JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: MasterWolf1 on March 24, 2011, 10:57:59 AM
-
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/24/7-0-quake-strikes-myanmmar/?iref=allsearch The shaking was strong enough to knock me off my feet, I live in NY we don't have quakes but I felt this mother. Some building damages around. The actual shake itself was 100KM over the border from me.
Thank you all mighty I want to get out in one piece
-
big boy could use his mama's hug right about now all i do is go send food to poor this is not part of the bargin
-
Oh my!
You are always in the middle of such catastrophes. Maybe it is time to come back and settle in a place which is less seismically active...
Stay safe.... We will be praying for you...
-
Oh my!
You are always in the middle of such catastrophes. Maybe it is time to come back and settle in a place which is less seismically active...
Stay safe.... We will be praying for you...
Don't you live in California? :::D
-
May G_d bless you:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/
-
Don't you live in California? :::D
I do... But we haven't had anything over a 6.0 in a long while... Honestly I don't think there are very many places which are 'Rock Solid' in that they don't have any seismic activity. I recently read that even NY may have a big earthquake some day...
http://www.earth.columbia.edu/articles/view/2235
Earthquakes May Endanger New York More Than Thought, Says Study
Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Seen As Particular Risk
A study by a group of prominent seismologists suggests that a pattern of subtle but active faults makes the risk of earthquakes to the New York City area substantially greater than formerly believed. Among other things, they say that the controversial Indian Point nuclear power plants, 24 miles north of the city, sit astride the previously unidentified intersection of two active seismic zones. The paper appears in the current issue of the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
Many faults and a few mostly modest quakes have long been known around New York City, but the research casts them in a new light. The scientists say the insight comes from sophisticated analysis of past quakes, plus 34 years of new data on tremors, most of them perceptible only by modern seismic instruments. The evidence charts unseen but potentially powerful structures whose layout and dynamics are only now coming clearer, say the scientists. All are based at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, which runs the network of seismometers that monitors most of the northeastern United States.
.
.
.
California has mini-earthquakes every day:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqscanv/Quakes/quakes_big.html
map 3.0 2011/03/22 14:24:20 32.679N 115.717W 7.3 13 km ( 8 mi) S of Seeley, CA
map 3.3 2011/03/21 23:26:10 33.985N 118.813W 1.8 6 km ( 4 mi) SSW of Malibu, CA
map 3.5 2011/03/21 13:42:26 39.122N 123.418W 5.2 18 km (11 mi) W of Ukiah, CA
map 3.2 2011/03/20 15:08:33 38.836N 122.756W 1.2 3 km ( 2 mi) W of Cobb, CA
map 3.5 2011/03/20 01:17:01 38.787N 122.772W 0.7 3 km ( 2 mi) ESE of The Geysers, CA
map 3.0 2011/03/18 18:31:14 32.107N 115.233W 10.0 23 km (15 mi) SSW of Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico
map 3.3 2011/03/17 20:17:43 32.215N 115.212W 10.0 13 km ( 8 mi) SW of Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico
-
I'm so glad you're fine.
-
Glad to hear you're okay.