JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: muman613 on March 27, 2011, 02:22:06 PM
-
This story is very disturbed... In the early days of the rebellion in Libya the madman Gadaffi was ranting that the rebels were being supported by Al-Queda elements. At the time I thought it was just a bluff by Qudafi in order to throw off the international pressure because everyone is afraid when they hear the name 'al-queda'.
But now it appears that there may be some truth to the idea that al-queda is involved in the rebellion against Kadaffi. That ugly-mug Gudaphi just may be onto something because Chads president claims that AQ in North Africa has stolen surface-to-air missiles from Libyan arsenals.
Look at this story:
http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2011/03/shocka-libyan-rebels-admit-al-qaeda.html
This shouldn't surprise anyone. At least some of the Libyan rebels are connected to al-Qaeda. And they've managed to use the current battles to equip themselves with surface-to-air missiles (Hat Tip: Gates of Vienna).
AL-QAEDA'S offshoot in North Africa has snatched surface-to-air missiles from an arsenal in Libya during the civil strife there, Chad's President says.
Idriss Deby Itno did not say how many surface-to-air missiles were stolen, but told the African weekly Jeune Afrique that he was "100 per cent sure" of his assertion.
"The Islamists of al-Qaeda took advantage of the pillaging of arsenals in the rebel zone to acquire arms, including surface-to-air missiles, which were then smuggled into their sanctuaries in Tenere," a desert region of the Sahara that stretches from northeast [censored] to western Chad, Deby said in the interview.
"This is very serious. AQIM is becoming a genuine army, the best equipped in the region," he said.
His claim was echoed by officials in other countries in the region who said that they were worried that al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) might have acquired "heavy weapons", thanks to the insurrection.
...
Elsewhere in the interview, Chad's president backed the assertion by his neighbour and erstwhile enemy Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi that the protests in Libya have been driven in part by al-Qaeda.
"There is a partial truth in what he says," Deby said.
"Up to what point? I don't know. But I am certain that AQIM took an active part in the uprising."
...
The Chadian leader described the international military intervention in Libya, launched a week ago by the United States, France and Britain, as a "hasty decision".
"It could have heavy consequences for the stability of the region and the spread of terrorism in Europe, the Mediterranean and the rest of Africa," he cautioned.
So the US, Britain and France are supporting a war that will give al-Qaeda another foothold in North Africa and arm them to boot. But don't worry: The Libyan rebels have already asked France to leave.
What could go wrong?
-
I know this must be tough Muman, but as much as you hate Qadaffi (and we all do), the Rebels are even worse; and Im starting to wonder if Obama understands this too.
They are Islam in its purest form.... and as Chaim always says, if Muhammad were alive today, he would be a member of Al Queda.
-
I know this must be tough Muman, but as much as you hate Qadaffi (and we all do), the Rebels are even worse; and Im starting to wonder if Obama understands this too.
They are Islam in its purest form.... and as Chaim always says, if Muhammad were alive today, he would be a member of Al Queda.
I know that those who want to replace gudaffi are wicked and evil... But we should not accept any evil, in an ideal world...
-
I know this must be tough Muman, but as much as you hate Qadaffi (and we all do), the Rebels are even worse; and Im starting to wonder if Obama understands this too.
They are Islam in its purest form.... and as Chaim always says, if Muhammad were alive today, he would be a member of Al Queda.
Absolutely.
The equation is really not so simple. Many complex quantities are hidden in to it and so the complex repercussions thereof.
So the things shall continue, till a distinct clarity is brought about.
-
Gadafi must stay, just like saddam should have stayed. Let them kill eachother. There is no need for western imperialists to interfere when muslims are killing eachother.
-
The only error NATO is making is the bombing and that, in reality, it would be better to allow the rebels and Qaddafi kill each other...even if Qaddafi had won without NATO interference, it would be better to keep an eye on him if he started building nukes, AND THEN, bomb him.
-
This is sickening, so our troops are helping Al-Queda win.