JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: angryChineseKahanist on December 07, 2013, 02:44:44 AM
-
Ted the wetback phony exposes himself again.
The first time was when he was praising commie obongo. now hes praising commie mandela.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ted-cruz-praise-nelson-mandela-criticized-article-1.1539686
-
Everybody left, right, and center is praising Mandela the butcher.
But, show me where Cruz praised Osama.
-
Has Ted Cruz sold out?
-
http://bit.ly/1bpSgh6
-
Everybody left, right, and center is praising Mandela the butcher.
One relatively speaking ray of light in the sea of darkness is the article that Joseph Farah wrote:
.................................................
http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/dont-mourn-for-mandela/
BETWEEN THE LINES
Don't mourn for Mandela
Exclusive: Joseph Farah says man 'wasn't the saintly character portrayed by Morgan Freeman'
Published: 2 days ago
The whole world, pretty much, is mourning for Nelson Mandela today.
But most are not mourning for the real Mandela. They are, in fact, mourning for the myth of Mandela.
He was not Martin Luther King Jr. He was not Mahatma Gandhi. And he was certainly not George Washington, as Barack Obama claimed.
He was a committed member of the South African Communist Party. He was a leader of the revolutionary African National Congress, which he helped to radicalize into an organization sworn to armed, violent attacks.
Maybe you say: “But Farah, he was fighting against the evil of Apartheid!”
Yes, that is true. Apartheid was inarguably an evil and unjustifiable system. But so is the system Mandela’s revolution brought about – one in which anti-white racism is so strong today that a prominent genocide watchdog group has labeled the current situation a “precursor” to the deliberate, systematic elimination of the race.
In other words, the world has been sold a bill of goods about Mandela. He wasn’t the saintly character portrayed by Morgan Freeman. He wasn’t someone fighting for racial equality. He was the leader of a violent, Communist revolution that has nearly succeeded in all of its grisly horror.
But don’t believe me.
I’ve never been to South Africa – not during Apartheid and not after.
Instead, listen to Sonia Hruska. She was an early supporter of Mandela and worked in his administration.
“After about six years,” Hruska said, “I realized something serious is wrong; the communist elements are taking over, it’s not what we were promised.”
What did she see that the rest of the world missed?
“As a business owner, I can get 25 years in jail time if I do employ a white person, for instance,” she said. “It is totally ridiculous; you cannot have imagined that affirmative action could have gone so far.”
Today, in South Africa’s white population of 4 million, 1 million live in utter poverty.
Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
Hruska describes routine, violent, racist atrocities of almost unimaginable proportions: Kidnap murders, home invasions, gang rapes.
“It’s heinous torture,” Hruska explained. “Even children as young as 2 months old get burned with hot water, get wrapped in newspaper and burned.”
In the case of one family, Hruska described a black mob breaking into a home, waiting for the white family to get home, then raping the mother in front of the father and son to see. Then, after killing the mother, they killed the father and son by plunging them into boiling water.
She said: “There is no easy way of saying exactly how these people are tortured. The standard would be a hot iron, electric iron, boiling water … and these are carried out for hours.”
You will read today many stories describing Mandela as a “political prisoner.”
In fact, he served 27 years in prison for 23 specific acts of sabotage and attempting to overthrow the government.
It was only a year ago that some of the international press began to report the truth about Mandela for the first time. Last December, the London Telegraph reported that, indeed, the records showed Mandela was not only a member of the South African Communist Party, he held a “senior rank.”
By the way, Mandela was offered his freedom while incarcerated many times. All he had to do was renounce terrorism. He wouldn’t do it.
Of course, it’s fashionable to forget about all of this today. Nelson Mandela is dead. He is being proclaimed a saint all over the world.
Nevertheless, these inconvenient truths need to be stated by someone because the Mandela mythology is as dangerous as the terror he and his followers perpetrated on so many innocent victims – white and black.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/dont-mourn-for-mandela/#iAofwUO3zHjkaSXr.99
-
errr:
""He was not Martin Luther King Jr. He was not Mahatma Gandhi. And he was certainly not George Washington, as Barack Obama claimed.""
monkey mandela was a commie just like martin Lucifer Koon was and just like gandhi was a commie. obongo is also a commie.
-
That's part of why I wrote relatively speaking.
-
Does everyone really know how bad Mandela was... I just knew he was bad from JTF, I didn't know how bad.
-
Does everyone really know how bad Mandela was... I just knew he was bad from JTF, I didn't know how bad.
I heard he contributed to the decline of South Africa. Other than that I know nothing about him.
-
Does everyone really know how bad Mandela was... I just knew he was bad from JTF, I didn't know how bad.
Sadly, most people don't know the truth about this beast.
Chaim and JTF put together a great article about Nelson Mandela back in 1998:
http://jtf.org/israel/israel.black.nazi.nelson.mandela.htm
-
Sorry, what I meant by "everyone" was Ted Cruz, ect.
-
Sadly, most people don't know the truth about this beast.
Chaim and JTF put together a great article about Nelson Mandela back in 1998:
http://jtf.org/israel/israel.black.nazi.nelson.mandela.htm
And yet white people loved him.
-
Gandhi lived in South Africa which is where he adopted his ideology from the black Nazi ANC. Ganhdi was a self-hating Indian.
-
I edited the thread title. It reflects poorly on us if we say that we support Ted Cruz and then use racist slang and terms against him when we disagree with him over a minor issue. Nelson Mandela's death was inevitable. It's just a shame that he didn't die while he was in prison.
I don't think this selective outrage helps us. Although I agree that nobody that claims to be a conservative should be offering words of praise, admiration and adoration over the death of this piece of sub-human garbage.
-
I edited the thread title. It reflects poorly on us if we say that we support Ted Cruz and then use racist slang and terms against him when we disagree with him over a minor issue. Nelson Mandela's death was inevitable. It's just a shame that he didn't die while he was in prison.
I don't think this selective outrage helps us. Although I agree that nobody that claims to be a conservative should be offering words of praise, admiration and adoration over the death of this piece of sub-human garbage.
I still strongly support Ted Cruz. However, his comments about Nelson Mandela illustrate the importance of JTF becoming a mass movement. Cruz and other Conservatives praising Mandela need to hear the truth about Mandela. Thankfully, many of Cruz's non JTF supporters understand at least some of the reasons why Mandela should be verbally ripped to pieces instead of praised.
-
I still strongly support Ted Cruz. However, his comments about Nelson Mandela illustrate the importance of JTF becoming a mass movement. Cruz and other Conservatives praising Mandela need to hear the truth about Mandela. Thankfully, many of Cruz's non JTF supporters understand at least some of the reasons why Mandela should be verbally ripped to pieces instead of praised.
They know the truth about Mandela as much as any of us.. The difference is that they will bow to public pressure and appease the enemies of truth and reason, because they are first and foremost "Politicians". Power, prestige and money means more to them than truth, righteousness and dignity. The latter virtues always come second to being "politically correct" and accepted and respected by public opinion, even if what you support is unethical and wrong.
Show me a man who is not afraid to make enemies and is willing to be ostracized by the public and not be a media fanboy. There was a man like this who lived once, his name was Meir Kahane and he was murdered by his own people. I would have voted for this man, but really I do not feel like voting for any of these other smiley two-faced, half-ass frauds. Once they get into the Oval Office, most of their dignity and honor is out the window.
There was a time where Binyamin Netanyahu could have got my respect. But once he tasted the power, the fame and fortune that became much more essential than being a champion of what is right and honorable.
-
They know the truth about Mandela as much as any of us.. The difference is that they will bow to public pressure and appease the enemies of truth and reason, because they are first and foremost "Politicians". Power, prestige and money means more to them than truth, righteousness and dignity. The latter virtues always come second to being "politically correct" and accepted and respected by public opinion, even if what you support is unethical and wrong.
Show me a man who is not afraid to make enemies and is willing to be ostracized by the public and not be a media fanboy. There was a man like this who lived once, his name was Meir Kahane and he was murdered by his own people. I would have voted for this man, but really I do not feel like voting for any of these other smiley two-faced, half-ass frauds. Once they get into the Oval Office, most of their dignity and honor is out the window.
There was a time where Binyamin Netanyahu could have got my respect. But once he tasted the power, the fame and fortune that became much more essential than being a champion of what is right and honorable.
My guess is Ted Cruz truly wasn't aware of a large portion of Mandela's history. If Cruz knew as much about Mandela as some of his supporters, at the very least I think he would have stayed silent regarding Mandela's death instead of praising him. Cruz has taken positions that are very unpopular even in his own party, when he had very little support amongst his fellow Senators.
-
EveryJewA44, my ' Ask JTF' question to Chaim relates specifically to our discussion. You raised some great points in general. Yet, I'm interested in Chaim's opinion specifically regarding Ted Cruz. It's something I think we should address in the present instead of pretending that Cruz didn't make the comments about Nelson Mandela that he did.
-
Look at Apple homepage.
-
:usa+israel: :fist:
In this maddening age of political correctness, we must persist in enlightening these "conservatives" on
issues such as this. eb22 is correct in continuing his support for Ted Cruz as he is currently the best
"right-wing" candidate on the horizon and is excellent on many issues. There are surely issues
that we might not even concur with the great Mike Huckabee on, maybe we should weigh the pros and
cons.
-
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/09/politics/cruz-mandela-trip/index.html?hpt=po_c1
There's a line somewhere. Remember how awesome West/Palin sounded?
-
EveryJewA44, I heard Chaim's answer on the most recent ' Ask JTF' program and in essence he agreed with you. After seeing at least one other person ( Rev. MP. Kenneth Meshoe ) with good positions also praise Nelson Mandela this week, I'm now of the opinion that you and Chaim are correct about your assessment.
I'll still continue to support Ted Cruz in the U.S. Senate and he could easily be our best option come the 2016 Presidential Election. But the unfortunate reality is something Chaim touched on: Cruz isn't going to run on a Kahanist platform.
-
:usa+israel: :fist:
In this maddening age of political correctness, we must persist in enlightening these "conservatives" on
issues such as this. eb22 is correct in continuing his support for Ted Cruz as he is currently the best
"right-wing" candidate on the horizon and is excellent on many issues. There are surely issues
that we might not even concur with the great Mike Huckabee on, maybe we should weigh the pros and
cons.
Nachus, interesting Mike Huckabee mentioned this week that he's considering running for President in 2016. In the upcoming ' Ask JTF' program, I asked Chaim who his choice would be if both Huckabee and Ted Cruz ran. The following is a link to the story regarding Huckabee's possible Presidential Bid in 2016:
http://www.fox51.com/news/mike-huckabee-mulls-2016-meets-iowa-sc-groups
-
EveryJewA44, I heard Chaim's answer on the most recent ' Ask JTF' program and in essence he agreed with you. After seeing at least one other person ( Rev. MP. Kenneth Meshoe ) with good positions also praise Nelson Mandela this week, I'm now of the opinion that you and Chaim are correct about your assessment.
I'll still continue to support Ted Cruz in the U.S. Senate and he could easily be our best option come the 2016 Presidential Election. But the unfortunate reality is something Chaim touched on: Cruz isn't going to run on a Kahanist platform.
I think he did it, because he's going to run... If he went against Mandela, the whole brainwashed world would of turned against him. Even the right, because most of them don't know the truth either.
-
I think he did it, because he's going to run... If he went against Mandela, the whole brainwashed world would of turned against him. Even the right, because most of them don't know the truth either.
The impression I'm getting is the grassroots people are expressing much more about the truth about Nelson Mandela than the vast majority of Republicans and Conservatives that have major influence. Newt Gingrich, who is well educated practically anyone and displayed much more courage than most politicians have, even praised Nelson Mandela. Gingrich took the easy way out this time around:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/12/ted-cruz-newt-gingrich-defend-mandela-against-gop-critics/
-
From the title of this thread I am led to believe that Mr Cruz pulled a 'weiner' and sent naked pictures of himself to women?
I hope it is just me...
-
From the title of this thread I am led to believe that Mr Cruz pulled a 'weiner' and sent naked pictures of himself to women?
I hope it is just me...
... :-X