When I took the hunter safety course, they mentioned how the US army used to use .22 as standard ammunition, but the rounds would often pass right through the enemy without doing much damage. I'm familiar with the size of these shells as I've loaded them into clips before, but still would hate to have one of them go through me. Even if it didn't hit a vital organ. I'm guessing in most cases, shooting an attacker with one would fend them off, but I will plead ignorance since I only have limited knowledge of arms and ammunition.
I do have mixed feelings when it comes to gun control. I'm a strong believer in self defense and feel that we lack more heroes such as Bernhard Goetz(if someone knows how to invite him to this forum it would be great), yet I fear what would happen if every third world beast has a firearm. Many people are mentally ill, and I also know that too many people would be irresponsible with their firearms if everyone had one. There is also the class of people who are responsible with their firearms but use them to sadistically kill animals. It's one thing to kill animals for food, but many hunters kill purely for fun. Even when it is for food, the bible prohibits hunting of animals because they must be slaughtered in a humane fashion.
I personally hate using firearms and would normally choose the side of safety, but of course many third world beasts get a hold of them anyway while law abiding citizens cannot. Also in Nazi Germany, one of the first actions against Jews was to take their guns away. When the issue is whether to take away the rights of a everybody, because of a few bad people I'm against punishing the wrong people.
I'm really confused about what is right and what is wrong when it comes to gun control. One thing I have noticed is that most people making the laws have limited knowledge about firearms. Is "control" an appropiate word when the laws are made by people who are ignorant? I think "control" is important, but "control" means making the right decisions so the right people end up with to defense that they need.
How far do I differ from the Rav and JTF's position by expressing my confusion and mixed feelings over this issue?