Nobody ever said it was not an accident. Driving without a license is okay? It tells me that he is much more of a common criminal than a hero we should be tying our reputations to. He was the one in the oncoming traffic lane. A decent person with respect for the law does not drive without a license let alone drive recklessly without a license with his family in the car. Let's also not forget that when he was first arrested he claimed that he murdered the Arabs because he was despondent over his girlfriend dumping him. Later he changed his story to rage over being raped by Arabs. I just don't see why anyone would consider him a hero.
I have no idea why he chose to slay the enemy, nor do I care.
Could it be that the reason he had no license is because he wasn't allowed to have one after his experience of hurting arabs and then spending time in jail for it? I just don't get the relevance of his having a license or not. It didn't make the accident any more or less likely.
And when you assume he drove recklessly, you are assuming the worst about him. How do you know he drove recklessly? Because the media said so?
You say nobody said it wasn't an accident but at the same time you assume he purposely drove recklessly with his family in the car - you are contradicting yourself. In the same way, your initial comment did the same thing. You blamed him for crashing during a furlough and getting his family killed, but then you act shocked when I interpret that you are suggesting it wasn't an accident.
And I have met people who believe stupid things about this matter. He has been made into a villain. And for obvious reasons.