JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Ben Yehuda on January 10, 2014, 08:27:57 AM

Title: Who would be worse as POTUS?
Post by: Ben Yehuda on January 10, 2014, 08:27:57 AM

Not a great choice- I know.

Title: Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
Post by: angryChineseKahanist on January 10, 2014, 08:31:23 AM

A what?

If you mean president, then Hillary would be worst.
A pseudo communist or a fat opportunist?

Title: Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
Post by: GreenLightToGo on January 10, 2014, 09:11:18 AM

I voted for Clinton as the worst of the two, but Christie is still bad.

Fox desperately wants Christie to run in 2016. They continue to promote him as a "potential 2016 presidential candidate" even though Christie consistently denies having any interest in that.

Fox hates Ted Cruz among other conservatives so much that they'll continue to promote a candidate for 2016 with no intention of running.

Title: Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
Post by: NoMosqueHere on January 10, 2014, 10:14:28 AM

I don't think H will run; she looks old and very tired to me.  And, for democrats the problem may be: once you have black, you never go back.  That old black magic got them in its spell....watch out for cory booker or the black governor of massachusetts.

Title: Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
Post by: Daniel on January 11, 2014, 03:06:55 PM

Hillary is pro-union while Christie is staunchly anti-union. So I would think that most of you would prefer Christie.