Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea
Man
Kiwi:
--- Quote from: Dr. Dan on December 18, 2007, 10:49:52 PM ---
Wrong because human beings are incapable of being that shallow for billions of years.
--- End quote ---
Huh?
We have Shallow people everywhere.
Dr. Dan:
--- Quote from: The Infidel. on December 18, 2007, 11:14:35 PM ---
--- Quote from: Dr. Dan on December 18, 2007, 10:49:52 PM ---
Wrong because human beings are incapable of being that shallow for billions of years.
--- End quote ---
Huh?
We have Shallow people everywhere.
--- End quote ---
In order to have two human species as you called it..one with beautiful people and the other with ugly "goblins", you implied that all good looking people and all ugly people would have to consistently avoid each other and never mate..this would take billions of years....and for humanity to be that shallow for that long is impossible.
There are four fail safes here..
1. Most good looking people lack character.
2. Two ugly parents can give birth to a good looking child
3. Two good looking parents can give birth to an ugly child
4. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
Dr. Dan:
I'm sorry, but this is a really dumb racist thread...
Kiwi:
--- Quote from: Dr. Dan on December 18, 2007, 11:38:16 PM ---I'm sorry, but this is a really dumb racist thread...
--- End quote ---
The post is not racist, they just said two types of human, smart pretty ones, and others.
They mention no race. They are taking types of humans.
And genetically they are correct. Human in general choose the most health DNA they can find to breed with.
Does it insult you that from a science point of view humans are still within the animal speices.
We are governed by genetic imprinting, and should one be racist to flow that clearly is a natural part of our make up.
Must will go for the pretty girl first, why? Genetic imprinting.
Women fall well muscled men, why? Genetic imprinting.
Its the whole Nature/ Nurture debate.
Why people go for others that fall outside the normal? Well all kinds of reasons.
But many most people are swallow and well try for the Pretty and the handsome first.
MassuhDGoodName:
Re: "...Must will go for the pretty girl first, why? Genetic imprinting.
Women fall well muscled men, why? Genetic imprinting..."
This theory of genetic imprinting is flawed, and here's the reason:
What is considered "pretty" "feminine" "beautiful" in women, is not only culturally determined, but has varied greatly throughout history.
I have spent time in one foreign country in which a woman co-worker was strikingly beautiful.
The men of her country thought her to be completely undesirable; would scoff at the mention of her name and say "Only Americans think she is good looking."
There was a time not too long ago, when a woman was only considered feminine and desirable if she was quite buxom and full-figured.
I'm told by many that Arab men find fat women the most desirable.
The book 9 1/2 Mystics gives an account of an Lubavitcher wedding in New York, and states that "the best match" for a young man is a young woman with a hint of dark moustache on her upper lip.
As for "desirable DNA muscle men" being favored by women for breeding, I have yet to know of an extremely wealthy male, regardless of physique, that couldn't find the most beautiful women in the world throwing themselves at him.
To quote Henry Kissinger: "Power is the greatest aphrodisiac."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version