JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: muman613 on November 06, 2011, 06:10:50 PM
-
Well it seems that our feeling that Yigal Amir was not the true murderer of Rabin may just have some truth. It looks like Rabin may have been shot in the front {Amir allegedly shot Rabin from the rear} while he was in the car. If this is true, and there is forensic evidence that it is, then the entire 'official version' of the story can be called into question. I have tried to remain impartial in determining what happened that night.... But as more evidence comes out I feel that there is more to the story than the 'official version' of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt1aiZd1OME
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149444#.TrcS3Z137WA
Public Committee: 'Find Rabin's Second Shooter'
Was Rabin's assassination an ISA plot? The Committee for the Reinvestigation of the Rabin Murder presents evidence which suggests that.
Elad Benari & Yoni Kempinski
It has been 16 years since the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin on November 4, 1995, after a peace rally in Tel Aviv.
Yigal Amir was convicted and imprisoned for the murder, but 16 years later many questions still remain about whether Amir is truly Rabin’s killer. The Public Committee for the Reinvestigation of the Rabin Murder, which met on Thursday, is calling for a government inquiry into finding the true killer.
[youtube:125619]
Yaakov Verker, who heads the commission, told Arutz Sheva that there is strong evidence that shows that Rabin was not killed by the shots fired by Amir, which hit him in the back, but rather by an additional shot fired at him from the front when he was already in his vehicle.
“There’s a big blood stain inside the car,” Verker said. “I got a very important document about it from a person who sent an e-mail after several years, when he understood that the blood stain could not have belonged to Rabin’s bodyguard [who was wounded in the shooting -ed.] but to another person who sat there and was murdered in the car [suggesting that it was Rabin’s murderer who was himself later shot and killed –ed.]. There was also a big blood stain in the back seat, where Rabin sat, because Rabin sat in the car.”
Alex Peleg, a forensic expert, reinforced Verker’s claims and said, “There was an additional shot fired from the front that was not fired by Amir. Not in the chest, but on the left seven centimeters below. Who fired that shot? Yigal Amir couldn’t have fired it. There was a second shooter. When I investigated these things and asked the forensic department to investigate the shooting range, they answered that a murder from ten years ago is not checked. A strange answer, considering we are speaking about a Prime Minister.”
Verker said that he believes that in light of the evidence, the murder was a plot by the Israel Security Agency (ISA) and that Amir, in fact, had fired blanks.
“I believe that Yigal Amir fired blanks because it was a plot by the ISA,” he said. “Why didn’t they shoot Amir? A man fires three shots and no one shoots him?”
Verker said he had spoken with Rabin’s children as well with Yigal Amir’s brother, and that “they all know that the murder took place in the car, and it’s infuriating because they never solved the mystery of who the murderer is. The murderer was killed that same night. They buried him at 3:00 a.m. There’s a testimony of a gravedigger who took part in a hurried burial at 3:00 a.m.”
-
I think it was one his bodyguards whose last name was Rubin
-
Amir himself has never denied that he killed Rabin. Sorry but this sounds too much like people saying OJ Simpson was innocent. You throw out anonymous quotes, vague assumptions, quote an expert here and there and you are doing nothing more than OJ Simpson's followers did.
-
Amir himself has never denied that he killed Rabin. Sorry but this sounds too much like people saying OJ Simpson was innocent. You throw out anonymous quotes, vague assumptions, quote an expert here and there and you are doing nothing more than OJ Simpson's followers did.
Ah yes, then there is the fact that Amir was played as a patsy by the intelligence service, even giving him the gun... Learn a little about the claims and it is possible to see that there may be truth there.
-
Whether Amir killed him or not is irrelevant for us. The question is was/would it be the correct course of action to kill him. You know what the answer is.
-
Amir may or may not have killed Rabin, but he certainly tried.
And Amir is a heroic Jew who should be freed.
It IS true that Rabin was shot once from the front. That bullet did not come from Amir. So when and where did it happen? That is a legitimate question and does not require cherry picking any quotes or throwing out strange assumptions. It's in the medical records, he was shot once from the front. ( to the chest or lower).
-
Amir himself has never denied that he killed Rabin. Sorry but this sounds too much like people saying OJ Simpson was innocent. You throw out anonymous quotes, vague assumptions, quote an expert here and there and you are doing nothing more than OJ Simpson's followers did.
So you compare Yigal to that Negro animal?
-
So you compare Yigal to that Negro animal?
I don't think that's what he meant! (chas veshalom)
-
So you compare Yigal to that Negro animal?
Are you asking that seriously?
-
Must be a language barrier. There was one guy who used to flip a lid whenever I suggested that. lol. But seriously I don't know how comparing him with OJ can be gleaned from your original comment.