Hello friends, and good day to you all.
As I pointed out in the beginning, the type of acerbic language in the emails I used is not something I recommend, and certainly not anything you should use when discussing and debating issues with honest folks who may or may not agree. My email was in direct response (retaliation) to an extremely unfair, dishonest, and downright libelous article from a writer I'm completely convinced had no intention of writing an accurate piece about Chaim Ben Pesach and the Jewish Task Force, nor of even learning what the organization stands for. She could certainly disagree, and even negatively spin her editorial all in good taste, but what she did was utilize the lowest form of journalism to slime a man she never spoke to. The out-and-out lies, fabrications, and Hitleresque call for the end of the program is what triggered the tone of my letter -- not her disagreement with JTF's positions.
I invite you all to write to her using softer tones if you wish, Scriabin's letter is a great example. Whatever you feel is best.