In every English interview and debate that I heard, rav Kahane always asked the same Question to which the other people always avoided a direct answer I don't remember how he used to phrase it but the question was- Do we have the right to prevent the Arabs in Israel from becoming a majority and then democratically transform Israel from a Jewish state to an Arab state?
Evidently 20 years ago It was hard for Israelis to comprehend the severity of this question but as the Arab increase and multiply it becomes their threat becomes more self evident. In fact it becomes more and more relevant to many other countries. Is it time to renew the discussion about the necessity of transfer in to preserve the right of a people to preserve its national and religious identity?
Instead of sinking into arguments about the nature of Islam and whether there is a difference of intentions between Muslims and 'Islamists' why not divert the discussion into the natural right of a people to preserve its national identity.
Is it not strange that nationality has become such a condemned word in the west? Westerners have no right to preserve their nationality because it is racism. Why do the 'P-people' have a right to have their state free of Jews while Israel must accept a seizable and fast growing minority of P-people which eventually would become a majority. Why must a tiny Israel secede the core its historical homeland to the P-people when in fact they already have a state 4 times greater then Israel since they are 70% of Jordan. I mean arguments should work both ways- they claim that Judea and samaria are the core of their land, so does Israel, why Israel must give up if they already have a state 4 times the size of Israel. If Jordan is not a P-state because it doesn't contain the heart-land of the P-people then the same argument applies to Israel and Israel is not a Jewish state. Clearly it's the same thing with Serbia, Macedonia and the Albanians...
But If westerners don't care for the fortunes of their fellow nations, they can foresee that their own fortune is the same. France left Algeria because they thought they couldn't control so many muslims, the result- they imported north africa into France- now there are more Muslims in continental France then there were muslims in french Algeria, and the French are losing control of their country. Eventually France and Algeria might be reunited again only this time as an Arab nation. Do the French then believe that the Algerian have the right to self determination but they also have the right to take over France democratically?
Topic: Rav Kahane's Permanent Argument (Read 1955 times)