בס''ד
In this article that he wrote for the Jerusalem Post (a traitor newspaper that was originally called the "Palestine Post" before changing its name), Texas Governor Rick Perry outlines his positions on Israel.
Perry absurdly speaks of "Palestinians" - a people that has never existed and was invented solely as a propaganda myth to destroy Israel. Perry speaks of the need for negotiations for "peace" - which means that tiny Israel should negotiate with the Arab Nazis who seek her destruction. Perry says the U.S. has an interest in developing "Palestinian" institutions and society - which means U.S. foreign aid to the PLO-Fatah terrorist mass murderers who seek the annihilation of America and Israel. Perry also implies that he supports a "two state" solution - which would be national suicide for Israel.
This is all "politically correct" garbage but unfortunately there are no Jews other than JTF who would say this to Perry.
On the other hand, Perry attacks Barack Hussein Obama for pressuring Israel on settlements and other issues. Perry also basically adopts the positions of the Netanyahu regime in Israel because he thinks that is pro-Israel. So that could mean that Perry will at least not pressure Israel to commit suicide if he becomes president. If Perry does not pressure Israel, including no pressure on the settlements issue, that would be much better than what we have now. If Perry also does not pressure Israel not to militarily destroy Iran's nuclear bomb-making program, then that could prevent another holocaust.
So I still think that Perry is our best bet, even though I am not happy with much of what he says on this issue.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=238144For more clarity on Perry's positions, he gave the following answer in an interview in this week's Time Magazine:
Time magazine: "Do you believe there should be a Palestinian state?"
Perry: "I certainly have some concerns. The first step in any peaceful negotiation for a two-state solution for the Palestinians is to recognize the right of Israel’s existence. They have to denounce terrorism in both word and deed. And they have to sit down and negotiate with Israel directly. Anything short of that is a non-starter in my opinion."
Here again Perry is taking the position of the Israeli government, perhaps because he feels that is pro-Israel. If Perry did that as president, that would mean no pressure on Israel. Then we would still have to worry about the traitor leaders of Israel pushing a suicidal agenda, but at least there would be no American pressure. Of course, it is quite possible that Perry is lying and that he will pressure Israel when he becomes president. His campaign rhetoric may be what politicians frequently do - they make promises that are quickly broken when they take office. But
if Perry doesn't pressure Israel, it would be an improvement.
Here's the full Time magazine interview:
http://swampland.time.com/2011/09/15/rick-perry-exclusive-the-gops-fiery-front-runner-on-his-rise-record-and-rhetoric/?iid=sl-main-lede
Topic: Perry explains Israel position - both good and bad (Read 1353 times)