Question of the day. Before the no fault divorce laws you did have some men who were not good husbands and weren't around and didn't divorce their wife. Benjamin Franklin despite the much good he did wasn't the best husband once his first son passed away due to disease and was never around for his wife and his wife was very unhappy about this. (Franklin was one of the more Liberal founders but today he would be a right wing extremist of course.)
Although they did allow divorce after hearing (I would assume) from all sides. Although being 33, I don't really know what happened before no fault divorce. But having a 50% divorce rate is obviosly really bad and is harming children, is harming fahters, and also in the end are harming mothers as some women who are brainwashed into getting divorced later on have regrets. SO could we hear some comments on this since I am only 33 but certainlly the system before no fault divorce as imperfect as it may have been had to be better then the current system which g-d forbid could end g-d up destroying this country as children need fathers and mothers and have serious social problems growing up without a father.
Also, I do know 2 out of every 3 divorces are initiated by women and to get child support and alimony for "no fault" from the father to me is stealing. American men today are no different then infidels in Muslim countries in which Muslims can steal from the infidels. In America it is OK for women to steal from men.