't he wear a Nazi uniform for a holoween costume?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Jew

Quote
... In a rally outside the South Park theater at which The Passion is being shown, Cartman yells antisemitic German at his followers, who mistake it for Aramaic. The members agree to take to the streets, and begin marching after Cartman, who is goose-stepping and chanting in German. ...

Cartman is an anti-semite in the cartoon. I think if anything, it is good that they do this because they show how bad anti-semitism is. In one of my favorite episodes, Cartman is harassing Kyle for the entire episode and threatening to beat him up. When Cartman actually attacks Kyle, Kyle punches back and the cowardly Cartman starts to cry after one punch. I liked that episode because it showed the anti-semites being powerless and the Jew being powerful when doing the right thing and standing up for himself.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Dr. Dan on April 21, 2010, 06:44:25 AM: Quote from: takebackourtemple on April 21, 2010, 06:06:10 AM
Quote from: muman613 on April 20, 2010, 07:29:20 PM
Quote from: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 09:17:50 AM
Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:49:59 AM
Actually won't be surprised if they reveal that cartmen's dad is mohammed of which his goo was given to his mom making cartmen the bigot he is on the show.

It would be hilarious if Cartman's dad was Mohammed. It would certainly explain his hatred of Jews.

I thought it was clear that Cartman was of German descent... Didn't he wear a Nazi uniform for a holoween costume?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Jew

Quote
... In a rally outside the South Park theater at which The Passion is being shown, Cartman yells antisemitic German at his followers, who mistake it for Aramaic. The members agree to take to the streets, and begin marching after Cartman, who is goose-stepping and chanting in German. ...

Cartman is an anti-semite in the cartoon. I think if anything, it is good that they do this because they show how bad anti-semitism is. In one of my favorite episodes, Cartman is harassing Kyle for the entire episode and threatening to beat him up. When Cartman actually attacks Kyle, Kyle punches back and the cowardly Cartman starts to cry after one punch. I liked that episode because it showed the anti-semites being powerless and the Jew being powerful when doing the right thing and standing up for himself.

While I agree in this instance, this show also portrays Kyle and his family as stereotypical self-hating Jews...either they are making fun of all Jews or more specifically self-hating Jews. I don't think there is a Kahanist character.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: HiWarp on April 21, 2010, 06:51:00 AM: Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 21, 2010, 06:44:25 AM
Quote from: takebackourtemple on April 21, 2010, 06:06:10 AM
Quote from: muman613 on April 20, 2010, 07:29:20 PM
Quote from: Rubystars on April 20, 2010, 09:17:50 AM
Quote from: Dr. Dan on April 20, 2010, 05:49:59 AM
Actually won't be surprised if they reveal that cartmen's dad is mohammed of which his goo was given to his mom making cartmen the bigot he is on the show.

It would be hilarious if Cartman's dad was Mohammed. It would certainly explain his hatred of Jews.

I thought it was clear that Cartman was of German descent... Didn't he wear a Nazi uniform for a holoween costume?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Jew

Quote
... In a rally outside the South Park theater at which The Passion is being shown, Cartman yells antisemitic German at his followers, who mistake it for Aramaic. The members agree to take to the streets, and begin marching after Cartman, who is goose-stepping and chanting in German. ...

Cartman is an anti-semite in the cartoon. I think if anything, it is good that they do this because they show how bad anti-semitism is. In one of my favorite episodes, Cartman is harassing Kyle for the entire episode and threatening to beat him up. When Cartman actually attacks Kyle, Kyle punches back and the cowardly Cartman starts to cry after one punch. I liked that episode because it showed the anti-semites being powerless and the Jew being powerful when doing the right thing and standing up for himself.

While I agree in this instance, this show also portrays Kyle and his family as stereotypical self-hating Jews...either they are making fun of all Jews or more specifically self-hating Jews. I don't think there is a Kahanist character.

Why don't you contact them and suggest a Kahanist character? But, if they do it, I would be prepared for the consequences.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 21, 2010, 09:15:56 AM: There were two episodes where Cartman dressed up like a Nazi (at least). One of them was on Halloween. A woman from the school told him the costume wasn't appropriate and showed him a video about Hitler to try to explain to him why the costume was bad. Instead of learning a lesson he started saluting to the video and grinning. The teacher made him change his costume to a "scary ghost" instead, but it ended up looking like a KKK costume, which scared Chef.

The other episode that I know of was when he was trying to rally people in an anti-Semitic parade after the Passion movie was out.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: muman613 on April 22, 2010, 01:05:15 AM: Oh No!

It looks like the network caved into the muslims threats of violence and censored the episode. This is truly sad news for all those who stood for freedom of speech and expression and all that good stuff.... It looks like the maniacal threats from the slobbering hordes of bloodthirsty muslims finally scared the bejezus out of the executives at the network.

You know full well if it were the requests from any sane religion, and not from the cult of violence, these requests would have been promptly ignored. It seems that the terrorists have truly won, and only 10 years after the horror of 9/11.... The terrorists have seemed to have won this round.... It is very very sad!

Apparently they took out all references to Mohamud and instead substituted a SantaClaus character {which this series seems to like to belittle and debase every chance they get}.... These spineless wussies at Comedy Central...

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2110092420100422?type=marketsNews

LOS ANGELES, April 21 (Reuters) - Satirical animated TV show "South Park" beeped out the words Prophet Muhammad and plastered its Wednesday episode with the word "CENSORED" after being issued a grim warning by a U.S. Muslim group.

The irreverent comedy show on Comedy Central also substituted a controversial image seen last week of the Prophet Muhammad in a bear outfit with one of Santa Claus in the same costume.

It was not immediately clear if the move was a bid to tread carefully following the warning against the "South Park" creators, or if they were poking fun at the fuss.

The little-known group RevolutionMuslim.com posted a message on its website earlier this week warning creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker "that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh for airing this show."

The website posted a graphic photo of Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker who was killed in 2004 by an Islamic militant over a movie he had made that accused Islam of condoning violence against women. It also posted a link to a news article with details of a mansion in Colorado that Parker and Stone apparently own.

Most Muslims consider any depiction of the founder of Islam as offensive.

The website warning followed the first in a two-part episode of "South Park" a week ago in which Prophet Mohammad was depicted in a bear outfit.

"South Park" has a history of biting satire against politicians, celebrities and the media. The two Colorado filmmakers are known to often work on "South Park" until just before they air, enabling them to react to current events.

In Wednesday's new episode, Jesus Christ was depicted watching pornography and Buddha was portrayed snorting cocaine.

The head of Revolution Muslim, Younus Abdullah Muhammad, 30, defended the Web posting by his group.

"How is that a threat?," he told Reuters earlier on Wednesday. "Showing a case study right there of what happened to another individual who conducted himself in a very similar manner? It's just evidence."

According to U.S. law enforcement officials, the federal government rarely prosecutes threat cases. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives broad protections to free speech, and what constitutes a threat is often subject to interpretation.

Muhammad described his group as an alternative media outlet with about 20 active posters to the website. He said the group "didn't tell anyone to go to their houses and conduct violence" against Parker or Stone.

Comedy Central, a unit of Viacom Inc (VIAb.N), has declined to comment on the controversy. (Additional reporting by Louis Charbonneau; editing by Jill Serjeant and Mohammad Zargham) (please visit our entertainment blog via www.reuters.com or on blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/)

Notice the heinous taqiya employed by the vile specimen called Mohammud : ""How is that a threat?," he told Reuters earlier on Wednesday. "Showing a case study right there of what happened to another individual who conducted himself in a very similar manner? It's just evidence.""

On the website the implication was that anyone who portrayed their idol mohamud in a negative light would have violent death brought upon him by crazed muslims... There is no other interpretation of what was said... It was obviously a threat on the lives of the SouthPark creators.... These slimey lying bastard dirtbag muslims sure don't lie very well...
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 01:14:32 AM: The stupid thing about this is that they did show Mohammed in a previous episode so there's no reason why he should be censored out now.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: muman613 on April 22, 2010, 01:19:15 AM: Quote from: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 01:14:32 AM
The stupid thing about this is that they did show Mohammed in a previous episode so there's no reason why he should be censored out now.

Sorta like trying to shove the Jack In the Box back into the box.... It just doesn't go back inside....

(http://www.clown-ministry.com/images/clown-jack-in-the-box.jpg)
Mohammud in a box
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: angryChineseKahanist on April 22, 2010, 07:39:28 AM: While making fun of muslim pigs is always good, they are definitely anti jew.
They are left wing scum. Don't be fooled. There are no conservative/right-wing shows on TV.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 08:28:13 AM: Nobody would mistake that show for a right wing one if they watched it. However I think they should be able to make fun of mohammed in any way they want to considering how much they make fun of Jesus and how they show Moses as a floating glowing head that wants kids to make macaroni pictures for him.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: New Yorker on April 22, 2010, 08:30:16 AM: Quote from: angryChineseKahanist on April 22, 2010, 07:39:28 AM

While making fun of muslim pigs is always good, they are definitely anti jew.
They are left wing scum. Don't be fooled. There are no conservative/right-wing shows on TV.

You're wrong there bro, the South Park guys are not left wing at all, they always rip on the leftists. Do you see their movie America World Police, the butt of all their jokes were hollywood liberals, actually in these last two episodes discussed in this thread they were ripping on the hollywood liberals. As a matter of fact, there's a term used to describe young conservatives, they're called South Park Republicans. They're not quite conservative, I'd call them Libertarian, but they're no friend to the left.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 08:31:57 AM: Quote from: New Yorker on April 22, 2010, 08:30:16 AM
Quote from: angryChineseKahanist on April 22, 2010, 07:39:28 AM

While making fun of muslim pigs is always good, they are definitely anti jew.
They are left wing scum. Don't be fooled. There are no conservative/right-wing shows on TV.

You're wrong bro, the South Park guys are not left wing at all, they always rip on the leftists. Do you see their movie America World Police, the butt of all their jokes were hollywood liberals, actually in these last two episodes they were ripping on the hollywood liberals.

That movie also "ripped on" people considered "jingos" by the leftists. They make fun of the right wing and left wing, but I think they do lean more left. Kim Jong Il's song in that movie was pretty freaking hilarious though. "I'm so ronery". lol
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: New Yorker on April 22, 2010, 08:36:23 AM: Quote from: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 08:31:57 AM
Quote from: New Yorker on April 22, 2010, 08:30:16 AM
Quote from: angryChineseKahanist on April 22, 2010, 07:39:28 AM

While making fun of muslim pigs is always good, they are definitely anti jew.
They are left wing scum. Don't be fooled. There are no conservative/right-wing shows on TV.

You're wrong bro, the South Park guys are not left wing at all, they always rip on the leftists. Do you see their movie America World Police, the butt of all their jokes were hollywood liberals, actually in these last two episodes they were ripping on the hollywood liberals.

That movie also "ripped on" people considered "jingos" by the leftists. They make fun of the right wing and left wing, but I think they do lean more left. Kim Jong Il's song in that movie was pretty freaking hilarious though. "I'm so ronery". lol

No not at all, in my estimation, they're Libertarian, yea so they're not purely conservative, they have libertarian leaning toward some social issues, but they're not leftist, there's a huge difference, they hate the left and mock them ruthlessly. The way they regect political correctness is fantastic.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Tippy on April 22, 2010, 01:12:17 PM: As a rule, we avoid watching S.P.. Family Guy is another hellivision show we avoid. These two shows are almost always blasphemous.

I have not seen the episode in question, I have seen some clips that showed the stick figure drawing which was supposed to be either the moon god allah, or the pedophile prophet muhammad, and I chuckled, I have to admit.

I have watched the episode that dealt with the mormons, and I thought that it was not only very funny, but from my knowledge of the history of the mormon church, they were fairly accurate.

But our media..... what a bunch of eunuch's!!! They are enough to gag a maggot off a gut wagon! I haven't seen this much estrogen in one place since I delivered birth control pills in cases stacked on pallets to Right Aid drugs headquarters in a Semi-Truck! Where are the men that used to be in the reporting business? Anne Coulter has more backbone, and more guts (and probably more testosterone) than 50 other men involved in the media, maybe even 100. In my humble opinion, she is a modern "Deborah".

Earth day = Idolatry , forced religion at the altar of Obama in our schools.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: angryChineseKahanist on April 22, 2010, 02:22:16 PM: I'm sorry, but the same south park people made team america where they depicted Kim Jung [mentally] Ill in a sympathetic way in a behind-the-scenes interview - if you get the DVD.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: briann on April 22, 2010, 07:26:28 PM: I can completely understand why many are offended by South park here, BUT, nonetheless we should support them in a 'big picture' sorta way.

By the way, this all reminds me of that teddy bear that someone named 'mahammad' and Muslims got angry and started killing other muslims.

I personally was very offended as I love teddy bears, and think its cruel to name them after a lunatic pedophile.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 08:04:00 PM: Briann that story was sad because it was a Western teacher who got into trouble, (I believe she was British), who had been brainwashed to believe that Muslims were peaceful and moral people. She asked the kids to name the teddy bear, and they named it after one of the popular boys in the class who happened to be named Mohammed.

There was no insult to the Pedophile Mohammed intended. This teacher, as naive and brainwashed as she was, didn't think that Muslims would react badly to something as innocent as the class naming a teddy bear.

I have to wonder what she thinks of Islam now.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: briann on April 23, 2010, 12:18:22 AM: Quote from: Rubystars on April 22, 2010, 08:04:00 PM
Briann that story was sad because it was a Western teacher who got into trouble, (I believe she was British), who had been brainwashed to believe that Muslims were peaceful and moral people. She asked the kids to name the teddy bear, and they named it after one of the popular boys in the class who happened to be named Mohammed.

There was no insult to the Pedophile Mohammed intended. This teacher, as naive and brainwashed as she was, didn't think that Muslims would react badly to something as innocent as the class naming a teddy bear.

I have to wonder what she thinks of Islam now.

The craziest thing was that people were even killed because of a teddy bear. Just like Muslims waring over a cartoon. The idiology that makes people kill based upon a teddy bear or a cartoon is seriously demented.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: angryChineseKahanist on April 23, 2010, 12:31:45 PM: Does anyone have the full video?
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Lisa on April 23, 2010, 04:49:15 PM: I've never watch any tv except maybe for Fox news once in a while, and the show "What Not To Wear." But this whole business about South Park making fun of Mohammed reminds me of the Monty Python movie "Life of Brian" which poked fun at Judaism and Christianity. Granted, there were Christian and Jewish leaders who found the movie very offensive. But I don't remember anyone threatening to kill the Monty Python actors.
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: Dr. Dan on April 25, 2010, 04:33:49 PM: http://www.southparkstudios.com/
Title: Re: South Parks 200th episode
Post by: rebel_conservative on April 26, 2010, 04:21:22 AM: technically, it wasn't 'censored' as that refers to govt. forcing someone to change what they say, do, publish.

However, whilst it is disappointing and weak that the network chose to alter the episode, you can not really blame them after the threat they received. Can you imagine if they did air the show unedited and someone got hurt? You can not expect a private business to run that risk. It is annoying that they pretend to be "edgy" but only ever go after the easy targets, Christians, Jews and even liberals, who they know will not respond with violence.

The biggest question here is why the govt and police did not step in and tackle the clear threat and intimidation? why was no-one arrested and prosecuted? the only answer I can see is that they are scared of Islam. It is a disgrace.