No Islamic sharia law in Denmark

[Ambiorix]

http://sioe.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/sioe-demonstration-in-copenhagen/


 Like this……………………………..or like this???

 



The demonstration’s themes:

No Islamic veils in our Danish Parliament and courtrooms!

The veil represents misogyny and stands for patriarchally jealous and totalitarian Islamic male societies. The Koran sura 33.59: “O Prophet, tell your wives, your daughters and the believing women to draw their veils close to them, so it is likelier they will be known [as clean], and not hurt.”

No Islamic sharia law in Denmark

 

Slogans: -

- Stop new fascism (the new fascists are the ones that practise self-censorship and will stop other peoples freedom of speech and freedom to talk, draw and paint whatever one wishes.) -

- No sharia banking here

- Forbid halal-killing here

- No women’s discrimination here

- No racism here

- No discrimination of homosexuals here

- No discrimination of other religions here

- We’ll have our freedom back

Temporary list of speakers:

 Stephen Gash, SIOE England

 Eirik Devold, SIOE Norway

 Anders Gravers, SIOE Denmark

 You can still register to speak if you wish until May 16th

Future Denmark….




 

Permitted:

National flags, banners and signs etc. with the demonstration’s slogans.

Banned:

All totalitarian or racist signs, symbols, banners and signs

Interesting question : do we defend homosexuals against nazimuslims yes or no?

[MassuhDGoodName]

Ambiorix:  "...Interesting question : do we defend homosexuals against nazimuslims yes or no?..."

Hmmm!....

They wouldn't dare to be openly homosexual, were there no freedom.

I say NaziMuzzies are to be opposed without exception.

Homos are a societal problem, most certainly, but they don't threaten the immediate,  imminent, and murderous destruction of Western civilization, as does Islam.

Queers normally don't cut the throats of Christians and Jews, and they don't reproduce sexually.

Can't say the same about MuzzNazis, they breed out of control and murder, rape, and torture all non-Moslimes.

Defending queers against MuzzieNazis doesn't mean that you condone their practices; it simply means that they're your country's queers, and entitled to the same protection from murderous Muslimes as are all of your countrymen.

[Ben Yehuda]

Ambiorix:  "...Interesting question : do we defend homosexuals against nazimuslims yes or no?..."

Hmmm!....

They wouldn't dare to be openly homosexual, were there no freedom.

I say NaziMuzzies are to be opposed without exception.

Homos are a societal problem, most certainly, but they don't threaten the immediate,  imminent, and murderous destruction of Western civilization, as does Islam.

Queers normally don't cut the throats of Christians and Jews, and they don't reproduce sexually.

Can't say the same about MuzzNazis, they breed out of control and murder, rape, and torture all non-Moslimes.

Defending queers against MuzzieNazis doesn't mean that you condone their practices; it simply means that they're your country's queers, and entitled to the same protection from murderous Muslimes as are all of your countrymen.

I would have to agree. To me, no doubt, muslims and nazis are much more dangerous than homosexuals. Homosexuals, to me, although I do not condone their practices, do not threaten me. I am really not worried about being forcibly converted to  homosexuality or being killed by them.

[Ulli]

Ambiorix:  "...Interesting question : do we defend homosexuals against nazimuslims yes or no?..."

Hmmm!....

They wouldn't dare to be openly homosexual, were there no freedom.

I say NaziMuzzies are to be opposed without exception.

Homos are a societal problem, most certainly, but they don't threaten the immediate,  imminent, and murderous destruction of Western civilization, as does Islam.

Queers normally don't cut the throats of Christians and Jews, and they don't reproduce sexually.

Can't say the same about MuzzNazis, they breed out of control and murder, rape, and torture all non-Moslimes.

Defending queers against MuzzieNazis doesn't mean that you condone their practices; it simply means that they're your country's queers, and entitled to the same protection from murderous Muslimes as are all of your countrymen.

I would have to agree. To me, no doubt, muslims and nazis are much more dangerous than homosexuals. Homosexuals, to me, although I do not condone their practices, do not threaten me. I am really not worried about being forcibly converted to  homosexuality or being killed by them.

This is a different question. In Europe homosexuals sue religious people in order to press them to change their religious teachings. In the public schools has the homosexual-lobby a lot of influence.

In addition to that a lot of Muzzies are homosexuals.

Muzzies say openly, that they hate homosexuals, but privatly, they practice this abnomination.

Arab countries are for European homosexuals like the Pattaya for heterosexual immoral people.

[Ambiorix]

Ambiorix:  "...Interesting question : do we defend homosexuals against nazimuslims yes or no?..."

Hmmm!....

They wouldn't dare to be openly homosexual, were there no freedom.

I say NaziMuzzies are to be opposed without exception.

Homos are a societal problem, most certainly, but they don't threaten the immediate,  imminent, and murderous destruction of Western civilization, as does Islam.

Queers normally don't cut the throats of Christians and Jews, and they don't reproduce sexually.

Can't say the same about MuzzNazis, they breed out of control and murder, rape, and torture all non-Moslimes.

Defending queers against MuzzieNazis doesn't mean that you condone their practices; it simply means that they're your country's queers, and entitled to the same protection from murderous Muslimes as are all of your countrymen.

I would have to agree. To me, no doubt, muslims and nazis are much more dangerous than homosexuals. Homosexuals, to me, although I do not condone their practices, do not threaten me. I am really not worried about being forcibly converted to  homosexuality or being killed by them.

This is a different question. In Europe homosexuals sue religious people in order to press them to change their religious teachings. In the public schools has the homosexual-lobby a lot of influence.

In addition to that a lot of Muzzies are homosexuals.

Muzzies say openly, that they hate homosexuals, but privatly, they practice this abnomination.

Arab countries are for European homosexuals like the Pattaya for heterosexual immoral people.

Golden Pheasant makes a very clear statement.
Muzzies publicly declare they hate homos, but are the worst fags in the world.
Talk about takkkiah....

[Ulli]

Ambiorix:  "...Interesting question : do we defend homosexuals against nazimuslims yes or no?..."

Hmmm!....

They wouldn't dare to be openly homosexual, were there no freedom.

I say NaziMuzzies are to be opposed without exception.

Homos are a societal problem, most certainly, but they don't threaten the immediate,  imminent, and murderous destruction of Western civilization, as does Islam.

Queers normally don't cut the throats of Christians and Jews, and they don't reproduce sexually.

Can't say the same about MuzzNazis, they breed out of control and murder, rape, and torture all non-Moslimes.

Defending queers against MuzzieNazis doesn't mean that you condone their practices; it simply means that they're your country's queers, and entitled to the same protection from murderous Muslimes as are all of your countrymen.

I would have to agree. To me, no doubt, muslims and nazis are much more dangerous than homosexuals. Homosexuals, to me, although I do not condone their practices, do not threaten me. I am really not worried about being forcibly converted to  homosexuality or being killed by them.

This is a different question. In Europe homosexuals sue religious people in order to press them to change their religious teachings. In the public schools has the homosexual-lobby a lot of influence.

In addition to that a lot of Muzzies are homosexuals.

Muzzies say openly, that they hate homosexuals, but privatly, they practice this abnomination.

Arab countries are for European homosexuals like the Pattaya for heterosexual immoral people.

Golden Pheasant makes a very clear statement.
Muzzies publicly declare they hate homos, but are the worst fags in the world.
Talk about takkkiah....

True

In addition to that Chaim mentioned in the last ask-JTF that he saw during his prison-time some Muzzies who appeared on the first view very religious. But after a time they were infected by Aids.

There are two possibilities:

1. They consumed Heroine by injection

2. "Abnomination"

Chaim said it was the second one. Pfui - Muzzies are filthy!