Poll

Should anti-gun politicians be entitled to armed protection?

Yes. They are our betters and entitled to what they deny us.
0 (0%)
No. They should only be entitled to what they allow us.
11 (100%)

Total Members Voted: 0

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.  (Read 2850 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

newman

  • Guest
Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« on: November 12, 2007, 03:06:30 PM »
According to liberal politicians 'ordinary' Americans can't have firearms for the purpose of self-defense. Yet these same people enjoy round the clock, taxpayer-funded, armed bodyguards. Is this not the height of "do as we say, not as we do" hypocracy?
Logged

Offline Sarah

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3341
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2007, 03:17:40 PM »
It is extremely hypocritical!

It is like  the secretary of state for the environment, went to demonstrations demanding the prevention of global warming, in a 4X4 polluting monster.
Logged

newman

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2007, 03:26:02 PM »
Quote from: Sarah on November 12, 2007, 03:17:40 PM
It is extremely hypocritical!

It is like  the secretary of state for the environment, went to demonstrations demanding the prevention of global warming, in a 4X4 polluting monster.

Hollywood is also famouse for anti-gun, envronmental activists in 10 MPG 4X4s with Glock 9mm guns in the glove box!
Logged

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12593
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2007, 03:26:40 PM »
thts a no brainer
Logged
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

kellymaureen

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2007, 03:28:18 PM »
Nope, but they can feel free to "negociate with" or "debate" their attackers O0
Logged

Offline RationalThought110

  • Moderator
  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 4813
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2007, 03:30:04 PM »
On a related note, I think I heard last week on the news that Jessica Simpson had members of the national guard protecting her.  Why?
Logged

newman

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2007, 03:31:35 PM »
Quote from: kellymaureen on November 12, 2007, 03:28:18 PM
Nope, but they can feel free to "negociate with" or "debate" their attackers O0

You mean trying to counsel a bunch of rapists about their underprivillaged upbringing won't work???

I'm shocked!! :o
Logged

kellymaureen

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2007, 03:50:11 PM »
Quote from: RationalThought110 on November 12, 2007, 03:30:04 PM
On a related note, I think I heard last week on the news that Jessica Simpson had members of the national guard protecting her.  Why?

The guard said it was for "crowd control" purposes, said the airline asked them to do it, the airline said they made no such request...they said they did it to 'free up security personal' for more important duties...who knows why, maybe they wanted her autograph, but then she would have had to figure out how to spell her name and all that ::)

Speaking of national guard...where has Wayne been, havent seen him around in a while
« Last Edit: November 12, 2007, 03:51:53 PM by kellymaureen »
Logged

Offline HiWarp

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1867
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2007, 04:21:00 PM »
Quote from: kellymaureen on November 12, 2007, 03:28:18 PM
Nope, but they can feel free to "negociate with" or "debate" their attackers O0

Or do what they want everyone else to do...call the police and wait 10-15 minutes for them to arrive.
Logged
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny;
when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
---Thomas Jefferson

newman

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2007, 04:23:06 PM »
Quote from: HiWarp on November 12, 2007, 04:21:00 PM
Quote from: kellymaureen on November 12, 2007, 03:28:18 PM
Nope, but they can feel free to "negociate with" or "debate" their attackers O0

Or do what they want everyone else to do...call the police and wait 10-15 minutes for them to arrive.

10 or 15?????? where do you live?

Try an hour PLUS!!!!!!!
Logged

Offline HiWarp

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1867
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2007, 04:28:20 PM »
Quote from: newman on November 12, 2007, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: HiWarp on November 12, 2007, 04:21:00 PM
Quote from: kellymaureen on November 12, 2007, 03:28:18 PM
Nope, but they can feel free to "negociate with" or "debate" their attackers O0

Or do what they want everyone else to do...call the police and wait 10-15 minutes for them to arrive.

10 or 15?????? where do you live?

Try an hour PLUS!!!!!!!

Well now, you've hit in right on the head.  In New York it may well be 10 -15 minutes.  What the pols who say this don't consider is people who live in rural areas.  For them, ONE HOUR is a short time to wait.
Logged
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny;
when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
---Thomas Jefferson

Offline Sarah

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3341
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2007, 05:19:20 PM »
Quote from: newman on November 12, 2007, 04:23:06 PM
Quote from: HiWarp on November 12, 2007, 04:21:00 PM
Quote from: kellymaureen on November 12, 2007, 03:28:18 PM
Nope, but they can feel free to "negociate with" or "debate" their attackers O0

Or do what they want everyone else to do...call the police and wait 10-15 minutes for them to arrive.

10 or 15?????? where do you live?

Try an hour PLUS!!!!!!!

You might as well murder yourself before the attacker does. Thats crazy AN HOUR!?!?!?!?!?!

If, thats the case i'm for Guns.
Logged

kellymaureen

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2007, 05:36:49 PM »


The police will show up to take pictures of the body....it wont be MY body if i can help it ^-^
Logged

newman

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2007, 05:42:00 PM »
Quote from: kellymaureen on November 12, 2007, 05:36:49 PM


The police will show up to take pictures of the body....it wont be MY body if i can help it ^-^

The police cannot protect you or your home anymore than they can drive you safely on the highway. Safety and protection are more than rights, they are personal responsibilities!

Call 911?

Better to cal .357 or 9X19!
Logged

Offline Sarah

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3341
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2007, 05:47:57 PM »
The police kill a lot of people by speeding as well. There was a case recently, where a policeman was doing 70mph on his motorbike on a countryland and crashed into a cyclist who flew of his bike and landed on a jagged fence, which skewered him. It turned out the policeman, was just returing back to his station for tea.
Logged

newman

  • Guest
Re: Poll: Anti-gun politicians with taxpayer funded armed protection.
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2007, 05:52:01 PM »
Quote from: Sarah on November 12, 2007, 05:47:57 PM
The police kill a lot of people by speeding as well. There was a case recently, where a policeman was doing 70mph on his motorbike on a countryland and crashed into a cyclist who flew of his bike and landed on a jagged fence, which skewered him. It turned out the policeman, was just returing back to his station for tea.

They are a law unto themselves. They can speed , we can't. They have guns, we can't.

 Yet policemen get divorced, drink, suffer from stress same as us. Can anti-gun idiots explain why cops don't all shoot their neighbours?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »