Raulmarrio2000 is a troll!

[Raulmarrio2000]

Falashas is a derogatory term for Ethiopian Jews. The Ethiopian goyim called them that. It comes from Falash Mura and I think is equivalent to The Spanish calling "New Christians" Marranos. White Jews get the term confused and call all Ethiopian Jews Falashas which is wrong.

Falasha means "Foreigner/ Exiled" in Amaric. I thought Ethipian Jews used the term with pride, because it remembers their hope to return. But I just don't know.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

From what I have seen he has very weird views, but I am not ready to call him a troll. He is just... weird.

However--as an Argentine, he is severely mixed-up and even self-hating. Argentina is (was, before Peronism) a FIRST WORLD country founded by Europeans just like South Africa used to be. Argentina was the lone bastion of civilization on a Third World continent for many years.

Raul, how can you universally support indigenous peoples (even when they are wrong) and be an Argentine, which by definition means you are a white European?

[Dr. Dan]

A troll is someone who posts stuff purposely to rile up a forum, and doesn't really believe in what they post.  They purposely cause division.  That's the definition.

by that definition, what about a "devils advocate".  I tend to pull this off once in awhile.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

And also--even though I don't agree with a lot of Raul's opinions, I want to know why everyone is up in arms over him but all kissed up to Erica's crack-addicted ass. Myself and DownwithIslam were pretty much the only people here who stood up to that gutterwhore.

[Dr. Dan]

I agree with CF..took the words right out of my mouth.

[Raulmarrio2000]

Raul, how can you universally support indigenous peoples (even when they are wrong) and be an Argentine, which by definition means you are a white European?

I was born here. I have also Italian cirizenship. And Yes, I am white. But I claim we have no right to the Natives lands. No matter if some natives may be wrong, it's their Land. We must not steal.
However not all the American continent was inhabitted when European came here. The great problem is that conquerors did not want to build new nation on the non-inhabited areas, which would have been correct. They just conquered Indians cities to steal their gold.
Here in Argentina, most native did not even had the concept of State or kingdom. In this province they were mostly nomads. It was not evil that some Europeans built cities, it was no invasion in itself. But they stole from natives, and then entrapped then into States which are not natives'.
Even today they destroy the places the natives live in, they expell them, detroy the forest and use their land for agriculture. That's stealing.
Last Wednesday Greenpeace could persuade the Congress to forbid destroying forest and native areas

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Raul, I agree with some of your POV, and furthermore would like to see the forest protected from development also, but simply being indigenous does not make you right. In the United States, some of the American Indians were friendly, and some were savage. They were not ALL noble. Yes, I do agree that they were mistreated (far more than the blacks ever were for sure) overall, but not all of them were nice people. Surely the same is true in Argentina and Latin America.

Are the blacks in South Africa good and righteous people? Hardly. These are beasts that believe raping a virgin cures AIDS, after all.

[Vito]

Raul, how can you universally support indigenous peoples (even when they are wrong) and be an Argentine, which by definition means you are a white European?

I was born here. I have also Italian cirizenship. And Yes, I am white. But I claim we have no right to the Natives lands. No matter if some natives may be wrong, it's their Land. We must not steal.
However not all the American continent was inhabitted when European came here. The great problem is that conquerors did not want to build new nation on the non-inhabited areas, which would have been correct. They just conquered Indians cities to steal their gold.
Here in Argentina, most native did not even had the concept of State or kingdom. In this province they were mostly nomads. It was not evil that some Europeans built cities, it was no invasion in itself. But they stole from natives, and then entrapped then into States which are not natives'.
Even today they destroy the places the natives live in, they expell them, detroy the forest and use their land for agriculture. That's stealing.
Last Wednesday Greenpeace could persuade the Congress to forbid destroying forest and native areas

Raul, sei Italiano?

[Raulmarrio2000]

Yes, mu grandfarher came here in 1907 and refused Argentinian citizenship. So he died here being Italian and foreign resident in Argentina. According to Italian Law, I could get the citizenship. The rest of my mother's family were all Italian also, but they may have resigned citizenship before 1948, and so have no rights. My mother wished to get the citizenship when she was already very ill and died before the documents were ready.
I continued the process and got it, but never cared to learn the language. Anyway my grandfather never spoke Italian, but a dialect from Cerdegne Island which now linguists consider to be not properly Italian but a separate language.

[Ambiorix]

I was born here. I have also Italian cirizenship. And Yes, I am white. But I claim we have no right to the Natives lands. No matter if some natives may be wrong, it's their Land. We must not steal.
However not all the American continent was inhabitted when European came here. The great problem is that conquerors did not want to build new nation on the non-inhabited areas, which would have been correct. They just conquered Indians cities to steal their gold.
Here in Argentina, most native did not even had the concept of State or kingdom. In this province they were mostly nomads. It was not evil that some Europeans built cities, it was no invasion in itself. But they stole from natives, and then entrapped then into States which are not natives'.
Even today they destroy the places the natives live in, they expell them, detroy the forest and use their land for agriculture. That's stealing.
Last Wednesday Greenpeace could persuade the Congress to forbid destroying forest and native areas

Raul,
would you agree on this:
Let the non-whites/mixed coloured in America/Australia/SAfr., and bring all the whites back to their countries in Europe?

[Raulmarrio2000]

Raul, I agree with some of your POV, and furthermore would like to see the forest protected from development also, but simply being indigenous does not make you right. In the United States, some of the American Indians were friendly, and some were savage. They were not ALL noble. Yes, I do agree that they were mistreated (far more than the blacks ever were for sure) overall, but not all of them were nice people. Surely the same is true in Argentina and Latin America.

Are the blacks in South Africa good and righteous people? Hardly. These are beasts that believe raping a virgin cures AIDS, after all.

I didn't say that all natives are righteous. I only say that we must not steal from any one whether righteous or wicked. Of course there may be wicked natives, they are humans with free will and they can choose evil.
Europeans are also native in Europe and being natives did not prevnt them from coming here to conquer and even rape Amerindians.
Africa is the land of several black nations (except the north wich belongs to white nations conquered by Arabs invasions). Now if Boers discovered some non inhabited areas in South Africa, as someone has said, then they do well in claiming it. No Nation or ethnic group can claim a whole continent by just inhabitting a part of it. But the areas which were inhabitted by Blacks are theirs, no matter if you consider them righteous or not. If some natives do evil against their own berhren ( like the case you quote about some Blacks raping virgins) you are entitled to invade that land to punish the guilties and save the innocent, not to steal the land for yourself

[Iron Greek]

Ambiorix
that would be a disaster to europe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
because the white over here arent the same as the whites in europe!!!
the whites in america just arent the same
they will bring immorality to europe
because a big majority of the whites in america have become tainted by the minority bs that is going on
trust me
its like throwing a paralyzed man in a swimming pool and telling him to swim!!!
Or taking a wild dog and commanding him to sit or fetch
he will bite the living s--t out of you
and that would be what would happen to europe
and pluss Europe wouldnt want the whites from here anyway at least most of europe

[Raulmarrio2000]

I was born here. I have also Italian cirizenship. And Yes, I am white. But I claim we have no right to the Natives lands. No matter if some natives may be wrong, it's their Land. We must not steal.
However not all the American continent was inhabitted when European came here. The great problem is that conquerors did not want to build new nation on the non-inhabited areas, which would have been correct. They just conquered Indians cities to steal their gold.
Here in Argentina, most native did not even had the concept of State or kingdom. In this province they were mostly nomads. It was not evil that some Europeans built cities, it was no invasion in itself. But they stole from natives, and then entrapped then into States which are not natives'.
Even today they destroy the places the natives live in, they expell them, detroy the forest and use their land for agriculture. That's stealing.
Last Wednesday Greenpeace could persuade the Congress to forbid destroying forest and native areas

Raul,
would you agree on this:
Let the non-whites/mixed coloured in America/Australia/SAfr., and bring all the whites back to their countries in Europe?

No, first of all I say the native inhabitted areas in America (when I say america I mean the whole continent, not USA only) belong to Amerindians not to all non-whites. There's no need to expell Europeans who settled in the desert and made a Nation, and even if they left for Europe, most Amerondians are already decimated and it won't help them now. It's too late.
It would be better to offer the remaining Amerindians either soveregnty and a State in their land where they still live, or give them an active paricipation in the Govt. That solution I claim for Argentina. Just call the remaining tribal chiefs and offer them especial representation in the Govt. They cannot hold a State now, they are too few.
Secondly Europeans and any human will be taken back to their real homeland by Hashem in future. I consider myself Italian but Hashem may decide I am who knows what nationality. Gentiles are born gentiles by their mothers, and belong to the Gentile nation of his father following a patrilineal descent. Nobody knows the whole genealogy of each Gentile, except Hashem.

[Wayne Jude]

 

[Sarah]

You came back, what happened to you?

[Wayne Jude]

 

[Joe Schmo]

He's been getting thumbs up.

[Sarah]

Ambiorix
that would be a disaster to europe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
because the white over here arent the same as the whites in europe!!!
the whites in america just arent the same
they will bring immorality to europe
because a big majority of the whites in america have become tainted by the minority bs that is going on
trust me
its like throwing a paralyzed man in a swimming pool and telling him to swim!!!
Or taking a wild dog and commanding him to sit or fetch
he will bite the living s--t out of you
and that would be what would happen to europe
and pluss Europe wouldnt want the whites from here anyway at least most of europe

American whites as a whole are more moral than European whites.

Because they are more religious, then the secular europeans or just because they are better natured by upbringing?

[Wayne Jude]

 

[newman]

Ambiorix
that would be a disaster to europe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
because the white over here arent the same as the whites in europe!!!
the whites in america just arent the same
they will bring immorality to europe
because a big majority of the whites in america have become tainted by the minority bs that is going on
trust me
its like throwing a paralyzed man in a swimming pool and telling him to swim!!!
Or taking a wild dog and commanding him to sit or fetch
he will bite the living s--t out of you
and that would be what would happen to europe
and pluss Europe wouldnt want the whites from here anyway at least most of europe

American whites as a whole are more moral than European whites.

Because they are more religious, then the secular europeans or just because they are better natured by upbringing?

Sub-culture.

American culture is more religious or 'prudish' than european culture. America is also capitalist and believes is personal responsibility. Whereas Europe is socialist and believes in government being responsible for individuals.