JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: IsraeliGovtAreKapos on June 06, 2010, 03:21:58 PM

Title: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: IsraeliGovtAreKapos on June 06, 2010, 03:21:58 PM
I think Arabs are mostly cowards, lazy and stupid. They always used deception and lies, and were always doomed and ruled by other nations, many times in history. The Turks, on the other hand, won their wars almost always fair and square and used brutal force combined with fighting skills, with the Byzantines, the Arabs, the Serbs, the Persians etc.

What do you think?
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: Zelhar on June 06, 2010, 03:44:14 PM
‎The Arabs are not good soldiers, yet they have carved up a huge empire. The Arab league combined is roughly 14 million square km. And It is still creeping further- Israel, Europe, Africa.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: TruthSpreader on June 06, 2010, 03:45:02 PM
Obviously the Turks. The Arabs are just stupid, lazy, primitive tribes. They can't even win a war against Disneyland let alone against little Israel.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: Hyades on June 06, 2010, 04:36:13 PM
Arabs are not got fighters and the Arab League is a big joke. They do not even like each other - a main reason for their weakness.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: judeanoncapta on June 06, 2010, 06:20:56 PM
I think the answer to this question was answered in WW1 when the Arabs overthrew the Turks.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: arksis on June 06, 2010, 07:13:40 PM
The arabs are worse than cockroaches, all they know how to do is breed and infest the world.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: TheCoon on June 06, 2010, 08:15:26 PM
The Turks are becoming savage muslims like their arab, pakistani and persian brothers. Soon they'll be completely inept at war just like the rest of those sand [censored].
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: MasterWolf1 on June 06, 2010, 08:23:44 PM
They are all Muslims so I don't call em fighters.. Cowards aren't fighters
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: Maccabee01 on June 06, 2010, 09:07:02 PM
Definitely the Turks.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: Aces High on June 06, 2010, 09:14:42 PM
I think it would depend whose breath was worse, or who has worse BO.  In the end I think they would stink each other into submission
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: Abben on June 06, 2010, 10:08:44 PM
I heard turks are good with a knife. But thats from the Godfather. I would say turks arabs don't fight they throw rocks and use ieds
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: IsraeliGovtAreKapos on June 06, 2010, 10:59:06 PM
Quote from: judeanoncapta on June 06, 2010, 06:20:56 PM
I think the answer to this question was answered in WW1 when the Arabs overthrew the Turks.

The Arab "rebellion"  was nothing but a scam of hundreds-thousands of camel riders who did nothing and sat idly while the Jews and the British did all the job.
Title: Re: Who are better fighters? Turks or Arabs?
Post by: Ben m on June 07, 2010, 01:04:25 AM
Quote from: Arise Judah on June 06, 2010, 10:59:06 PM
Quote from: judeanoncapta on June 06, 2010, 06:20:56 PM
I think the answer to this question was answered in WW1 when the Arabs overthrew the Turks.

The Arab "rebellion"  was nothing but a scam of hundreds-thousands of camel riders who did nothing and sat idly while the Jews and the British did all the job.
yes.but the turkish are lower than nothings.so i prefer to fight the turks.